Testseek.com have collected 293 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 .
March 2017
(87%)
293 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
870100293
The editors liked
Great Multi Thread performance
Solid Gaming Performance
Nice Overclocking room on 1700
Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
Price
Power Efficiency
Experience
Great Multithreaded Performance
Low Power Consumption
Very Reasonable Price
Low Platform Entry Price
Remarkable multithreaded performance
More core and threads than the competition
1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
The full-featured AM4 platform
Excellent value for money
Unlocked ratio multiplier
Low cost eightcore
Low TDP
Multithreaded application performance
Strong Overall Performance
8-Cores / 16-Threads
Power Friendly
Aggressive Pricing
Nearly as speedy as flagship Ryzen 7 1800X with the same eight cores
16 threads
Test chip was stable overclocked to 4GHz
Stunning multithreaded performance
Superaggressive pricing
Fully unlocked
Performance
Overclocking
Power consumption
Value
Outstanding Performance
Low-Power Consumption (95W TDP)
Much Cheaper Than Competition
Ryzen Master Software
Perfect For Multi-Tasking
Can Reach 1800X Performance Easily
Future-Proof Platform
Great Price/Performance Value
Runs Very Cool
Great value. Smooth gaming with strong minimum frame rates. Powerful productivity performance. Runs cool
The editors didn't like
Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
Bested By Intel In Gaming
Limited Overclocking Capability
Questions remain over gaming performance
Some early adopter quirks linger
Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
Lower gaming performance than Intel processors
Poorly optimized software ecosystem
Issues In A Few Benchmarks
Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
1080p gaming and single-core performance lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
Minimal overclocking
Headroom
Patchy gaming performance
Temperature
Slightly Rushed To The Market
Not really cons
But the few areas where Ryzen fell short of Intel were gaming performance and power consumption. Not great overclockers
Ryzen 7 vs. IntelIt is certainly not an easy task to classify the Ryzen CPUs. The octa-core chips convince with dream results in the synthetic benchmarks and even beat much more expensive rivals with ease.However, we cannot give a full recommendation, bec...
Published: 2017-04-04, Author: Bruno , review by: reviewstudio.net
performance, overclocking, power consumption, value
temperature
Ryzen 7 1700X is basically a 1800X with lower clock. The performance is close to its brother's, and the price reflects that very good.The temperature issue will be solved by AMD and all Ryzen 7 will report normal values.PROsCONs- performance- overclocking...
Great Multithreaded Performance, Low Power Consumption, Very Reasonable Price, Low Platform Entry Price
Bested By Intel In Gaming, Limited Overclocking Capability
Ryzen is a radical departure from the previous Bulldozer derived processors. AMD started from a clean slate and it shows. There's very little in common between Ryzen and AMD's older processors. Ryzen is a fully modern CPU with awe inspiring capabilities.W...
Nearly as speedy as flagship Ryzen 7 1800X with the same eight cores, 16 threads, Test chip was stable overclocked to 4GHz
1080p gaming and single-core performance lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
AMD's Ryzen 7 "middle chip" trails close behind AMD's pricier flagship CPU, and competes well with costlier Core i7s in tasks that like lots of cores. But for now, it shares the same 1080p gaming issues as its silicon siblings. Read More...
Abstract: After much anticipation, the Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 1700 CPUs are finally here. The internet has been buzzing since launch and not everything has been in-favor of the new architecture. My personal experience so far has been great, really, and I feel AM...
Lower gaming performance than Intel processors, Poorly optimized software ecosystem
The Ryzen 7 1700X offers a simple path to overclocked performance that matches its more expensive 1800X counterpart. The 1700X lags behind Intel's faster quad-cores in many gaming applications, but offers diverse capabilities in heavy workloads. -...
Published: 2017-03-23, Author: Patrick , review by: gamersnexus.net
Compared to the 1800X ($500), the 1700X predictably had mostly identical performance when overclocked, but the 1700X ($400) didn't offer any additional overclocking headroom over the 1700. And, for that matter, the 1800X doesn't offer any more headroom th...
Published: 2017-03-23, Author: stefan , review by: madshrimps.be
The Ryzen 7 1700X octa-core processor from AMD was designed to fill-in the gap between the 1800X flagship and the 65W-rated Ryzen 7 1700, at an affordable price point of just $399. This SKU borrows all the features from the more expensive variant, includi...
Great Multi Thread performance, Solid Gaming Performance, Nice Overclocking room on 1700, Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master, Price, Power Efficiency, Experience
Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
Don't let negative vibes fool you. AMD has released an excellent design that far surpasses what the release was like of the FX-8350 years ago. If it wasn't for Ryzen 5, I'd tell everyone to get a Ryzen 7 1700. If you can use 8 cores though, you should...
I have to admit that I like the Ryzen 7 1700X quite a lot. It is 100 USD cheaper and offers the close to 1800X performance. It surely will reach the same tweaking levels also.At 399 USD this CPU is over half the price of what Intel is charging, and AMD do...
