us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-4300 3.8Ghz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-4300 3.8Ghz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 71 expert reviews of the AMD FX-4300 3.8Ghz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 61%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-4300 3.8Ghz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(61%)
71 Reviews
Users
(90%)
868 Reviews
61 0 100 71

 

Reviews

page 1 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-09-01, Author: Rafael , review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • It may seem strange to review a CPU launched some time ago, but we were curious about if could this model be used for a budget work or gaming computer nowadays.That's why we choose to compare it with the FX-6350 (and the A10-7850) rather than the Pentium...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-20, Author: Carl , review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Abstract:  Usually when we review new CPUs, it's the top model, and sometimes the one right below it. Not often do manufacturers send out low-end or mid-range models. If you were wondering why most hardware sites' last CPU review was probably the FX-8350 launch last...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-10, review by: insidehw.com

  • Abstract:  AMD FX-4300: Cheap Piledriver The first Piledriver CPU was presented not so long ago as the flagship AMD model. Afterwards, we got a few more CPUs with new and improved architecture, all recognisable by the already familiar naming schemes. The latest s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-03-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  We've already reviewed the top processor of AMD's Vishera family, FX-8350. That was just the beginning of the big refresh for the Socket AM3+ platform. AMD has also rolled out a number of more affordable CPUs. Today we're going to cover them in compari...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-11, Author: Don , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Now that Piledriver-based CPUs and APUs are widely available (and the FX-8350 is selling for less than $200), it's a great time to compare value-oriented chips in our favorite titles. We're also breaking out a test that conveys the latency between frames....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-04, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Abstract:  The launch of Socket AM3+ processors with Piledriver microarchitecture inspired many AMD fans. However, until recently we only based our opinion on the results obtained from the top model in the new AMD FX family. Today we are going to make up for this omission and carry out a detailed performance analysis of all Vishera processors with eight, six and four cores....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-25, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • Abstract:  AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 processors performance analyzedAMD released the FX series Vishera - Piledriver based processor. And though everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8350 processor, another three processors have been relea...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Anand , review by: anandtech.com

  • Abstract:  Last year's launch of AMD's FX processors was honestly disappointing. The Bulldozer CPU cores that were bundled into each Zambezi chip were hardly power efficient and in many areas couldn't significantly outperform AMD's previous generation platform. Look...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-30, review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Abstract:  While the FX-8350 may have hogged the lion’s share of AMD’s Vishera launch coverage, a number of more affordable processors were introduced alongside it. The six core FX-6300 and quad core FX-4300 are both priced under $140 and should provide some re...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-09, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com/au/

  • OK performance, Decent overclocking ability
  • No performance increase over last gen, Too close in price to FX6300

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
    page 1 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×