us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4

Testseek.com have collected 220 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice August 2017
August 2017
 
(88%)
220 Reviews
Users
(60%)
2 Reviews
88 0 100 220

The editors liked

  • The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance
  • Uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X
  • The 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
  • Better performance than the equivalent Intel chip for the price
  • Fully featured platform across all chips
  • While liquid cooling is a must
  • Theadripper is easier to tame than Skylake-X
  • Huge improvements in production tasks over mainstream CPUs
  • Competitiv
  • Workstation and productivity applications
  • Price per core
  • Solder
  • MultiThreaded performance
  • PCIe connectivity
  • Wildly extreme 32-thread performance
  • For the same price as Intel's new 20-thread Core X-Series CPU
  • Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes
  • Great Multi-Threaded Performance
  • Massive Amounts Of IO
  • High Memory Bandwidth
  • Modern Chipset Support
  • Unlocked And Tweakable
  • Disruptive Pricing

The editors didn't like

  • The $1
  • 000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming
  • Overclocking remains limited
  • Needs a suitably robust cooling setup and power supply
  • Lags behind Intel in overall IPC performance
  • Confusing settings
  • Low resolution gaming performance
  • CPU is large and will need a robust cooler
  • Particularly when overclocking
  • Byzantine installation process compared to mainstream CPUs
  • Competing Intel chips are better at lightly threaded tasks
  • Relatively High Power Consumption
  • Trails Intel In Lightly-Threaded Apps
  • Still Pricey
  • Though Better Than Intel

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, review by: hardocp.com

  • Abstract:  It is highly likely that you already know what AMD's Threadripper actually is in terms of specifications given all the recent coverage. Here is a quick chart that will give you the basics that you need to know. While we are not reviewing the Threadripper...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • Hopefully you've been paying attention these last many pages, as the launch of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper processor and X399 platform is not a simple read-the-last-page kind of release. From a technology and architecture stand point, what might at first a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Tom , review by: overclock3d.net

  • We've got one item of hardware which comes with an unhesitating recommendation and one that has a little bit of a caveat to it, although nothing that you probably couldn't have imagined yourself.Starting with the unhesitating one, the ASUS X399 ROG Zenith...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Workstation and productivity applications, Price per core, Solder, MultiThreaded performance, PCIe connectivity
  • Confusing settings, Low resolution gaming performance
  • If you need Threadripper, you'll know it. Heavy multitaskers, streamers, those who regularly use heavily threaded applications or have heavy PCIe requirements will all experience competitive performance. The recommendation comes with a caveat, though...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • Well, that's a bunch of processor performance alright - pretty cool, huh? The word 'amazing' is the one word that keeps returning while I was testing this platform. First off, this - you will not need a 16 or 12 core processor for your gaming needs, I mea...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Matt , review by: computershopper.com

  • Wildly extreme 32-thread performance, for the same price as Intel's new 20-thread Core X-Series CPU, Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes
  • CPU is large and will need a robust cooler, particularly when overclocking, Byzantine installation process compared to mainstream CPUs, Competing Intel chips are better at lightly threaded tasks
  • AMD's 16-core Threadripper 1950X is no-brainer for serious content creators and uncompromising multi-taskers. It also handled our test game titles better than Intel's competing Core i9. Just know that compatible X399 motherboards are pricey, at least at...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com

  • Great Multi-Threaded Performance, Massive Amounts Of IO, High Memory Bandwidth, Modern Chipset Support, Unlocked And Tweakable, Disruptive Pricing
  • Relatively High Power Consumption, Trails Intel In Lightly-Threaded Apps, Still Pricey, Though Better Than Intel
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors -- Find Them At AmazonWhether it sells in big numbers or not (we think it will), Threadripper is going to be a disruptive product. For creative professionals that need massive amounts of compute performance, Threadripper...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-03, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • Abstract:  A Sneak preview on Ryzen Threadripper processors A meet & greet with the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and 1950XSoon the AMD Ryzen Threadripper review will go live, however to fill that gap in time AMD has allowed the media to show some photos of the press-kit...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-07-20, Author: Justin , review by: gamecrate.com

  • Abstract:  AMD recently announced that their new 16 core / 32 thread Threadripper 1950X CPU will retail for $999, while the 12 core / 24 thread 1920X CPU will come in at $799. These sums seem kingly until you realize that they're meant to compete with Intel's 18 cor...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-13, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • Abstract:  We already know a lot of about Threadripper, AMD's answer to the X299/X99 high-end desktop platforms from Intel, including that they would be coming this summer, have up to 16-cores and 32-threads of compute, and that they would all include 64 lanes of P...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 22 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×