us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 503 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2018
April 2018
 
(88%)
503 Reviews
Users
(97%)
243 Reviews
88 0 100 503

The editors liked

  • Strong Performance
  • Easily Overclockable
  • Competitive Pricing
  • Solid increase in performance of previous generation
  • Backwards compatible with 300-series motherboards
  • Soldered IHS (better cooling performance)
  • Comes with cooler
  • More Overclockable
  • More Refined Features
  • Faster than previous-gen Ryzen models
  • Bundled cooler adds value
  • Backward compatibility with 300-series motherboards
  • Indium solder improves thermal transfer
  • Significant performance boost vs. 1800X
  • Bundled coolers
  • Backward-compatible with 300-series motherboards
  • Indium solder
  • Better memory and cache performance
  • Improves on an already good CPU
  • More performance for less money
  • Maintains the same socket
  • Solid performance improvements
  • Outstanding performance in multi-threaded apps
  • More affordable than competing Intel processors
  • Unlocked CPU multiplier
  • Supports existing AM4 motherboards
  • CPU cooler with RGB lighting included
  • Soldered IHS
  • Great productivity and allaround performance. Stock and OC'ed 2700X are mostly faster than the 8700K. Power

The editors didn't like

  • Price. Limited value for money
  • Conclusion
  • Single Thread Perf Still Trails Intel
  • Limited overclocking headroom
  • Higher Peak Power Than Predecessors
  • Max Overclocked Frequencies Still Much Lower Than Intel
  • Needs a better cooler for overclocking
  • No value-oriented 400-series motherboards yet
  • Large performance deficit compared to a stock Ryzen 7 2700X
  • Still no overclocking headroom
  • Not super-new design
  • Single-threaded performance still lower than Intel's
  • Limited overclocking potential
  • Memory still a bit more problematic than on Intel
  • Lacks integrated graphics
  • Stability problems on the 300series boards. Overclocked and generational gains are limited for gamers. The R7 2700X's Wraith Prism cooler struggles during heavy OCs

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 8 of 51
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Dave , review by: pcgamesn.com

  • This makes Dave a happy panda. This is a high-end AMD processor that makes me question why anyone would now buy the 8700K or 9900K instead. We've genuinely got serious competition in the CPU market once more, with AMD pushing Intel as hard as it's ever do...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Significant performance boost vs. 1800X, Bundled coolers, Backward-compatible with 300-series motherboards, Indium solder, Better memory and cache performance
  • Limited overclocking headroom, No value-oriented 400-series motherboards yet
  • AMD's Ryzen 7 2700X is another big step forward for AMD. The improved boost algorithms add to Ryzen's performance advantage in heavily-threaded applications, while the increased frequency and reduced memory latency provide a boost to a wide range of workl...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, review by: vortez.net

  • Even more competitive multi-threaded performance, Entire range now arrives with Wraith cooler, Improves on every aspect over previous generation, Faster and better memory support, More aggressive pricing, Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 are much improved, Ide
  • Still lacks single core performance compared to Intel, Struggles in memory intensive applications, 105W TDP compared to previous 95W on 1800X, Increased power consumption compared to previous Gen
  • Despite taking the industry by storm last year, AMD weren't happy. There were aspects which needed attention in order to truly scare Intel. Memory performance and latency, as well as slow CPU cache, caused considerable issues with the previous generation...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Solid value, Impressive multi-core performance, All chips unlocked, Lots of motherboard choice
  • Single-thread is better but not great, Limited all-core overclocking headroom
  • AMD has bolstered the Ryzen line-up by announcing four CPUs today. These performance second-generation chips are marketed as the 2000-series family and now augment the G-series models released earlier this year.The purpose of these processors is to en...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Solid value, Impressive multi-core performance, All chips unlocked, Lots of motherboard choice
  • Single-thread is better but not great, Limited all-core overclocking headroom
  • AMD has bolstered the Ryzen line-up by announcing four CPUs today. These performance second-generation chips are marketed as the 2000-series family and now augment the G-series models released earlier this year.The purpose of these processors is to en...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Antony , review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • AMD has done exactly what it needed to with both the Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X, closing the gaps between it and Intel in those lightly-threaded tests (including games) while also extending its lead in multi-threaded applications, where it's now in a...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • PricesThe Sapphire Nitro+ VEGA 64 graphics card is available from most major retailers. At the time of writing, it was just £679.68 on Amazon. The Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti ranges anywhere from £700 to over a £1000 depending which model and which retailer you vi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • PricingThe AMD Ryzen range launched just over a year ago, with the top of the range Ryzen 7 1800X costing around £488/$499. That's all changed now, as you can pick up a 1800X for as little as £255, a 1700X for £224. If that's not fantastic value, the Ryze...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk

  • Abstract:  The new AMD Ryzen 2700X & 2600X CPUs are here – and I've got my hands on them to do a full review. Let's see how much better this second generation Ryzen (Zen+) really is! Want one? 2700X: prourls.co/5zs2 2600X: prourls.co/mrq8 Products shown provided by...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-13, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • Abstract:  The launch of the new Ryzen processors and the latest AM4 X470 chipset motherboards is almost upon us. AMD has been kind enough to let us (and no doubt a fair few others) share a few pictures of the stunning review kit they sent out to us. As you can see...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 8 of 51 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 51   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×