Testseek.com have collected 137 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4.
October 2017
(90%)
137 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
900100137
The editors liked
The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance
Uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X
The 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
Workstation and productivity
Price per core
Solder
Easy to cool
MultiThreaded performance
60 PCIe lanes
Outperforms Intel's pricier Core i9 chip on core-hungry tests
Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes
Great Multi-Threaded Performance
Massive Amounts Of IO
High Memory Bandwidth
Modern Chipset Support
Unlocked And Tweakable
Disruptive Pricing
The editors didn't like
The $1
000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming
Modes changes require a reboot
Lowresolution gaming performance
Compatible motherboards are expensive
Byzantine installation process compared to mainstream CPUs
Competing Intel chips are better at lightly threaded tasks
Published: 2018-08-14, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com
Abstract: It's one of the greatest questions of our time: AMD or Intel? Today, that rivalry has entered a new stage of Cinebench taunting as AMD's 2000-series Threadripper processors, commonly known as Threadripper 2, come to market to compete against Intel's Skyla...
Published: 2018-08-06, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com
Abstract: AMD is taking the wraps off its second-generation Ryzen Threadripper CPU lineup this morning, and the company is upping the ante in the war for multithreaded superiority on the high-end desktop. Two new chips for workstation and content creation use—the T...
Published: 2018-03-15, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net
The R3 2200G offers highly competitive performance at its price and, ultimately, really has no immediate competition. At $100, the CPU offers 78-85% of the performance of the R5 2400G at 58% of the price. Not bad at all. We can strongly recommend the R3 2...
Published: 2018-02-05, Author: Dave , review by: hothardware.com
Abstract: The effect cryptocurrency mining has had on the PC gaming industry, specifically the now sky-high cost of graphics cards, is profound. However, someday mining algorithms may change enough such that GPUs aren't the only non-specialized compute engines capa...
PRODUCT INFOAMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X10th August, 2017Type ProcessorPrice $799 USIntroductionIt was the beginning of 2017, Intel thought the year would go really smooth for them in regards to their mainstream and high end desktop launches. Intel launch...
Published: 2017-08-30, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com
Workstation and productivity, Price per core, Solder, Easy to cool, MultiThreaded performance, 60 PCIe lanes
Modes changes require a reboot, Lowresolution gaming performance
AMD's Threadripper 1920X offers a great price point for a beefy 12 cores and 24 threads, and while you lose four cores compared to the high end Threadripper 1950X, it comes at a $200 savings. That's great news if you are seeking unrestrained connectiv...
Published: 2017-08-18, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com
Before we issue a verdict on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Threadripper 1950X, it's time once more to condense our results using our famous value scatter plots. We take the geometric mean of all of our real-world test results and plot that figure agai...
Outperforms Intel's pricier Core i9 chip on core-hungry tests, Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes
Compatible motherboards are expensive, Byzantine installation process compared to mainstream CPUs, Competing Intel chips are better at lightly threaded tasks
At $799, AMD's 12-core Threadripper chip skips along ahead of Intel's competing $999 Core i9 on core-happy computing tasks, while costing a couple of hundred bucks less. Just factor in the high cost of motherboards and cooling into your build budget...
Was this review helpful?
Award
(80%)
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance, uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X, the 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
The $1,000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Threadripper 1920X are very impressive processors that did extremely well in content creation benchmarks that take advantage of having a 16-core, 32-thread processor in the system. The good news is a good number of app...
