us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 348 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2017
April 2017
 
(88%)
348 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
88 0 100 348

The editors liked

  • Exceptional value compared to their Intel Core i5 counterparts. Ryzen holds a clear lead in productivity performance
  • Though gaming performance is more evenly matched between Intel and AMD
  • Excellent Price
  • Great Performance
  • Quality Design
  • AMD is Really Back
  • Very Competitive Pricing (Both CPU and Board)
  • Very Good Multi-tasking Performance (CPU)
  • 14nm Process Allows For Cool and Efficient Operation (CPU)
  • Platform Cost Low Compared To Intel's Offerings
  • 6 Core
  • 12 Threads In The Price Bracket of Non-Threaded
  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Strength in heavily threaded workloads
  • Superior pricetoperformance ratio for budget workstations
  • Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • Six cores and 12 threads for about the same price as Intel's four-thread Core i5 chips
  • Consistently tops pricier Core i7-7700K on tests that take advantage of all available cores
  • Great price for a six-core
  • 12-thread chip
  • Beats even the pricier Core i7-7700K when using all cores on some tests
  • Strong Overall Performance
  • Up To 6-Cores / 12-Threads
  • Power Friendly
  • Aggressive Pricing
  • Convincingly beats the Core i5-7600K "Kaby Lake"
  • Trades blows with costlier i7-7700K in some tests
  • Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack)
  • Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Performance
  • Overclocking
  • Power consumption
  • Value
  • Comes With SMT Which Core i5 CPUs Lack
  • Outstanding Performance
  • Fully Unlocked
  • Can Easily Be OC'd to 4Ghz+
  • Perfect For Multi-Tasking
  • Future-Proof Platform
  • Great Price/Performance Value
  • Runs Very Cool

The editors didn't like

  • Power efficiency goes right out the window once you start overclocking
  • None
  • Gaming Performance Not On Par With Competition
  • Limited Overclocking Potential on Ryzen Processors
  • AM4 Motherboards Not Compatible With High Speed DDR4 DIMMs (yet)
  • Not many applications optimized for Ryzen Processors
  • No integrated graphics across all R
  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • High price relative to Core i57600K
  • Lower overclocking headroom
  • 1080p gaming and single-core performance still lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
  • No stock cooler included in box
  • Lags behind the equivalent Intel chips for 1080p gaming
  • No stock cooler included
  • Performance Anomalies In A Few Benchmarks
  • Lack-Luster Overclocking In Early Stages
  • Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips
  • High power draw
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Overclocking barely worth it
  • Requires optimized apps of which
  • Memory Compatibility Limited

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 12 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-04-12, Author: Javier , review by: geeknetic.es

  • Análisis y conclusiónAMD está trabajando bien para que nuevos juegos, e incluso existentes, puedan aprovechar su arquitectura de forma plena. Los resultados de rendimiento generales son espectaculares para lo que es esta gama rindiendo mucho más que la al...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(41%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-12, Author: Isidro , review by: muycomputer.com

  • diferentes para cada uno, pero antes quiero explicar porqué hemos utilizado los Core i7 6900K y Core i7 7700K en la comparativa, dos soluciones que son mucho más caras que los RYZEN 5 1600X y RYZEN 5 1500X, como podéis ver a continuación:RYZEN 5 1600X: 2...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Mario , review by: madboxpc.com

  • Abstract:  Ryzen no dejó a nadie indiferente, la llegada de estos procesadores volvió a situar a AMD en boca de todos, ya que por mucho tiempo solo existía un nombre en la escena de los CPU de escritorio. En primera instancia se lanzaron los modelos tope de línea, p...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Iván , review by: noticias3d.com

  • Abstract:  El mes pasado AMD presentaba oficialmente los Ryzen 5, si bien comentaron que los procesadores no se pondrían a la venta hasta hoy, día 11 de abril, al igual que estaría vigente el NDA sobre pruebas y especificaciones. Hoy, pues, veremos qué ofrecen el s...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Alan , review by: hd-tecnologia.com

  • Por solo 20 dolares mas que el Intel Core i5-7600K, el Ryzen 5 1600X rinde arriba de un 20% mas que el Core i7-7700K en pruebas sintéticas, y permite jugar arriba de 100 FPS tranquilamente en 1080p, siendo el mejor procesador en términos de precio-rendimi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Miguel , review by: profesionalreview.com

  • procesador todo terreno, ideal para jugar y trabajar, consumo y temperaturas buenas, permite overclockear hasta 4.1 ghz, aplicaciÓn master ryzen de lo mejor que hemos probado en mucho mucho tiempo, procesador todo terreno, ideal para jugar y trabajar, con
  • bios verdes, se necesita mejorarla, para sacar mayor rendimiento se necesita memorias veloces, bios verdes, se necesita mejorarla, para sacar mayor rendimiento se necesita memorias veloces
  • acerca de AMD Ryzen 5 1600XEl AMD Ryzen 5 1600X se posiciona entre una de las opciones más interesantes del mercado y que compite de tú a tú contra el i7-7700K. Cosa que no esperábamos a estas alturas, ya que con AMD Ryzen 7 vimos una gran diferencias (C...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-06, Author: Antonio , review by: hardwareviews.com

  • AMD ha hecho caso de los comentarios y necesidades de los usuarios en cuanto a la necesidad de tener un procesador que ofrezca un nivel competitivo de procesamiento, con capacidades de overclock y una buena relación precio/rendimiento, algo que se le agra...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge-E (2011, 32nm) Carte mère Asus P9X79 (4 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 3.0, SATA 6 Gb/s) Core i7-3970X Core i7-3930K LGA 1366: Bloomfield/Gulftown (2008/2010, 45/32nm) Carte mère Intel DX58SO (3 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 2.0, SATA 3 Gb...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-31, review by: overclockingmadeinfrance.com

  • Grosses nouveautés architecturales côté rouge, Ecrase la concurrence en archivage et création 3D, Rapport Perf/prix en applicatif EXTREMEMENT intéressant, Soudure en indium températures polaires, Ecrase les Quad Core Intel en streaming, Ressenti très f
  • …Mais pas aussi bon que le Ryzen 7 1700, Absence d'iGPU, on aurait préféré un Wraith Spire, Performances en retrait dans certains jeux, Variabilité pas exceptionnelle dans certains cas @Stock, Un bon cran endessous des Ryzen 7 en streaming
  • Il s'agit maintenant de conclure sur ces Ryzen 5 1600 et Ryzen 5 1600X. Comme nous l'avions dit dans le test du Ryzen 7 1800X, cette architecture Zen est une refonte complète et profite des derniers raffinements. AMD a fait l'impasse sur la carte graphi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-05, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge-E (2011, 32nm) Carte mère Asus P9X79 (4 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 3.0, SATA 6 Gb/s) Core i7-3970X Core i7-3930K LGA 1366: Bloomfield/Gulftown (2008/2010, 45/32nm) Carte mère Intel DX58SO (3 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 2.0, SATA 3 Gb...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 12 of 35 « Previous   1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×