us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4

Testseek.com have collected 220 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice August 2017
August 2017
 
(88%)
220 Reviews
Users
(60%)
2 Reviews
88 0 100 220

The editors liked

  • The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance
  • Uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X
  • The 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
  • Better performance than the equivalent Intel chip for the price
  • Fully featured platform across all chips
  • While liquid cooling is a must
  • Theadripper is easier to tame than Skylake-X
  • Huge improvements in production tasks over mainstream CPUs
  • Competitiv
  • Workstation and productivity applications
  • Price per core
  • Solder
  • MultiThreaded performance
  • PCIe connectivity
  • Wildly extreme 32-thread performance
  • For the same price as Intel's new 20-thread Core X-Series CPU
  • Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes
  • Great Multi-Threaded Performance
  • Massive Amounts Of IO
  • High Memory Bandwidth
  • Modern Chipset Support
  • Unlocked And Tweakable
  • Disruptive Pricing

The editors didn't like

  • The $1
  • 000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming
  • Overclocking remains limited
  • Needs a suitably robust cooling setup and power supply
  • Lags behind Intel in overall IPC performance
  • Confusing settings
  • Low resolution gaming performance
  • CPU is large and will need a robust cooler
  • Particularly when overclocking
  • Byzantine installation process compared to mainstream CPUs
  • Competing Intel chips are better at lightly threaded tasks
  • Relatively High Power Consumption
  • Trails Intel In Lightly-Threaded Apps
  • Still Pricey
  • Though Better Than Intel

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-02-08, Author: Derek , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  It's one of the greatest questions of our time: AMD or Intel? Today, that rivalry has entered a new stage of Cinebench taunting as AMD's 2000-series Threadripper processors, commonly known as Threadripper 2, come to market to compete against Intel's Skylake-X series...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-20, Author: James , review by: kitguru.net

  • Best single-socket CPU power on the market with most applications, Best modelling performance with most applications, Best GPGPU performance (when configured optimally)
  • Expensive overall system price – £1,200 more than AMD-AMD option, NVIDIA GeForce graphics not validated for professional applications, Behind AMD option for video editing with Adobe applications, Price: £5,754.00 inc VAT (Buy from Armari HERE), Discuss on
  • On the face of it, this head-to-head would appear to be a relatively clear win for the Intel and NVIDIA-based Armari Magnetar S18X-RD850G2 over the all-AMD Armari Magnetar S16T-RW850G2. But look a little more closely and the result is nowhere near as obvi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-20, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • Blazes through workstation tasks with ease, Incredible multi-tasking potential, Competitive 4K gaming performance, Easy to overclock (albeit hard to keep cool), 64-PCIe lanes, Quad-channel memory support,
  • Poor gaming performance at lower resolutions, Requires a very powerful CPU cooler, Neutral, Some games and software still don’t know what to do with all those cores, “It’s not without its problems, but to see AMD not only competing but winning in workstat
  • PricingAll prices are correct as of 19/08/2017Currently, the AMD Threadripper 1950X is £989.99, not bad given the performance and price per core. Especially so compared to the Intel i9-7900X which is around the same price at £935.38. Dependant on what you...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-11, Author: Kevin , review by: techradar.com

  • Ready for the ultimate mega-tasking, Easier to Install than Intel, Futureproof expandability
  • More power hungry than Intel's rival, Switching profiles requires a full restart
  • The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X isn't the silicon messiah for all the hype its announcement and launch produced, but that's fine. AMD has produced a very competitive product to go up against Intel's long unopposed Extreme Edition processors.Although the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-11, Author: Jim , review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The Threadripper 1950X is a seriously fast processor for people who need to do serious work on their PC. Yes, you can buy one and use it in your home PC for gaming, but it's not the best choice if that's all you're going to do. Its Intel rival – the Core...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-11, Author: Luke , review by: kitguru.net

  • Superb multi-threaded performance, 1950X is the highest-performance consumer CPU available and the 1920X is generally second-fastest, Excellent price versus performance even compared to Ryzen 7, Quad-channel memory support with high bandwidth results and
  • ” in the review are so depraved you can not even imagine, and lacking 1 star out of 10… For what? For not being available for free?, Oxymorons, Robert Johnson, I have to slightly disagree with the gaming analysis. Many times the reason RYZEN doesn't perf
  • AMD's Ryzen Threadripper processors are unequivocally fast computational powerhouses. For the first time in many, many years, AMD can justifiably claim to offer the highest performance consumer processor on the planet in the 16-core Ryzen Threadripper 195...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, review by: vortez.net

  • Brilliant unboxing/installation experience, Performs well in multi-threaded scenarios, Decent thermal performance, Supplies up to 66 PCI Express Gen3 lanes
  • Expensive, No support for NVMe RAID
  • The last 6 months has been a clear warning to manufacturers that being complacent can be rather unwise. AMD has really ignited the desktop CPU market with the release of their Ryzen CPUs and it really goes without saying that for all those involved, never...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Antony , review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Abstract:  It's easy to assume, given Intel's dominance over the last few years, that its products filled pretty much every niche and price point you would need whether you're a gamer or content creator. However, even before AMD's return to form earlier this year, e...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • 16 cores and 32 threads for $999, Extremely fast in multi-threaded tasks, Forward-looking X399 platform, Quad-channel memory, Brings competition back to HEDT
  • Single-thread not as good as Intel, Game Mode and Creator Mode confusion
  • AMD has used the word disruptive to describe the new Zen CPU architecture that powers Ryzen desktop CPUs, Epyc server processors and now, in August 2017, a trio of Threadripper chips designed to rip up the existing high-end desktop rule book.Threadrip...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 22 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×