us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Most Awarded July 2015
July 2015
 
(79%)
266 Reviews
Users
(93%)
2719 Reviews
79 0 100 266

The editors liked

  • Excellent Price
  • Improved "Piledriver" Cores
  • AMD Turbo Core 3.0
  • Improved latencies compared to FX8150
  • 4GHz out of the box (4.2GHz with Turbo Core)
  • Unlocked
  • 5GHz Overclockable
  • Excellent Multi-threading Performance
  • Very Reasonable Price
  • Strong Overclocking Potential
  • Best OEM Cooler Available
  • Improved performance and power consumption over previous generation products.
  • Reasonably priced
  • Appreciable performance improvements with multicore-optimized software
  • Compatible with older AMD socket and motherboards
  • Good Performance
  • Decent Overclocker
  • Improved Efficiency
  • Easy Upgrade For Existing AMD Owners
  • Lower priced processor and cheaper motherboards
  • An overall performer with decent scores in almost all benchmarks should be sufficient reasons to get the AMD FX-8350
  • Designed for overclocking
  • This processor really does double up on clock speeds without
  • Eight cores and 5GHz on your desktop computer
  • Officially supports DDR31866 memory
  • Better performance than Intel on multithreaded tasks
  • An FX system has 38 usable PCIE lanes as opposed to the 24 lanes of a Sandy Bridge system
  • Excellent price/performance ratio
  • Finally competitive with Intel in the $200 CPU range
  • Excellent affordability versus computing power
  • Low platform price
  • NEW Piledriver CPU core design
  • Improved "Per Clock" performance
  • Compatible with existing AM3+ products

The editors didn't like

  • Power consumption and temperatures have been improved but still high
  • Lack Luster Single Threaded Performance
  • Still lags Intel in important areas like gaming
  • Still lags behind in single-core tests
  • Uses much more power than comparable Intel chips
  • Which also have on-chip graphics
  • Dated Platform
  • Intel CPUs Still Clearly Faster
  • Outdated technology that does not match up to latest generation of processors from Intel
  • Eats a lot of power in stock configuration and naturally heats up when overclocked
  • With Ryzen 5 coming out shortly
  • The 8350 might just have breathed its last
  • Shou
  • Single core performance still lags far behind Intel
  • Few programs use new FX instructions like fused multiplyadd
  • So the full performance potential remains untapped
  • Same maximum TDP as previous products
  • Perhaps a bit late to the market. It still uses 32nm while Intel is on 22nm
  • Higher power consumption than Intel products
  • "Low" but adequate single-threaded performance will not appeal to some

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2021-10-12, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • All the data we've gathered provides real insight into how AMD and Intel CPU architectures compared over the past decade for gaming. We've seen AMD come from nowhere to often beating Intel, while the latter has made smaller steps in pure architecture term...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2020-11-24, review by: proclockers.com

  • Abstract:  Released in 2011, the AM3+ CPUs are now the grannies on today's CPU market. But are they still relevant today? Although we're now using AM4 CPUs, some AM3+ CPUs are still around. Either still in some stores or part of some builds, the AM3+ chips are still...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-27, review by: armchairempire.com

  • Lower priced processor and cheaper motherboards, An overall performer with decent scores in almost all benchmarks should be sufficient reasons to get the AMD FX-8350, Designed for overclocking, this processor really does double up on clock speeds without
  • Outdated technology that does not match up to latest generation of processors from Intel, Eats a lot of power in stock configuration and naturally heats up when overclocked, With Ryzen 5 coming out shortly, the 8350 might just have breathed its last, Shou
  • A reliable performer that has been doing the rounds for years now, AMD FX-8350 was supposed to revolutionize the processor market in its launch year. Unfortunately, the euphoria did not last and AMD was relegated to the realms of affordable unlocked proce...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(68%)
 
  Published: 2016-05-12, Author: AMD , review by: neoseeker.com

  • Testing will be conducted by having the FX 8350 CPU set to operate at the base and turbo mode frequencies, then running Prime95 to obtain a stress readings for temperature and fan speeds. Readings will be made with the older AMD stock cooler compared to t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-05-06, review by: proclockers.com

  • Excellent Multi-threading Performance, Very Reasonable Price, Strong Overclocking Potential, Best OEM Cooler Available
  • Lack Luster Single Threaded Performance
  • The new AMD FX 8350 is far from ground breaking. It does not really need to be either. Its multi-threading prowess would make the Intel Core i3 an easy target and can even take down the more expensive Core i5 in some cases. As the overclocking testing sho...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-04-22, Author: Ron , review by: modders-inc.com

  • Abstract:  Rumours of the AMD FX processor's death has been greatly exaggerated. Five years old and still going — ancient by typical CPU-age metrics but have newfound relevance with the rise of VR. Both the AMD FX 6350 and FX 8350 pass the SteamVR performance test w...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-06-26, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  Although I didn't spend much time playing Batman: Arkham Origins, I remember the game rather well after testing it on no less than 30 graphics cards and 20 CPUs. Arkham Origins appeared to take full advantage of Unreal Engine 3, it ran smoothly on afforda...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-05-13, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Competition is a good thing and without it, we all lose out. Unfortunately, Intel isn't facing much in the way of competition in the desktop CPU market right now, and they haven't for some time. AMD's year and a half old Piledriver-based FX processors can...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-13, Author: hassan , review by: wccftech.com

  • By the end of this review, all i have to say is that AMD now has a product that is competitive against Intel processors in terms of value. Intel Core i5 series are aimed by budget PC builders and gamers since they offer about the same performance minus th...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
 
  Published: 2013-05-07, review by: notebookcheck.net

  • Abstract:  Review AMD Trinity and FX Desktop Processors Klaus Hinum, Till Schönborn ( translated by Martina Osztovits), 05/07/2013 Windows Ivy Bridge Gaming Desktop roundup. Notebookcheck leaves the beaten track: We compare current PC process...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 27 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×