us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Lenses » Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor

Testseek.com have collected 38 expert reviews of the Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor and the average rating is 68%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor .
 
(68%)
38 Reviews
Users
(98%)
42 Reviews
68 0 100 38

The editors liked

  • Vibration reduction system. Fixed aperture through zoom range. Sharp images. Fairly light.
  • Excellent image quality in the frame centre
  • Good image quality on the edge of the frame
  • Very good control of chromatic aberration
  • Slight distortion on the APSC/DX detector
  • Zero coma problems
  • Negligible astigmatism
  • Moderate vignetting
  • Silent and acc
  • Relatively slim and lightweight
  • Excellent performance
  • 4-stop optical stabilization

The editors didn't like

  • Tripod collar is an expensive add-on. Soft edges at 70mm
  • Slight spherical aberration at 200 mm
  • Work against bright light could have been better.
  • Lacks that f/2.8 aperture
  • As pricey as some 70-200mm f/2.8 zooms

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2022-05-02, Author: Matthew , review by: digitalcameraworld.com

  • Relatively slim and lightweight, Excellent performance, 4-stop optical stabilization,
  • Lacks that f/2.8 aperture, As pricey as some 70-200mm f/2.8 zooms,
  • 70-200mm f/2.8 zooms are all the rage but they tend to be big and bulky affairs. Naturally, this Nikon lens is an f/stop slower but is much more slimline and lightweight, weighing in at 850g. It has solid build quality, high-tech features and delivers exc...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2018-11-05, review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  Last updated: November 2, 2018Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. Whether you're looking to take close-ups, sports photos or interiors, we've got some...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-12-29, Author: Angela , review by: digitalcameraworld.com

  • Abstract:  If you're looking for an upgrade to your ‘budget' telephoto but can't stretch to a fully professional lens, there are some smart mid-range options to be had. We test 8 top optics to find out which is the best telephoto lens for your money. On test are:Can...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-10-29, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  In this second installment of lens recommendations for the Nikon D810, we've been analyzing the best performing models for landscape and wildlife photography. Admittedly when it comes to fast-paced photography there are better choices in Nikon's range but...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2014-10-15, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Nikon's mid-term refresh of the firm's hugely popular D800 and D800E models resulted in a single model, the D810. Like the D800E it aims to maximize the resolution of the full-frame 36-Mpix CMOS sensor and omits a modified AA filter completely. We've anal...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2014-05-21, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Aimed at professional studio and landscape photographers, the full-frame 36-Mpix D800E with its modified AA filter effectively increasing resolution over the standard D800 model is the closest 35mm full-frame camera yet to rival larger formats in renderin...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(62%)
 
  Published: 2014-04-11, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  We've tested the new 24-Mpix Nikon D3300 with more than 140 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses have the best image quality when paired with the new camera.Like rivals Nikon's cons...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(42%)
 
  Published: 2014-01-31, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Following on the from the lens recommendations for the new mid-range DX format Nikon D5300, we've now completed the assessment of the full-frame Nikon Df. We've tested the camera with more than 90 Nikkor and third-party prime lenses and zooms to assess im...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
 
  Published: 2014-01-16, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Following the lens recommendations for Nikon D7100 and entry-level D3200, we've now turned our attention to the new mid-range D5300. We've tested the camera with more than 140 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(42%)
 
  Published: 2013-12-30, review by: Slrgear.com

  • There is a lot to like about the Nikon 70-200mm ƒ/4G ED VR AF-S, not the least of which is its small profile and light weight. Nikon users have long looked at Canon with longing for a smaller version of the 70-200mm ƒ/2.8 workhorse. That time has now arri...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(98%)
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×