us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4

Testseek.com have collected 137 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice October 2017
October 2017
 
(90%)
137 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
90 0 100 137

The editors liked

  • The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance
  • Uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X
  • The 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
  • Workstation and productivity
  • Price per core
  • Solder
  • Easy to cool
  • MultiThreaded performance
  • 60 PCIe lanes
  • Outperforms Intel's pricier Core i9 chip on core-hungry tests
  • Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes
  • Great Multi-Threaded Performance
  • Massive Amounts Of IO
  • High Memory Bandwidth
  • Modern Chipset Support
  • Unlocked And Tweakable
  • Disruptive Pricing

The editors didn't like

  • The $1
  • 000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming
  • Modes changes require a reboot
  • Lowresolution gaming performance
  • Compatible motherboards are expensive
  • Byzantine installation process compared to mainstream CPUs
  • Competing Intel chips are better at lightly threaded tasks
  • Relatively High Power Consumption
  • Trails Intel In Lightly-Threaded Apps
  • Still Pricey
  • Though Better Than Intel

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 14
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-07-31, Author: Régis , review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Performances en rendu 3D, Performances en encodage vidéo, Performances élevées du fait de la présence de 12 cœurs
  • Performances dans les jeux, Performances légèrement en retrait lorsque le système mémoire est mis à rude contribution
  • Avec ses 12 cœurs et sa fréquence de fonctionnement élevée, il est évident que ce processeur s'avère ultra rapide pour réaliser des tâches applicatives et arrive à se hisser légèrement au-dessus des puces à 10 cœurs d'Intel. Arme absolue pour l'encodage v...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-10-17, Author: Ciro , review by: rehwolution.it

  • Abstract:  Cinque.Cinque gli anni che sono serviti ad AMD per rimettersi in sesto sul fronte delle CPU (sul fronte GPU, ahimé, ci vuole ancora un po' prima di dare seria competizione alle schede di punta di NVIDIA).Cinque sono anche le piattaforme che vedranno il la...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-09-02, review by: tomshw.it

  • Prestazioni con carichi workstation e produttività, prezzo per core, saldatura, facile da raffreddare, prestazioni multi-thread, 60 linee PCI Express,
  • I cambiamenti di modalità richiedono un riavvio, prestazioni di gioco a risoluzioni basse,
  • Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offre gran parte delle caratteristiche di Threadripper 1950X. Di conseguenza le prestazioni nei software che sfruttano i thread sono elevate. Inoltre ha una frequenza base maggiore e più margine in OC rispetto a qualsiasi Ryzen te...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Michele , review by: pcproffesionale.it

  • Abstract:  L'attesa è finita. Dopo il susseguirsi di piccole anticipazioni oggi debuttano ufficialmente i processori Ryzen Threadripper 1950X e 1920X. È un lancio su scala globale, ma se da oggi tutti possono acquistare uno dei nuovi processori, sono in pochi color...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-07-19, review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  Maxon hat den beliebten weil kostenlosen und einfach zu handhabenden CPU-Benchmark Cinebench neu aufgelegt. Sechs Jahre nach Cinebench R15 folgt Cinebench R20 mit neuer Engine und neuer Projektdatei...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-03-11, review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  tl;dr: Maxon hat den beliebten weil kostenlosen und einfach zu handhabenden CPU-Benchmark Cinebench neu aufgelegt. Sechs Jahre nach Cinebench R15 folgt Cinebench R20 mit neuer Engine und neuer Projektdatei. ComputerBase hat eigene Benchmarks erstellt und...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-02-03, Author: Christoph , review by: computerbild.de

  • Abstract:  Bei neuen Spitzenmodellen reicht oft nur Geduld, um das Smartphone unter 500 Euro zu bekommen.2018 erklommen die Preise für Top-Smartphones neue Regionen. Das auffälligste Beispiel liefert Apple: Das günstigste aktuelle iPhone beginnt bei 849 Euro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-30, review by: computerbase.de

  • Intel Basin Falls Refresh im HEDT-SegmentDer Basin Falls Refresh als Plattform-Update widmet sich mit dem Skylake-X Refresh den Core-X-Prozessoren, deren Namensgeber im Juni 2017 die Skylake-X-Familie war. Sie sind nach wie vor im Sockel R4 alias LGA 2066...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-22, Author: Ingolf , review by: computerbild.de

  • Mit gleich 32 beziehungsweise 18 Rechenkernen und stolzen Preisen von 1.800 Euro teilen sich AMDs Threadripper Ryzen 2990WX und Intels Core i9-7980XE den COMPUTER BILD-Testsieg. Damit kommen sie aber nur für Enthusiasten mit dickem Geldbeutel infrage...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-03, Author: Florian , review by: computerbild.de

  • Mit gleich 32 beziehungsweise 18 Rechenkernen und stolzen Preisen von 1.800 Euro teilen sich AMDs Threadripper Ryzen 2990WX und Intels Core i9-7980XE den COMPUTER BILD-Testsieg. Damit kommen sie aber nur für Enthusiasten mit dickem Geldbeutel infrage. Ein...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 14 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×