us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i3 530 2.93GHz Socket 1156



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i3 530 2.93GHz Socket 1156

Testseek.com have collected 44 expert reviews of the Intel Core i3 530 2.93GHz Socket 1156 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i3 530 2.93GHz Socket 1156.
Award: Most Awarded March 2010
March 2010
 
(80%)
44 Reviews
Users
(91%)
445 Reviews
80 0 100 44

The editors liked

  • Speedy for the price
  • Decent on-chip graphics
  • Inexpensive
  • "Northbridge" module integration
  • New 32 nm process node
  • Low power consumption and heat output
  • Exceptional performance for a Dual Core processor
  • Overclocking potential

The editors didn't like

  • Not as fast as AMD's similarly priced offering
  • Requires newest motherboard chipsets to enable on-chip graphics
  • Quad core price tag for dual core processor
  • Memory and PCIE controller not in processor core
  • Older generation memory controller
  • No IGP control on P55 boards
  • Half of the Clarkdale chip is pure waste for gamers

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-02-03, Author: Ali , review by: wccftech.com

  • Abstract:  Intel, aka chipzilla, has been ruling the performance desktop processor market for what has been an age. Ever since the debacle that Pentium IV was (at least all Pentium IVs beyond Northwood), Intel has not looked back. It check mated AMD with its Core ar...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-23, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-26, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  The CPU landscape is really complex. Both AMD and Intel offer tons of different models. But how would today’s processors perform if they didn't ......

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-07-02, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  If you have between USD 115 and USD 120 to spend on a CPU, you have two choices, the Athlon II X4 640 (which is a quad-core CPU running at 3 GHz) or the Core i3 530 (which is a dual-core CPU running at 2.93 GHz). Which one should you buy? That is what ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-05-10, review by: fudzilla.com

  • Abstract:  While a comparable AMD system is a tad cheaper, AMD does not cripple it's chipset and CPUs as much as Intel does. By cost per performance the performance as you have seen is on par, even hyperthreading on the i3 does work well. What is surprising, AMD can cope with Intel even in idle power consumption. As you can see, Intel and AMD are pretty close, but wit..

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-04-05, review by: tomshardware.com

  • While we’ve often seen so-called CPU bottlenecks impeding the performance of our multi-GPU systems, today’s highest-quality gaming test has proven that when it comes to single-GPU systems, even a high-performance card like the Radeon HD 5850 can’t outs...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-03-11, review by: it-review.net

  • Abstract:  It's been awhile since Intel introduced any kind of "Extreme" edition CPU's. The new Core i7 980X represents just that - a new CPU that's supposed to be the fastest, the meanest, the conqueror, the benchmark for all others.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-03-04, review by: pcper.com

  • At the conclusion of my first Clarkdale article I stated this:The exception to this?  Extreme low cost requirements.  You can get aCore i3 processor for $113 that will give you similar levels of CPUperformance but without the Turbo Mode features.  You sti...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-02-24, review by: pcmag.com

  • Abstract:  Editor's Note: Product not yet tested. The following description is from the manufacturer.Upgrade your system with the Core i3-530 and own the processor that speeds up when you do. This CPU features the "Intel graphics technology" with "Intel Clear Vid...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×