us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 503 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2018
April 2018
 
(88%)
503 Reviews
Users
(97%)
243 Reviews
88 0 100 503

The editors liked

  • Strong Performance
  • Easily Overclockable
  • Competitive Pricing
  • Solid increase in performance of previous generation
  • Backwards compatible with 300-series motherboards
  • Soldered IHS (better cooling performance)
  • Comes with cooler
  • More Overclockable
  • More Refined Features
  • Faster than previous-gen Ryzen models
  • Bundled cooler adds value
  • Backward compatibility with 300-series motherboards
  • Indium solder improves thermal transfer
  • Significant performance boost vs. 1800X
  • Bundled coolers
  • Backward-compatible with 300-series motherboards
  • Indium solder
  • Better memory and cache performance
  • Improves on an already good CPU
  • More performance for less money
  • Maintains the same socket
  • Solid performance improvements
  • Outstanding performance in multi-threaded apps
  • More affordable than competing Intel processors
  • Unlocked CPU multiplier
  • Supports existing AM4 motherboards
  • CPU cooler with RGB lighting included
  • Soldered IHS
  • Great productivity and allaround performance. Stock and OC'ed 2700X are mostly faster than the 8700K. Power

The editors didn't like

  • Price. Limited value for money
  • Conclusion
  • Single Thread Perf Still Trails Intel
  • Limited overclocking headroom
  • Higher Peak Power Than Predecessors
  • Max Overclocked Frequencies Still Much Lower Than Intel
  • Needs a better cooler for overclocking
  • No value-oriented 400-series motherboards yet
  • Large performance deficit compared to a stock Ryzen 7 2700X
  • Still no overclocking headroom
  • Not super-new design
  • Single-threaded performance still lower than Intel's
  • Limited overclocking potential
  • Memory still a bit more problematic than on Intel
  • Lacks integrated graphics
  • Stability problems on the 300series boards. Overclocked and generational gains are limited for gamers. The R7 2700X's Wraith Prism cooler struggles during heavy OCs

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 51
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-12-14, review by: benchmarkreviews.com

  • Price. Limited value for money, Conclusion
  • Regardless of what your budget is, there's a CPU that can meet your needs without emptying your bank account. Faster and more efficient CPUs are released every year, so there's no reason to pay for more than what you really need. But if you're an avid gam...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-26, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • By name and by marketing, the i5 CPU is most comparable to the R5 CPUs. The R5 2600's current $160 price-point makes it a less direct comparison, and the 2600X, which would perform about where an overclocked 2600 performs, is about $220. This is also che...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-26, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Battlefield V is playable on quad-cores but you can expect frequent frame dips, resulting in less consistent frame rates. For the most part, we've found that the older Core i5-7600K has been hanging in there pretty well with AAA titles released in 2018, b...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-10-26, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  Intel's recent launch of the Core i9-9900K has a lot of people asking what it means to have the best gaming CPU around. The answer to that question is complicated, and we wanted to take a break from our usual System Guide format to dive deep into this spe...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-07-30, Author: Bob , review by: thinkcomputers.org

  • Solid increase in performance of previous generation, Backwards compatible with 300-series motherboards, Soldered IHS (better cooling performance), Comes with cooler
  • Limited overclocking headroom
  • So we now have second generation Ryzen and the update is quite good. You'll see anywhere from a 10-20% performance boost over the previous generation chips. That puts the 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 2700X that we tested today on top of our test results, eve...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-07-04, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Having established that the Core i7-8700K is hands down faster than the Ryzen 7 2700X for gaming, it's also not a great deal faster. Realistically at 1080p with a beastly graphics card you'll stand to gain up to 15% performance at the high-end, but will m...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-06-26, Author: Tom , review by: overclock3d.net

  • Abstract:  It is common to find guides to overclocking processors, and indeed pre-overclocked system builds, that rely heavily upon the old ethos of sticking as many volts into the processor as it and your cooling can handle, and stopping when everything is stable...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-06-08, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com

  • Strong Performance, Easily Overclockable, Competitive Pricing
  • Single Thread Perf Still Trails Intel
  • AMD Second Generation Ryzen 2000 Series Processors -- Find Them At AmazonIf you're looking to build a relatively powerful desktop system without breaking the bank, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 5 2600 should absolutely be on your short list of considerat...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-06-03, review by: topnewreview.com

  • Improves on an already good CPU, More performance for less money, Maintains the same socket,
  • Still no overclocking headroom, Not super-new design

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2018-06-03, Author: Christopher , review by: gameranx.com

  • Abstract:  When AMD launched their Ryzen processors in 2017, the company gave consumers a worthy alternative to Intel's dominance. Their competitor had little answer to Ryzen's incredible multicore performance and aggressive pricing. Now, the second generation of Ry...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 51 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 51   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×