us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 500 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2018
April 2018
 
(88%)
500 Reviews
Users
(97%)
241 Reviews
88 0 100 500

The editors liked

  • Strong Performance
  • Easily Overclockable
  • Competitive Pricing
  • Solid increase in performance of previous generation
  • Backwards compatible with 300-series motherboards
  • Soldered IHS (better cooling performance)
  • Comes with cooler
  • More Overclockable
  • More Refined Features
  • Faster than previous-gen Ryzen models
  • Bundled cooler adds value
  • Backward compatibility with 300-series motherboards
  • Indium solder improves thermal transfer
  • Significant performance boost vs. 1800X
  • Bundled coolers
  • Backward-compatible with 300-series motherboards
  • Indium solder
  • Better memory and cache performance
  • Improves on an already good CPU
  • More performance for less money
  • Maintains the same socket
  • Solid performance improvements
  • Outstanding performance in multi-threaded apps
  • More affordable than competing Intel processors
  • Unlocked CPU multiplier
  • Supports existing AM4 motherboards
  • CPU cooler with RGB lighting included
  • Soldered IHS
  • Great productivity and allaround performance. Stock and OC'ed 2700X are mostly faster than the 8700K. Power

The editors didn't like

  • Price. Limited value for money
  • Conclusion
  • Single Thread Perf Still Trails Intel
  • Limited overclocking headroom
  • Higher Peak Power Than Predecessors
  • Max Overclocked Frequencies Still Much Lower Than Intel
  • Needs a better cooler for overclocking
  • No value-oriented 400-series motherboards yet
  • Large performance deficit compared to a stock Ryzen 7 2700X
  • Still no overclocking headroom
  • Not super-new design
  • Single-threaded performance still lower than Intel's
  • Limited overclocking potential
  • Memory still a bit more problematic than on Intel
  • Lacks integrated graphics
  • Stability problems on the 300series boards. Overclocked and generational gains are limited for gamers. The R7 2700X's Wraith Prism cooler struggles during heavy OCs

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 50
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Ken , review by: pcper.com

  • Abstract:  Although the timeline doesn't quite work out for Ryzen to have affected the engineering-side of Intel's decision to release a 6-core desktop processor, it's evident AMD's pressure changed Intel's pricing and release schedule.With little desktop competit...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Whew. So what do our reams of data tell us about AMD's second-gen Ryzen CPUs? Let's try and sum it all up with our trusty bang-for-the-buck scatter plots, starting with gaming performance. As a CPU reviewer, I've got to stomach a hard truth: the vast maj...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Well after a week and a half of testing, retesting old CPUs, testing motherboard, photos, videos, editing, and of course writing here we are. Now that I've had some time to live with the Ryzen 2000 Series CPUs I first have to say that AMD continues to...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: AMD , review by: neoseeker.com

  • Just a year ago I was given the opportunity to present the initial roll-out of the AMD Ryzen 7 and 5 CPUs, followed up shortly by the Ryzen 3 CPUs. With those reviews, I presented to you a new line up of AMD processors that proved capable of competing wit...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Dr. , review by: techarp.com

  • The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (Price Check) is not only faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X (Price Check), it is also cheaper and offers more value.Priced at just US$ 329 / RM 1,559, the Ryzen 7 2700X is $20 cheaper, and now comes with an AMD Wraith Prism cooler! T...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com

  • Abstract:  Today marks the initial start of AMD's pre-sale of 2nd Generation Ryzen processors. The full launch is set for April 19th, which is when reviews and performance numbers will be officially available, but today we are able to tell you a bit about the proces...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Shawn , review by: overclockers.com

  • I would like to mention that both CPUs behaved nearly identical when it came to voltage requirements. Both CPUs were stable at 4.0 GHz and 1.3V set in BIOS, 4.2 GHz with 1.4V and 4.3 GHz with 1.45V set in BIOS. Anyone familiar with the Ryzen platform will...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, review by: hardocp.com

  • I can assuredly say that the Ryzen 2700X is the best desktop CPU that AMD has ever built. AMD has gotten its power usage in line with the 12nm process that allows its new Precision Boost 2 technology to shine and shine incredibly brightly. There are a ton...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com

  • Abstract:  With 2017 finished, and Ryzen being very successful for AMD, the inevitable question was due: what happens next? Early in 2018, the plans were laid bare: a second generation Ryzen processor was set to come in mid-year, followed by a second generation Thr...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Tom , review by: overclock3d.net

  • Abstract:  Research and development costs are far and away the biggest drainer of a companies resources. It is an extremely expensive process which largely explains why a lot of manufacturers do their utmost to extract the maximum possible value from their investm...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 4 of 50 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 50   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×