us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD A8-3850 2.9GHz Socket FM1



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD A8-3850 2.9GHz Socket FM1

Testseek.com have collected 160 expert reviews of the AMD A8-3850 2.9GHz Socket FM1 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD A8-3850 2.9GHz Socket FM1.
Award: Most Awarded July 2011
July 2011
 
(82%)
160 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 160

The editors liked

  • Inexpensive Desktop Solution
  • Better Graphics Performance than Expected
  • 100w TDP including Graphics
  • DirectX 11 GPU
  • Native USB 3.0
  • Price/Performance
  • Stability
  • Low cost of the platform
  • Connectivity (graphics
  • USB3
  • SATA3)
  • Reasonable power consumption
  • GPUperformance
  • Good overall price/performance profile. Supports DirectX 11.
  • The new AMD A8-3850 desktop chip offers strong budget gaming and multicore performance at a reasonable price
  • Many modern games playable with on-chip graphics at low settings
  • CPU speed comparable to similarly priced Intel Core i3
  • Integrated Fusion graphics
  • Low power consumption
  • DDR3-1866 memory support
  • IGP supports dual-link DVI for 2560x1600 desktop resolution
  • Good overclocking potential
  • Support for DirectX 11
  • True QuadCore CPU/GPU Combo for $135
  • UVD3 Support
  • Virtualization Support
  • DirectX 11 Capable
  • Discrete Level Graphics
  • Ability to Pair with another Discrete Graphics Card
  • Good Overclocking Headroom
  • Good CPU performance
  • Great GPU performance for integrated graphics
  • SATA III and USB 3.0 natively supported
  • Quad-cores
  • Price efficiency

The editors didn't like

  • Expected somewhat better Stasticial Performance
  • Lacks and L3 Cache
  • HiTech Legion Gold Award
  • Discuss this review in our forums
  • Overclocking
  • Integrated video still not a replacement for discrete cards. Requires new motherboard to take advantage of all features.
  • AMD's new chip doesn't outperform its Intel equivalent on many standard programs
  • Premium RAM required for best graphics performance
  • Lacks Turbo Core tech
  • High price
  • Dissapointing performance gains from mixed CrossFire
  • 3D performance could be better
  • Like all integrated graphics
  • System RAM is reduced by the amount the IGP needs
  • No support for CUDA / PhysX
  • Difficult to Overclock
  • Limited Ability
  • Performance lags behind the Intel Core i3 in light threaded tasks

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 16
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-12-23, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-09-28, review by: rbmods.com

  • Price/Performance, Stability
  • Overclocking
  • Well as we noticed we were not able to overclock this unit at all really. A few MHz was all we could push out of our sample, this doesn’t mean however that this model does not overclock at all because I have seen some nice results on other sites. The ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-23, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  As you may know, a while back, we came to some difficult realizations about the validity of our methods for testing PC gaming performance. In my article Inside the second: A new look at game benchmarking, we explained why the widely used frames-per-second...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-09-21, Author: The , review by: hardwarebbq.com

  • Abstract:  AMD India sent one of the A8 series APU (Accelerated Processing Units) with an 6550HD graphics.With the default clock speed at 2.9GHz and with the brand new FM1 socket type, lets see how the Desktop APU does the job.1. Introduction 2. About A- Series Pro...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-29, review by: metku.net

  • Low cost of the platform, Connectivity (graphics, USB3, SATA3), Reasonable power consumption, GPUperformance
  • To wrap the performance figures up, it's no surprise that the new APU can't match the CPU-oomph of the Phenoms and higher spec Intel-models, but that's not really the point, either. The thing is, these A-series APUs are never even meant for high perfo...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-08-28, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  After the launch of the first mobile A Series APUs, AMD has now officially launched the desktop processor models. Only two have been launched for now, the A8-3850 and the A6-3650, and we’ve tested them both for you. For AMD, APUs are first and foremos...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-25, review by: vrworld.com

  • After all the tests we carried out, the final question remains: Does AMDs A-series mainstream APU deliver? We think it does, at least in the target segment it is marketed for. The CPU delivers enough performance for the majority of users and the GPU li...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-08-24, review by: lanoc.org

  • and FVAfter taking a look at both AMD’s A-Series APU and Sapphire’s PURE Platinum A75 motherboard I have a newfound excitement with both AMD’s mainstream offers and what they will bring to the table with their performance line-up. Sapphire's motherboa...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-23, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  AMD's Bulldozer architecture is still a few more months away, but now we at least have new APUs to tinker with in the mean time. And while Brazos APUs were aimed at 'surrogates' like nettops/netbooks, the new Sabine and Lynx platforms are more full-fle...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 16 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 16   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×