us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2

Testseek.com have collected 45 expert reviews of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2 and the average rating is 72%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2.
 
(72%)
45 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
72 0 100 45

The editors liked

  • 3.0Ghz Stock Processor from AMD
  • Features 2MB of L2 Cache (2x 1MB)
  • Drop-in upgrade for AM2 users.
  • Relatively low cost for the top single-socket AM2 CPU from AMD.
  • Fastest AMD Desktop CPU
  • 3.0 GHz for under $500
  • AM2 Upgrade Compatible

The editors didn't like

  • 90nm Windsor Core - Showing its age
  • Moderate overclocking
  • 65nm Brisbane processors overclock much higher.
  • Not as speedy in most things as Intels Core 2 Duo E6700
  • Higher power consumption.
  • Still 90nm
  • Nonstandard DDR2 Speeds

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-02-20, review by: sharkyextreme.com

  • Fastest AMD Desktop CPU, 3.0 GHz for under $500, AM2 Upgrade Compatible
  • Still 90nm, Nonstandard DDR2 Speeds
  • The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ launch is anticlimactic in some areas, as a 200 MHz increase to the existing Athlon 64 FX architecture can only yield a finite performance gain. That does supply new Athlon 64 X2 high water marks in most performance benchmarks, ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2007-02-20, review by: Techreport.com

  • AMDs two old-school tricks, the price cut and the clock speed bump, have combined to give the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ a pretty good value proposition. Performance-wise, the X2 6000+ is slower overall than the Core 2 Duo E6700, but not by much. That may be ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-19, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Frankly speaking the launch of the new AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor is not a very big event. Until promising new cores based on K8L micro-architecture come out, AMD will hardly be able to surprise us with anything. After the launch of Intel Core 2 ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-19, review by: hothardware.com

  • Abstract:  AMD has been fairly quiet as of late. A few months ago, we took a look at their initial Quad-FX platform and FX-70 series offerings. However,on the mainstream socket AM2 front, AMD hasnt made any real noise since the release of the Athlon 64 FX-62 way bac...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-19, review by: firingsquad.com

  • Abstract:  Since launching the AM2 platform in May, AMD has quietly launched a slew of new Athlon 64 X2 CPUs for the desktop market, starting with the X2 5200+ in early September, 65-nm Brisbane parts on December 5th, and the 5400+ and 5600+ on December 13th.All ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-17, review by: Bcchardware.com

  • 3.0Ghz Stock Processor from AMD, Features 2MB of L2 Cache (2x 1MB), Drop-in upgrade for AM2 users.
  • 90nm Windsor Core - Showing its age, Moderate overclocking, 65nm Brisbane processors overclock much higher.
  • When we were given the opportunity to take a look at the latest desktop processor from AMD, we gladly agreed and were quite excited to see how 3.0Ghz of stock dual-core Athlon 64 goodness could stack up to an Intel Core 2 Duo processor. In the end, w...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2007-02-01, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  The lines, they are a changin’. With the introduction of the AMD Athlon 64 FX 70, ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-08-20, review by: overclockersclub.com

  • Price, Performance Out of Box, Mildly Overclockable, 3.0 GHz...
  • Mildly Overclockable, Multiplier Just About Maxed, 2MB L2 Cache, For an end user these wouldnt be cons, but for an enthusiast, they are worth a mention...
  • I would have loved to actually been able to run benchmarks on this processor in a true 64 bit environment. Believe me, it was tried and between freezes during benchmarks, incompatibility issues with drivers and Vista just not being all it’s cracked...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2007-03-30, review by: atomicmpc.com.au

  • Abstract:  The release of this 3GHz X2 chip from AMD is a surprising one, considering the tough seven months of Core 2 supremacy the CPU giant has faced. That’s surprising in a bad way, like when you walk in on your grandmother dressing and it turns out she&rs...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-26, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  The CPU landscape is really complex. Both AMD and Intel offer tons of different models. But how would today’s processors perform if they didn't have multiple cores? We take 16 different CPUs and compare them all using a single core running at 3 GHz. Ev...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×