Testseek.com have collected 346 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4.
March 2017
(84%)
346 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(98%)
17 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
840100346
The editors liked
Great Multi Thread performance
Solid Gaming Performance
Nice Overclocking room on 1700
Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
Price
Power Efficiency
Experience
Great Multithreaded Performance
Low Power Consumption
Very Reasonable Price
Best Ryzen 7 Value
Remarkable multithreaded performance
More core and threads than the competition
1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
The full-featured AM4 platform
Excellent value for money
Unlocked ratio multiplier
Lowcost eight core
65W TDP
Bundled cooler
Twice the cores and threads as Intel's competing Core i7-7700K
At a slightly lower price
Our test chip hit nearly 4GHz in overclocking
Strong Overall Performance
8-Cores / 16-Threads
Power Friendly
Aggressive Pricing
Great value for money considering its multi-threaded performance and more than decent single thread performance
Easily overclocks should the need ever arise
Default power requirement is pretty low considering it is an eight-core processor
The cheapest
Great multi-threaded performance
Significant single-threaded performance increase over Bulldozer
Lower TDP than i7-7700K
8-cores
16-threads for only $329
Performance
Overclocking
Power consumption
Value
Outstanding Performance
Low-Power Consumption (65W TDP)
Much Cheaper Than Competition
Ryzen Master Software
Perfect For Multi-Tasking
Can Reach 1800X Performance Easily
Future-Proof Platform
Ultimate Price/Performance Value
Runs Very Cool
The editors didn't like
Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
Bested By Intel In Gaming
Limited Overclocking Capability
Questions remain over gaming performance
Some early adopter quirks linger
Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models
Lower game performance than Intel processors
Poorly optimized software ecosystem
Single-core and 1080p gaming performance lag behind Intel's comparable Kaby Lake chips
Issues In A Few Benchmarks
Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
Lack of game optimization makes Intel quad-cores a better bet
Draws excessive power when overclocked
Single thread performance does not come close to Intel flagship models
– What Is The DDR4 Sweet Spot For RyzenAMD Ryzen 7 1700 With ATI RubyAfter using the AMD Ryzen 7 processors for almost two weeks no on the MSI X370 XPower Gaming Titanium motherboard we've found that this processor loves all the memory bandwidth that it...
Published: 2017-03-05, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com
Abstract: Many Phoronix readers appear rather intrigued by the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 on Linux as it offers good multi-threaded performance with eight cores / 16 threads and retails for just $329 USD. Making the Ryzen 7 1700 even more appealing to enthusiasts is that it...
Published: 2017-03-04, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com
Abstract: Curious how Ryzen scales across its CPU cores and SMT? Here are some Ubuntu Linux benchmarks testing a Ryzen 7 1700 with different core counts.The MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM motherboard used for our Ryzen 7 testing thus far offers a new "downcore con...
AMD Ryzen With ATI RubyThe AMD Ryzen 7 1700 processor benchmark results with this chip overclocked up to 4.0 GHz are impressive. Running all 8-cores on a Ryzen processor at 4 GHz is fun and you can see how far AMD has come with Ryzen since the old FX seri...
Published: 2017-03-03, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com
Abstract: Yesterday we posted launch-day Ryzen 7 1800X Linux benchmarks that were particularly appealing for multi-core / heavily-threaded workloads like code compilation. Given all the code compilation done by Linux users in particular, if you were intrigued by th...
Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com
Strong Overall Performance, 8-Cores / 16-Threads, Power Friendly, Aggressive Pricing
Issues In A Few Benchmarks, Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
It's not all good news, though. With some legacy apps, audio encoding, lower-res gaming, and platform level tests, Ryzen trailed Intel – sometimes by a wide margin. There is obviously still optimization work that needs to be done – from both AMD and softw...
Man, there is just so much to take in with this launch. I've gone through the testing and even though I have to follow up (hopefully) later on today when our 1700 comes in with its performance. I can say that testing Ryzen as a whole has been a roller...
AMD sees Ryzen 7 processors as being the perfect fit for multi-threaded (nT) work with slightly lower single threaded (1T) performance. Our testing shows that is true for the most part. In applications where all cores are being used the 8-Core, 16-Thread...
Abstract: I'm going to start this article off with a simple number: five. Not only is that the number of months it has taken AMD to effectively turn the x86 processor world on its ear, but that's also the number of distinct model families that they've introduced...
Looking back at how things played out over the course of this review, I have no doubt it will be one of the most hotly debated articles that I've written in the last few months, maybe even the last year. There's no denying that the Zen architecture has pr...
