us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-6300 3.5Ghz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-6300 3.5Ghz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 89 expert reviews of the AMD FX-6300 3.5Ghz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-6300 3.5Ghz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Recommended July 2015
July 2015
 
(76%)
89 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
76 0 100 89

The editors liked

  • Cheapest processor out there that overclocks and gives a great performance
  • Loads of motherboards still support this architecture and work well with it too
  • Easy to overclock using multipliers
  • Has tremendous abilities without costing much

The editors didn't like

  • AMD FX series always fares miserably when it comes to single core performance and the FX-6300 is no different
  • Multi-player gaming is not possible on this processor though most games will play well
  • Without a dedicated graphics card
  • You need to invest in

 

Reviews

page 3 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-11-07, review by: presence-pc.com

  • Abstract:  Véritable cerveau de l’ordinateur, le processeur se doit d’être choisi avec le plus grand soin. En effet, si le nombre de fabricants de processeurs x86 grand public s’est réduit comme une peau de chagrin au fil des ans, la quantité de modèles différent...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-01-28, Author: Don , review by: tomshw.it

  • Abstract:  Monolith ha prodotto molti giochi memorabili basati sul motore proprietario Lithtech, inclusi Aliens Vs. Predator 2, Tron 2.0, la serie F.E.A.R. e molti altri. L'ultimo "parto" degli sviluppatori è La Terra di Mezzo: L'Ombra di Mordor , un gioco che abbia...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-26, review by: insidehardware.it

  • La CPU AMD FX-6300 ha mostrato muscoli e qualità senza dubbio apprezzabili. Sebbene le ottimizzazioni si vedano poco dal punto di vista dei risultati dei benchmark, nelle applicazioni più moderne e meglio parallelizzate, riescono ad offrire incrementi pre...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2013-02-18, review by: tomshw.it

  • Abstract:  I primi processori dual-core non erano sfruttati appieno , perché la maggior parte delle applicazioni più comuni non era ottimizzata per usare più di un core, e questa realtà riguardava anche i videogiochi. D'altra parte programmare per sistemi paralleliz...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-06-03, Author: Carsten , review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Abstract:  Das Destillat unserer CPU-Tests von AMD- und Intel-Modellen im Überblick: Sie suchen eine neue CPU oder APU zum Spielen oder möchten einfach über das derzeitige Angebot Bescheid wissen? PC Games Hardware wirft einen Blick auf die aktuelle Situation in der...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-01-07, review by: pc-magazin.de

  • gute 3D-Leistung
  • CPU- und Systemleistung mäßig

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-08-29, Author: Florian , review by: gamestar.de

  • schnell genug für alle aktuellen Spiele in maximalen Details
  • nicht schneller als die Phenom-II-Vorgänger, deutlich langsamer als die (teureren) Sandy- und Ivy-Bridge- sowie Haswell-CPUs von Intel
  • Florian Klein: Der AMD FX 6300 schließt dank der Piledriver-Verbesserungen vor allem hinsichtlich seiner Energieeffizienz etwas zur Intel-Konkurrenz auf und bietet für 100 Euro viel Rechenleistung sowie gute Multimedia-Leistung. Auch zum Spielen in Full H...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(81%)
 
  Published: 2013-05-03, Author: Marc , review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Abstract:  Unsere bisherigen CPU-Tests zu Crysis 3 zeigten spannende Resultate: In Leveln mit viel Gras schnitten AMDs FX-Prozessoren exzellent ab, in anderen Szenen lagen ähnliche teure Intel-Modelle vorne, mal bremste SMT und mal nicht. Wir testen erneut mit der V...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-04, review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Abstract:  MD senkte die Preise, wodurch der FX-6300 unter 100 Euro rutschte und stellte zudem die Modelle FX-6350 und FX-4350 vor, wir testeten beide. Weiterhin zeigt der Athlon II X4 750K im Test, dass es auch für nur 65 Euro ein tolles CPU-Angebot gibt, welches vier Kerne bietet und gut übertaktbar ist. Kürzlich...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-11-30, review by: hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Dat Intel de snelste processors maakt, is anno 2015 een open deur. Maar heeft het ook de beste processor wanneer je 50, 100 of 150 euro wilt uitgeven? Om die vraag te beantwoorden hebben wij bijna alle courante AMD en Intel desktopprocessors (57 stuks!) getest...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×