us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Lenses » Sigma 70-300mm 4-5.6 DG APO Macro



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Sigma 70-300mm 4-5.6 DG APO Macro

Testseek.com have collected 12 expert reviews of the Sigma 70-300mm 4-5.6 DG APO Macro and the average rating is 43%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Sigma 70-300mm 4-5.6 DG APO Macro.
 
(43%)
12 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
43 0 100 12

The editors liked

  • Multiformat image coverage

The editors didn't like

  • Very poor image quality at 300mm

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-10-29, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  In this second installment of lens recommendations for the Nikon D810, we've been analyzing the best performing models for landscape and wildlife photography. Admittedly when it comes to fast-paced photography there are better choices in Nikon's range but...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(42%)
 
  Published: 2014-06-04, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  This is the second and final part of our comprehensive lens recommendations for the new entry-level Canon EOS Rebel T5 / 1200D. This time we've assessed zoom lenses from both the Canon and third party makers to see how well they perform on the camera, and...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(22%)
 
  Published: 2014-05-21, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Aimed at professional studio and landscape photographers, the full-frame 36-Mpix D800E with its modified AA filter effectively increasing resolution over the standard D800 model is the closest 35mm full-frame camera yet to rival larger formats in renderin...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(44%)
 
  Published: 2014-04-11, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  We've tested the new 24-Mpix Nikon D3300 with more than 140 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses have the best image quality when paired with the new camera.Like rivals Nikon's cons...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(28%)
 
  Published: 2013-11-22, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Following on from the lens recommendations for the earlier full-frame Nikon D600, we've now had the opportunity to assess a wide range lenses with that model's replacement, the 24-Mpix D610. We've analyzed a total of 95 Nikkor and third-party prime and zo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(38%)
 
  Published: 2013-10-10, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  This is the third part in the series of our lens recommendations for the Nikon D7100 where we've analyzed nearly 46 Nikon and third-party telephoto prime and zoom models to assess their optical quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses are the bes...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(30%)
 
  Published: 2013-10-02, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  This is part one of our lens recommendations for the Nikon D7100 where we've tested over 120 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses are perform best when paired with Nikon's 24M-Pix A...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(30%)
 
  Published: 2009-12-09, review by: electronicsme.com

  • In conclusion, if you are considering a new lens that you can take with you wherever you go without the concern of it feeling like a dead weight by the end of the day then look no further than the Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG MACRO. With decent specs a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-03-26, review by: whatdigitalcamera.com

  • Multiformat image coverage
  • Very poor image quality at 300mm
  • The trouble with this lens is that it tries to do too much: its very versatile but it doesnt shine in any department. It offers so much that it cannot possibly meet all of its promises at such a low price-point. Its resolution figures start low and ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(79%)
 
  Published: 2008-01-19, review by: Slrgear.com

  • Abstract:  The Sigma 70-300mm ƒ/4-5.6 is a viable alternative to manufacturers versions of the same lens. If youre looking for excellent corner-to-corner sharpness across a wide range of focal lengths and apertures you wont find it in the Sigma, but whe...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×