us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2

Testseek.com have collected 45 expert reviews of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2 and the average rating is 72%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2.
 
(72%)
45 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
72 0 100 45

The editors liked

  • 3.0Ghz Stock Processor from AMD
  • Features 2MB of L2 Cache (2x 1MB)
  • Drop-in upgrade for AM2 users.
  • Relatively low cost for the top single-socket AM2 CPU from AMD.
  • Fastest AMD Desktop CPU
  • 3.0 GHz for under $500
  • AM2 Upgrade Compatible

The editors didn't like

  • 90nm Windsor Core - Showing its age
  • Moderate overclocking
  • 65nm Brisbane processors overclock much higher.
  • Not as speedy in most things as Intels Core 2 Duo E6700
  • Higher power consumption.
  • Still 90nm
  • Nonstandard DDR2 Speeds

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-07-26, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  The CPU landscape is really complex. Both AMD and Intel offer tons of different models. But how would today’s processors perform if they didn't ......

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-09-18, review by: cluboc.net

  • Abstract:  AMD seems to be having a hard time these days, but actually they should have known what was coming. Lurking through computer hardware forums you can always spot some kind of Intel vs. AMD debate going on, but whats interesting is how AMD keeps ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-05-01, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Its actually simple: Intels current core is really better than that of AMD. Whether its a fair 64-bit application, or an older 32-bit one; whether its multi-way (multi-core) optimized, or is single-threaded classics. In almost every situation Inte...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-03-06, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  March 6, 2007 An Athlon 64 X2 clocked at 3 GHz? This is what AMD proposes with the 6000+. With recent price cuts will it be enough to make a comeback and compete with Intel?AMD’s second dual core at 3 GHzThe Athlon 64 X2 isn’t the first AMD du...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-26, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • AMD is now fairly competitive with Intel after its recent price cuts, but this last addition to the K8 family doesn’t send the ageing architecture out with a bang. That’s not to say it’s a particularly bad processor, it’s just not...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-02-22, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • The AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor is now the fastest dual-core socket AM2 processor that AMD has to offer and comes with the most agressive price we have ever seen on a flagship part. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-20, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  A new Athlon 64 X2 top model launches, squeezing 3.0 GHz out of AMDs 90 nm silicon. It cannot end Intels Core 2 Extreme supremacy, but AMDs aggressive pricing fuels the price war, making the 6000+ somewhat affordable.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-20, review by: amdzone.com

  • Theres nothing too surprising about AMDs Athlon 64 X2 6000+ but it is more than likely a fitting conclusion to consumer level K8 processors. It is the fastest Socket AM2 processor and should beat all of Intels processors except the E6700 and E6800 a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-20, review by: hwupgrade.com

  • Abstract:  Near the end of 2006, AMD began releasing new versions of its Athlon 64 X2 processors. These new processor versions were the first AMD desktop chips to be manufactured using a 65 nanometer process. The move to 65nm has allowed AMD to reduce the costs a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-20, review by: extremetech.com

  • Relatively low cost for the top single-socket AM2 CPU from AMD.
  • Not as speedy in most things as Intels Core 2 Duo E6700; higher power consumption.
  • AMD ships a 3.0GHz CPU that cant keep up with Intels midrange processor in most benchmarks, but its still a decent CPU at a relatively affordable price. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
    page 1 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×