Testseek.com have collected 347 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4.
March 2017
(84%)
347 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(98%)
17 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
840100347
The editors liked
Great Multi Thread performance
Solid Gaming Performance
Nice Overclocking room on 1700
Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
Price
Power Efficiency
Experience
Great Multithreaded Performance
Low Power Consumption
Very Reasonable Price
Best Ryzen 7 Value
Remarkable multithreaded performance
More core and threads than the competition
1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
The full-featured AM4 platform
Excellent value for money
Unlocked ratio multiplier
Lowcost eight core
65W TDP
Bundled cooler
Twice the cores and threads as Intel's competing Core i7-7700K
At a slightly lower price
Our test chip hit nearly 4GHz in overclocking
Strong Overall Performance
8-Cores / 16-Threads
Power Friendly
Aggressive Pricing
Great value for money considering its multi-threaded performance and more than decent single thread performance
Easily overclocks should the need ever arise
Default power requirement is pretty low considering it is an eight-core processor
The cheapest
Great multi-threaded performance
Significant single-threaded performance increase over Bulldozer
Lower TDP than i7-7700K
8-cores
16-threads for only $329
Performance
Overclocking
Power consumption
Value
Outstanding Performance
Low-Power Consumption (65W TDP)
Much Cheaper Than Competition
Ryzen Master Software
Perfect For Multi-Tasking
Can Reach 1800X Performance Easily
Future-Proof Platform
Ultimate Price/Performance Value
Runs Very Cool
The editors didn't like
Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
Bested By Intel In Gaming
Limited Overclocking Capability
Questions remain over gaming performance
Some early adopter quirks linger
Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models
Lower game performance than Intel processors
Poorly optimized software ecosystem
Single-core and 1080p gaming performance lag behind Intel's comparable Kaby Lake chips
Issues In A Few Benchmarks
Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
Lack of game optimization makes Intel quad-cores a better bet
Draws excessive power when overclocked
Single thread performance does not come close to Intel flagship models
Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com
For the desktop PC gamer, the higher TDP X models are still the go-to for gaming and general performance though. They're a little faster, and a little more expensive, but you get what you pay for. However, if heat and power are a big concern to you, and t...
Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com
I can see the Ryzen 5 2600 and the 2600X fast becoming the most popular chips of the second generation Ryzen launch. They're fast, they're affordable, and they're easy to keep cool and overclock. I mean, if you're just doing a massive amount of rendering...
Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...
Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...
Was this review helpful?
Award
-
Published: 2017-12-05, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net
There's a range of advice we can offer to any prospective Ryzen owners. First, the more expensive 1800X is only recommended if you want the fastest possible stock processor, no matter what the cost. Highly clocked out of the box, there's not a huge amount...
Abstract: For the past few years, processors made by Intel have been more powerful – and much more popular – than those made by rival AMD. However, AMD’s Ryzen processors have turned that around: they’re powerful CPUs at a tempting price, and an excellent alternati...
Abstract: AMD hadn't just announced a new processor architecture, but the dawning of a new manufacturing process in which the chips would be based on, 14nm which was a first for AMD. Not only was their new 14nm FinFET process to be more energy efficient, but would...
Unlocked ratio multiplier, Lowcost eight core, 65W TDP, Bundled cooler
Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models, Lower game performance than Intel processors, Poorly optimized software ecosystem
The 1700 performs well in heavily threaded workloads, but lags behind Intel's quad cores in most gaming scenarios. However, the Ryzen 7 1700 also offers the lowest entry-level price point for a modern eight-core processor and features enough overclock...
Published: 2017-04-03, Author: Dave , review by: pcgamesn.com
The Ryzen 7 1700 is really what I was hoping for from the first octa-core Zen-based chips. It's around the same price as Intel's eight-threaded quad-core i7 7700K, if a little cheaper, and runs rings around it from a straight CPU performance point of view...
