us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775

Testseek.com have collected 73 expert reviews of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775.
 
(79%)
73 Reviews
Users
(94%)
350 Reviews
79 0 100 73

The editors liked

  • Excellent Performance
  • Quad Core Technology
  • MultiThreading Performance
  • Unlocked Multiplier
  • Outstanding Functionality
  • Amazing Overclocking Capability
  • Future Proof Technology
  • Power
  • Knocks the socks of all other processors in audio
  • Image and video encoding
  • Blindingly Fast Media Encoding
  • MultiThreading and MultiTasking Demon
  • Compatible with some LGA775 Platforms
  • Four Core 2 processors in one package
  • Good overclocking potential
  • Tremendous performance on multithreaded applications.
  • Major leap in performance on multitasking and most multithreaded applications compared to high-end dual-core CPUs
  • Lots of apparent headroom for overclocking an already fast chip.
  • First commercially available quadcore CPU
  • Performance
  • Overclockability

The editors didn't like

  • Quite Expensive
  • High power requirements
  • No improvement in many programs as yet
  • Expensive
  • Only 2.66 GHz
  • Core 2 E6700level Gaming Performance
  • 130W TDP
  • Little gain in many applications
  • L2 cache not shared between the two Core 2 dies.
  • High price tag makes quad-core processing an elite technology for now
  • Apples twin dual-core Xeons in the Mac Pro make for a faster digital design configuration.
  • Price
  • Heat output
  • Stock HSF

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-11-02, review by: pcper.com

  • Intels new Core 2 Extreme QX6700 is probably the fastest processor we have ever tested. Though some may argue that the prevalence of single threaded applications over multi-threaded ones is a reason to keep with single-core CPUs, that may hold true f...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2006-11-02, Author: Andrew , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Abstract:  I still remember the strange looks I used to get from my friends, when I told them I had a computer with two processors. Yet now, PC World is advertising the benefits of Core Duo architecture on nationwide television. Granted it has cringe-worthy referenc...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • I think it is clear that quad-core is not for everyone at this moment in time, and that is exaggerated even more when you consider that the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 is going to retail for somewhere north of £650 including VAT. When you consider that a Cor...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: Bootdaily.com

  • Abstract:  Under most circumstances it?d be quite appropriate to start off this review with statements on how Quad-Core CPUs really don?t matter to the mainstream at this time etc. etc. But under the guise of an Intel-driven multi-core marketplace, it?d be comple...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Abstract:  Sooner Than Expected Probably the worst-kept secret in Intels recent history, the quad-core CPU codenamed Kentsfield is here. But can you blame them for wanting to spill their guts? Not only have they pretty much embarrassed AMD with the launch of C...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Intel has unleased quad-core processors into the world and the Intel Core 2 Extreme Processor QX6700 is without a doubt the fastest desktop processor when it comes to applications that support four or more cores. In short the QX6700 is Quad-Zilla! I...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Summing up I have to state that it will be very hard to draw a final line today. The thing is that Kentsfield processors have evidently got far ahead of their time. There are not that many applications yet that could use the potential of all four cores...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: hothardware.com

  • Abstract:  To say this year has been a bit of a whirl-wind adventure would be an immense understatement. Weve seen Intel move from a back-seat position versus the Athlon 64 X2with their Pentium D architecture, to commanding virtually all of the lime-light as of late...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Just as the shock from the initial performance leap of Core 2 Duo wears off, Intel "leaps ahead" with a doubled-up version. Are we ready?

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: MotherBoards.org

  • After a few weeks of testing and retesting I can say that the QX6700 not only runs a bit cooler than its previous siblings and that it was entirely stable. We never even shut the thing down other than to reinstall Windows for the entire two weeks we te...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×