us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775

Testseek.com have collected 73 expert reviews of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775.
 
(79%)
73 Reviews
Users
(94%)
350 Reviews
79 0 100 73

The editors liked

  • Excellent Performance
  • Quad Core Technology
  • MultiThreading Performance
  • Unlocked Multiplier
  • Outstanding Functionality
  • Amazing Overclocking Capability
  • Future Proof Technology
  • Power
  • Knocks the socks of all other processors in audio
  • Image and video encoding
  • Blindingly Fast Media Encoding
  • MultiThreading and MultiTasking Demon
  • Compatible with some LGA775 Platforms
  • Four Core 2 processors in one package
  • Good overclocking potential
  • Tremendous performance on multithreaded applications.
  • Major leap in performance on multitasking and most multithreaded applications compared to high-end dual-core CPUs
  • Lots of apparent headroom for overclocking an already fast chip.
  • First commercially available quadcore CPU
  • Performance
  • Overclockability

The editors didn't like

  • Quite Expensive
  • High power requirements
  • No improvement in many programs as yet
  • Expensive
  • Only 2.66 GHz
  • Core 2 E6700level Gaming Performance
  • 130W TDP
  • Little gain in many applications
  • L2 cache not shared between the two Core 2 dies.
  • High price tag makes quad-core processing an elite technology for now
  • Apples twin dual-core Xeons in the Mac Pro make for a faster digital design configuration.
  • Price
  • Heat output
  • Stock HSF

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: neoseeker.com

  • Ok, I admit, that was a lot of test results to go through. But what is my overall opinion? Kentsfield, the QX6700, is a very interesting product, which will greatly benefit those that use highly multithreaded applications that can make good use of the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: firingsquad.com

  • Abstract:  Up until a few years ago, clock speed was the number one barometer used by many to judge a CPU’s performance. It was a pretty simple formula: higher CPU clock speeds means better performance. With their Netburst Pentium 4 architecture, Intel in part...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-10-31, review by: hardwareunboxed.com

  • Well those that doubted the virtues of dual-core technology will most likely keep to themselves now, after seeing what not only the Conroe can do but also the new Kentsfield, the evidence is overwhelming. Of course applications, namely games that do no...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-10-31, review by: hwupgrade.com

  • Abstract:  Earlier this year, Intel unleashed their Conroe line of processors aimed towards the desktop PC market. After lagging behind AMD for quite some time, Conroe gave Intel the chance to pull ahead in terms of performance and cost. In the end, Conroe is a ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-09-28, review by: pcper.com

  • The numbers we got here are impressive as we can see as much as 81% performance boosts in the POV-Ray benchmark by moving from a dual core processor to a quad core processor at a lower frequency. Since these systems were provided by Intel and we didn...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-09-28, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Abstract:  With many gamers and enthusiasts still drooling and desiring the Intel Conroe and Allendale processors that just came out this past July we find ourselves at an interesting point in time in the hardware industry. Exactly two months to the day that C...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-01-16, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • Abstract:  Performance per watt has taken a backward step, but it?s very fast with the right apps.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-01-10, review by: atomicmpc.com.au

  • Abstract:  Are we here already? It was just on four months ago that we looked at Core 2 Duo, and we were blown away. Now suddenly we already have two more cores for the taking.Sure, it’s just two Duos whacked on the one silicon slab, thus not using a shared ca...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-06, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Major leap in performance on multitasking and most multithreaded applications compared to high-end dual-core CPUs, Lots of apparent headroom for overclocking an already fast chip
  • High price tag makes quad-core processing an elite technology for now, Apples twin dual-core Xeons in the Mac Pro make for a faster digital design configuration
  • If you thought dual cores were over the top, get ready. Intel presents the Core 2 Extreme QX6700, a single CPU with four distinct processing cores. The first quad-core CPU will remain an enthusiast part for a while, but as a glimpse of the future, it...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(87%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-05, review by: tweaktown.com

  • Dual and Multiple cores are certainly the way to go. Speeds have hit a wall, going for a Gigahertz advantage simply isn’t enough, Intel found that out with the Pentium 4, a pure GHz speed king.Intel has been the first to market with its Dual Core pr...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×