us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 293 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 .
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(87%)
293 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
87 0 100 293

The editors liked

  • Great Multi Thread performance
  • Solid Gaming Performance
  • Nice Overclocking room on 1700
  • Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
  • Price
  • Power Efficiency
  • Experience
  • Great Multithreaded Performance
  • Low Power Consumption
  • Very Reasonable Price
  • Low Platform Entry Price
  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • Low cost eightcore
  • Low TDP
  • Multithreaded application performance
  • Strong Overall Performance
  • 8-Cores / 16-Threads
  • Power Friendly
  • Aggressive Pricing
  • Nearly as speedy as flagship Ryzen 7 1800X with the same eight cores
  • 16 threads
  • Test chip was stable overclocked to 4GHz
  • Stunning multithreaded performance
  • Superaggressive pricing
  • Fully unlocked
  • Performance
  • Overclocking
  • Power consumption
  • Value
  • Outstanding Performance
  • Low-Power Consumption (95W TDP)
  • Much Cheaper Than Competition
  • Ryzen Master Software
  • Perfect For Multi-Tasking
  • Can Reach 1800X Performance Easily
  • Future-Proof Platform
  • Great Price/Performance Value
  • Runs Very Cool
  • Great value. Smooth gaming with strong minimum frame rates. Powerful productivity performance. Runs cool

The editors didn't like

  • Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
  • Bested By Intel In Gaming
  • Limited Overclocking Capability
  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Lower gaming performance than Intel processors
  • Poorly optimized software ecosystem
  • Issues In A Few Benchmarks
  • Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
  • 1080p gaming and single-core performance lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Minimal overclocking
  • Headroom
  • Patchy gaming performance
  • Temperature
  • Slightly Rushed To The Market
  • Not really cons
  • But the few areas where Ryzen fell short of Intel were gaming performance and power consumption. Not great overclockers

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 26 of 30
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-04-04, Author: Silvio , review by: notebookcheck-tr.com

  • Abstract:  Ryzen işlemcilere göz atıp, yeni Zen mimarisi hakkındaki temel noktaları inceliyoruz...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-25, Author: Ján , review by: touchit.sk

  • Abstract:  AMD už dlho neuviedlo na trh procesory, ktoré by urobili taký rozruch, ako rodina modelov Ryzen. Inovatívna architektúra a najmä 14 nm výrobný proces umožnili dosiahnuť zaujímavý výkon v pomere ku frekvencii a až osem fyzických jadier zasa výborný výkon v...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-10, Author: Ľubomír , review by: pcrevue.sk

  • Vysoký mnohovláknový výkon, podstatne vyšší výkon než pri rovnako drahom Ci7-6800K, vzhľadom na výkon nízka spotreba
  • Testované procesory je možné zakúpiť v e-shope Alza.sk, Vysoký mnohovláknový výkon, podstatne vyšší výkon než pri rovnako drahom Ci7-6800K, vzhľadom na výkon nízka spotreba, Trochu nižší jednovláknový výkon, nízke frekvencie, slabé pretaktovanie, SMT neo

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-09, Author: Димитър , review by: hardwarebg.com

  • ЗаключениеМисля че след всичко казано до тук става ясно защо 1700х е оптималният избор до момента – той е значително по-евтин от 1800Х, представа се за всички практически цели на сходно ниво и се овърклоква подобно. Честно казано на този фон цената и прои...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-06, Author: PCWorld , review by: pcworld.bg

  • Abstract:  Денислав Славчев Последните години не бяха никак леки за AMD. Компанията изпитваше сериозни затруднения на процесорния пазар поради липсата на достатъчно иновативни предложения.  Изоставането и спрямо основния  конкурент с всяка изминала години се увелича...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-26, review by: bozzabench.com

  • AMD Ryzen 7 1700X je vrhunksi procesor, jedan od najboljih PC desktop procesora današnjice. Dobri utisci i jednako snažne impresije koje je na nas ostavio najjači Ryzen 7 1800X se nastavljaju i u slučaju gotovo identičnog Ryzen 7 1700X procesora podešenog...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-01-17, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  今年DIY市场是最为不平凡的一年,尤其是CPU市场是最近几年变化幅度最大的一年。突出表现在AMD推出锐龙系列处理器对抗Intel中高端产品,另外就是Intel提前发布了第八代酷睿处理器,酷睿i3/5/7全系提升了物理核心。强悍的Ryzen 7和酷睿i7-8700K无疑让大家看到了两家在高端领域的较量。但回归到实用型产品,我们还得考虑中低端产品。今天我们就拿两款AMD/Intel的中端级处理器出来比一比。R7 1700X和i7 7700K哪个好 R7-1700X与i7-7700K区别对比一、基本规格...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-21, Author: 吴紫磨 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 纠错与问题建议标签:笔记本电脑1W元以上独显笔记本笔记本PK擂台 nb.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 2602 AMD的Ryzen系列处理器在今年掀起了PC市场的反击狂潮,时下R5、R3 系列已经全面铺货,对Intel构成了莫大的压力。全线对垒形式下,笔记本端的APU战线也已经补全, 锐龙7 2700U以极大的优势碾压了默认TDP下的英特尔8代酷睿低电压处理器,更强悍的R5 240...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-11-20, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  R5 1600X和R7 1700X哪个好?在目前AMD Ryzen5中端系列处理器中,Ryzen5 1600X是规格最高的一款,而AMD Ryzen7高端系列当中也有一款带X结尾的R7 1700X处理器,表现也极为不错,性能比较突出,同样受到了不少用户的关注。那么R5 1600X和R7 1700X哪个好呢?今天小编通过 R5-1600X对比R7-1700X来解析一下。R5 1600X和R7 1700X哪个好 R5-1600X对比R7-1700X一、R5 1600X和R7 1700X性能哪个好?...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-07, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  今年上半年,AMD和Intel都推出了多款新品处理器,其中不乏锐龙Threadripper和酷睿i9-7900X等性能突出的旗舰级产品。但对于大多数用户来说,在选购CPU的过程中还是更加注重性价比部分,即便是相对高端的玩家,在购买CPU时的预算也不会超过3000元。本次,我们就选择了两款AMD和Intel今年推出的主流级CPU进行对比评测。本次对比评测的两款产品分别为AMD Ryzen 7 1700X和Intel酷睿i7-7800X。参数方面,前者采用八核十六线程设计,默认频率3.4GHz,加速频...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 26 of 30 « Previous   1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×