us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 293 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 .
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(87%)
293 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
87 0 100 293

The editors liked

  • Great Multi Thread performance
  • Solid Gaming Performance
  • Nice Overclocking room on 1700
  • Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
  • Price
  • Power Efficiency
  • Experience
  • Great Multithreaded Performance
  • Low Power Consumption
  • Very Reasonable Price
  • Low Platform Entry Price
  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • Low cost eightcore
  • Low TDP
  • Multithreaded application performance
  • Strong Overall Performance
  • 8-Cores / 16-Threads
  • Power Friendly
  • Aggressive Pricing
  • Nearly as speedy as flagship Ryzen 7 1800X with the same eight cores
  • 16 threads
  • Test chip was stable overclocked to 4GHz
  • Stunning multithreaded performance
  • Superaggressive pricing
  • Fully unlocked
  • Performance
  • Overclocking
  • Power consumption
  • Value
  • Outstanding Performance
  • Low-Power Consumption (95W TDP)
  • Much Cheaper Than Competition
  • Ryzen Master Software
  • Perfect For Multi-Tasking
  • Can Reach 1800X Performance Easily
  • Future-Proof Platform
  • Great Price/Performance Value
  • Runs Very Cool
  • Great value. Smooth gaming with strong minimum frame rates. Powerful productivity performance. Runs cool

The editors didn't like

  • Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
  • Bested By Intel In Gaming
  • Limited Overclocking Capability
  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Lower gaming performance than Intel processors
  • Poorly optimized software ecosystem
  • Issues In A Few Benchmarks
  • Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
  • 1080p gaming and single-core performance lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Minimal overclocking
  • Headroom
  • Patchy gaming performance
  • Temperature
  • Slightly Rushed To The Market
  • Not really cons
  • But the few areas where Ryzen fell short of Intel were gaming performance and power consumption. Not great overclockers

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 6 of 30
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-03-26, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • There's a range of advice we can offer to any prospective Ryzen owners. First, the more expensive 1800X is only recommended if you want the fastest possible stock processor, no matter what the cost. Highly clocked out of the box, there's not a huge amount...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-24, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • Great value for money, 8-Core w/ 16 Threads, Latest AM4 platform, Incredibly easy to overclock, Performance similar to the flagship 1800X, Automatic overclocking, Good overall performance, Robust gaming performance,
  • None, Neutral, Memory performance still has a few bugs, but we expect these to be fixed with a BIOS update, Like all 8-core chips, it can get quite warm, so a powerful cooler is recommended, Still a little more expensive than the 7700K, “The Ryzen R7 1700
  • PricingThe Ryzen 7 1700 comes in at just £332.60, while the 1700X comes with a small premium on top at just £360.57. If you want the best Ryzen has to offer, however, you'll have to step up, as the 1800X still costs £488.99. That makes the 1700X around th...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-03-06, Author: Luke , review by: kitguru.net

  • Superb multithreaded performance, Comfortably outperforms the similarlypriced Core i76800K in multithreaded tasks, Up to 3.9GHz XFR and 3.8GHz Precision Boost frequencies aid singlethreaded performance, Can be overclocked close to Ryzen 7 1800X frequencie
  • Gaming performance is not best suited for ultrahigh refresh rates and trails Core i76800K and i77700K levels (outside of GPUlimited scenarios), Some memory speed limitations – difficult pushing past 3.2GHz, Fewer PCIe lanes and dualchannel memory are comp
  • AMD's Ryzen 7 1700X continues the trend of superb price-vs-performance especially when competing against Intel's 6+ core HEDT chips. The 8C16T 1700X costs around £400, which is the same as a 6C12T Broadwell-E i7-6800K, but is able to offer performance clo...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-03, Author: Parm , review by: HEXUS.net

  • 8 cores, 16 threads for under £400, Impressive multi-core performance, Almost every bit as fast as the 1800X, Wide range of modern AM4 boards, Vastly improved power consumption, Gives Intel food for thought
  • Single-thread is good but not great, Gaming optimisations still needed, Limited overclocking potential
  • The launch of AMD's Ryzen processor is a significant milestone in the company's history. Such is the importance of the Zen architecture that it makes sense to step back and consider how much progress AMD has made.This time last week, the chip manufact...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Antony , review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Overall, then, the day has finally arrived that we thought would never come - a competitive CPU from AMD at the high end. There are some teething problems to get over, and don't expect as polished an experience as you would from an Intel Z270 system right...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-01-03, Author: Luca , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  These days there are basically two different groups of customers who demand lots of processing power: content creators and gamers, while this 2D performance comparison is targeting content creators. After having had a look at the following pages you'll ha...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-13, Author: Mithun , review by: digit.in

  • Great multi-threaded performance, Economical unlocked 8-core CPU
  • Ecosystem still to mature, Still not completely optimised for gaming
  • From what we've seen with the benchmarks, AMD's Ryzen 7 series offer a lot better performance given their much lower price point. Anomalies were plenty with some of the newer benchmarks with the Ryzen 5 processors which proved to be better. AMD's gain is...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(71%)
 
  Published: 2017-06-22, Author: Gyaandalf , review by: gamingcentral.in

  • While the numbers are impressive, gaming performance of Ryzen processors still leaves a lot to be desired. Not to mention that games are yet to be optimized for the Ryzen processors and DX 12, which can lead to better utilization of multiple CPU cores. Th...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-13, Author: goldfries , review by: goldfries.com

  • The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X retails at just RM 1,899 but when you compare price to performance, it floors the Ryzen 7 1800X as they're near identical but with the Ryzen 7 1700X running slightly cooler due to the lowered clock speed. My only dislike towards the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-06-26, Author: John , review by: hardwarezone.com.my

  • Sometimes you don't have to be the absolute best to be a winnerIn a nutshell, Ryzen 5's main advantage over Intel's Core i5 range is the higher number of cores and threads it offers while sharing the same price bracket. That's not unlike what AMD offers w...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
    page 6 of 30 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 30   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×