us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 277 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Most Awarded April 2017
April 2017
 
(80%)
277 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
80 0 100 277

The editors liked

  • Exceptional value compared to their Intel Core i5 counterparts. Ryzen holds a clear lead in productivity performance
  • Though gaming performance is more evenly matched between Intel and AMD
  • Excellent Price
  • Great Performance
  • Quality Design
  • AMD is Really Back
  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • Multithreaded performance
  • Twice the compute threads as competing Intel CPUs
  • Improved 1080p gaming performance versus Ryzen 7 chips we tested just a month ago
  • Strong Overall Performance
  • Up To 6-Cores / 12-Threads
  • Power Friendly
  • Aggressive Pricing
  • Faster than comparable Intel chips for multithreading
  • Unlocked for overclocking
  • Gaming performance within 10% of Core i7-7700K and Ryzen 7 1800X
  • Convincingly beats similarly priced Intel Core i5 "Kaby Lake" quad-core chips
  • Features multi-threading (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack)
  • Single-threaded performance imp
  • Performance
  • Overclocking
  • Power consumption
  • Value
  • Comes With SMT Which Core i5 CPUs Lack
  • Outstanding Performance
  • Fully Unlocked
  • Can Easily Be OC'd to 4Ghz+
  • Perfect For Multi-Tasking
  • Future-Proof Platform
  • Great Price/Performance Value
  • Runs Very Cool

The editors didn't like

  • Power efficiency goes right out the window once you start overclocking
  • None
  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Unoptimized software ecosystem
  • IPC throughput deficit
  • 1080p gaming and single-core performance still lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't cost much more
  • Has 50 percent more cores
  • Performance Anomalies In A Few Benchmarks
  • Lack-Luster Overclocking In Early Stages
  • Not a compelling value proposition
  • Sub-par gaming performance
  • Gaming frame-rates lower than competing Intel chips
  • Higher power draw than competing Intel parts
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Overclocking barely worth it
  • Requ
  • Memory Compatibility Limited

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 10 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-05-06, Author: Antonio , review by: hardwareviews.com

  • AMD ha hecho caso de los comentarios y necesidades de los usuarios en cuanto a la necesidad de tener un procesador que ofrezca un nivel competitivo de procesamiento, con capacidades de overclock y una buena relación precio/rendimiento, algo que se le agra...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge-E (2011, 32nm) Carte mère Asus P9X79 (4 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 3.0, SATA 6 Gb/s) Core i7-3970X Core i7-3930K LGA 1366: Bloomfield/Gulftown (2008/2010, 45/32nm) Carte mère Intel DX58SO (3 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 2.0, SATA 3 Gb...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-05, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge-E (2011, 32nm) Carte mère Asus P9X79 (4 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 3.0, SATA 6 Gb/s) Core i7-3970X Core i7-3930K LGA 1366: Bloomfield/Gulftown (2008/2010, 45/32nm) Carte mère Intel DX58SO (3 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 2.0, SATA 3 Gb...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-11, Author: Jean , review by: tomshardware.fr

  • Si, dans la vie, tout n'est pas blanc ou noir, on pourrait dire que ces Ryzen eux le sont, du moins pour l'overlcocking extrême. D'un côté, vous avez des processeurs qui acceptent les températures cryogéniques et les tensions très élevées sans sourcil...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-25, review by: ginjfo.com

  • Ryzen 5 1500x, conclusionNotre test du Ryzen 5 1500X (4C/8T) dévoile de performances de belle tenue. Cette puce répond bien aux sollicitations du segment visé, le milieu de gamme. Son positionnement tarifaire lui permet d'être une alternative convaincante...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Après le lancement des Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X et 1700 début mars, AMD complète aujourd'hui sa gamme Ryzen avec le lancement des Ryzen 5. Au programme, quatre nouvelles références qui tentent de proposer un rapport performance/prix compétitif. Qu'en est-il...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Après les Ryzen 7 visant les passionnés, voici les Ryzen 5 qui vont tenter de convaincre les joueurs d'abandonner les Core i5 aux alentours de 200 euros.AMD a commencé son offensive par le haut de gamme avec les Ryzen 7. Même s'ils offrent des performance...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-10, Author: Régis , review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Performances en rendu 3D, Performances en encodage vidéo, Performances élevées dans l'absolu
  • Performances dans les jeux, Performances légèrement en retrait lorsque le système mémoire est mis à rude contribution
  • Un processeur de milieu de gamme qui fait globalement le travail et qui rivalise sans peine avec les Core i5 d'Intel. S'il accuse un certain retrait dans les jeux par rapport à ses concurrents, celui-ci n'est pas démesuré pour autant...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-06-13, Author: Gian , review by: bitsandchips.it

  • Alla luce di quanto osservato, possiamo affermare che se si vuole solo videogiocare, e non si vuole spendere troppo, la soluzione quad core di punta di AMD risulta attualmente un must-have, grazie soprattutto ad un prezzo decisamente attraente, attorno ai...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-14, Author: Daniele , review by: everyeye.it

  • Ryzen 5 1500X è un processore che da un lato fa molto bene, mentre dall'altro un po' meno: esso, costando di fatto la metà di un Core i7-7700K, agguanta quasi quest'ultimo quando si parla di potenza computazionale nuda e cruda, ma se si va sull'ambito gam...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
    page 10 of 28 « Previous   1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×