Testseek.com have collected 347 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4.
March 2017
(84%)
347 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(98%)
17 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
840100347
The editors liked
Great Multi Thread performance
Solid Gaming Performance
Nice Overclocking room on 1700
Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
Price
Power Efficiency
Experience
Great Multithreaded Performance
Low Power Consumption
Very Reasonable Price
Best Ryzen 7 Value
Remarkable multithreaded performance
More core and threads than the competition
1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
The full-featured AM4 platform
Excellent value for money
Unlocked ratio multiplier
Lowcost eight core
65W TDP
Bundled cooler
Twice the cores and threads as Intel's competing Core i7-7700K
At a slightly lower price
Our test chip hit nearly 4GHz in overclocking
Strong Overall Performance
8-Cores / 16-Threads
Power Friendly
Aggressive Pricing
Great value for money considering its multi-threaded performance and more than decent single thread performance
Easily overclocks should the need ever arise
Default power requirement is pretty low considering it is an eight-core processor
The cheapest
Great multi-threaded performance
Significant single-threaded performance increase over Bulldozer
Lower TDP than i7-7700K
8-cores
16-threads for only $329
Performance
Overclocking
Power consumption
Value
Outstanding Performance
Low-Power Consumption (65W TDP)
Much Cheaper Than Competition
Ryzen Master Software
Perfect For Multi-Tasking
Can Reach 1800X Performance Easily
Future-Proof Platform
Ultimate Price/Performance Value
Runs Very Cool
The editors didn't like
Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
Bested By Intel In Gaming
Limited Overclocking Capability
Questions remain over gaming performance
Some early adopter quirks linger
Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models
Lower game performance than Intel processors
Poorly optimized software ecosystem
Single-core and 1080p gaming performance lag behind Intel's comparable Kaby Lake chips
Issues In A Few Benchmarks
Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
Lack of game optimization makes Intel quad-cores a better bet
Draws excessive power when overclocked
Single thread performance does not come close to Intel flagship models
Abstract: AMD Ryzen 3 vs Ryzen 5 vs Ryzen 7So far we have taken a close look at most of AMD's Ryzen line-up and, while there have been variances from model to model, overall both the Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 7 series have indeed lived up to expectations. Their combination...
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Threadripper 1920X are very impressive processors that did extremely well in content creation benchmarks that take advantage of having a 16-core, 32-thread processor in the system. The good news is a good number of app...
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Threadripper 1920X are very impressive processors that did extremely well in content creation benchmarks that take advantage of having a 16-core, 32-thread processor in the system. The good news is a good number of app...
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net
By name and by marketing, the i5 CPU is most comparable to the R5 CPUs. The R5 2600's current $160 price-point makes it a less direct comparison, and the 2600X, which would perform about where an overclocked 2600 performs, is about $220. This is also...
Published: 2017-08-02, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
We have some interesting results to discuss. Let's start with the Core i7-6900K and 7820X.It was shocking to find that when comparing clock-for-clock performance using the same memory speed on both setups, the older 6900K was faster in every single game w...
Great value for money considering its multi-threaded performance and more than decent single thread performance, Easily overclocks should the need ever arise, Default power requirement is pretty low considering it is an eight-core processor, The cheapest
Lack of game optimization makes Intel quad-cores a better bet, Draws excessive power when overclocked, Single thread performance does not come close to Intel flagship models, Should You Buy The AMD Ryzen 1700
The Ryzen 1700 is a much welcome addition to the CPU marketplace and one that will definitely force Intel to up its game. Even if the 1800X does not manage to topple Intel top performers, it will force Intel to reduce its costs.We feel with time and more...
Abstract: Its hard to believe considering we just finished up an Intel launch, but it is already time to check out Intel’s next launch. Kaby Lake was launched at the beginning of this year and the Mainstream lineup of CPUs is getting refreshed with Coffee Lake and Z370. This is the 8th generation of Intel’s Core processors going back to the original launch back in 2006...
Abstract: Although we've already posted a “first looks” preview of how the Ryzen 7 1700 performs online, we're finally getting around to giving this processor its due. Read on to see if this is the perfect Ryzen for you.This Summit Ridge processor equipped with two...
Abstract: One of the biggest advantages of the latest AMD Ryzen 7 1800X and 1700X 8-core processors over the Intel i7-6900K is that they are far more affordable with a performance that almost matches head-on. And if you think that the new Ryzen 7 chips are still ou...
Comparing the results of the Ryzen 7 1700 benchmarks to the the Core i7-7700K, it is clear that, in some testes (like the Cinebench R15), the Ryzen 7 1700 is far superior (because of its number of cores and threads). On the other hand, in other tests and...
