us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i5 661 3.33GHz Socket 1156



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i5 661 3.33GHz Socket 1156

Testseek.com have collected 116 expert reviews of the Intel Core i5 661 3.33GHz Socket 1156 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i5 661 3.33GHz Socket 1156.
Award: Most Awarded January 2010
January 2010
 
(79%)
116 Reviews
Users
(88%)
76 Reviews
79 0 100 116

The editors liked

  • Dual Core Performance with HyperThreading
  • Turbo Boost Technology
  • Optimized for Windows 7
  • HD Graphics and CPU all in One
  • Multiple Display Capable
  • Great Overclockability for a “media chip”
  • Price Point
  • Lower Wattage and Temps than the Bloomfeild
  • Stock Heatsink Temps
  • All in One Solution
  • HD Playback
  • Impressive Scores
  • New Innovation is Always a Pro
  • Availability
  • Excellent Performance for the Dollar
  • Very Affordable
  • Lower Thermal Output
  • Turbo Technology
  • Cheaper Dual Channel Memory Support
  • Excellent Overclocking Potential (Stay Tuned)
  • Good Performance
  • Low Power Consumption
  • 32nm CPU Core
  • On-Chip DX10 Graphics
  • Solid Multimedia Capabilities
  • First Intel 32nm CPU
  • Really low power
  • Decent performance
  • 32 nm CPU
  • Plenty of computation power
  • GPU integrated in the CPU
  • 45 nm GPU
  • HDMI Audio bitstreaming supported
  • Full acceleration for Blu-Ray decode
  • Compact
  • Allows even smaller systems to be built
  • Good performance
  • Turbo Boost technology
  • HyperThreading technology
  • Integrated GPU provides excellent Windows Aero and HD content performance
  • 32nm process gives great overclocking headroom
  • Low power draw (when not overclocked)
  • Excellent speed for a dual-core CPU
  • Decent integrated graphics built-in
  • Inexpensive
  • Overclocks well
  • Intel HD Gfx integrated
  • Great Dual Core Performance
  • Seamless Blu-Ray Playback
  • Mainstream Price
  • On-die graphics are here
  • Eliminating the need for a separate video card or motherboard integrated graphics
  • Perfect for HTPC or non-gaming rig
  • Excellent overclocker

The editors didn't like

  • None
  • Slight OC Speckling
  • Nvidia not Allowed to Come Play (for now)
  • Socket 1156 Motherboard Upgrade Needed
  • Different CPU cooler Needed (in most cases)
  • Questionable Pricing
  • IGP Still Not Great For 3D Gaming
  • Confusing Naming Scheme
  • Integrated GPU seems to affect overclocking initially
  • As expected
  • Extremely limited GPU performance
  • Lots of rendering issues in games due to drivers
  • No support for Anti Aliasing
  • No noteworthy reduction in power consumption
  • No dual-link DVI output
  • High price
  • No support for DirectX 10.1
  • 11
  • No support for CUDA
  • Phy
  • Overpriced for the level of performance provided
  • Integrated GPU inadequate for even lowend gaming
  • Requires new motherboard to use integrated GPU
  • Very high power draw when overclocked
  • IGPU requires 32M128M of memory for a frame buffer
  • Relationship bet...
  • Requires newest motherboard chipset for graphics support
  • Confusing model designation
  • Not suitable for more than light Video Editing
  • None as long as the processor isn't used for 3D gaming

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 12 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-01-06, review by: hwt.dk

  • Intel har med sin nye serie åbnet op for et ret nyt marked, nemlig mediecentre, og bare på dette punkt er der tale om et yderst potent produkt. Sammenligner man, lidt unfair, med resten af i5 serien falmer ydelse vs pris forholdet lidt, men det...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-12-24, Author: Sebastian , review by: purepc.pl

  • Zastanawiacie się godzinami jaki procesor wybrać? Planujecie modernizację komputera? Test 100 procesorów Intel i AMD powinien pomóc Wam dokonać optymalnego wyboru.Jaki procesor do zwykłych zadań?Osoby wykorzystujące komputer do najprostszych zadań - przeg...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-13, Author: Gi3r3k , review by: purepc.pl

  • Z naszych testów wyraźnie wynika, że na chwilę obecną Intel dysponuje dość dużą przewagą nad AMD i nic dziwnego - Phenomy II pamiętają czasy Core 2 Duo i Quad, zaś architektura Bulldozer, na jakiej są oparte modele FX, cierpi na chorobę wieku dziecięcego,...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-11-04, Author: Jan , review by: svethardware.cz

  • Abstract:  Společnost AMD tedy nedávno svou nabídku procesorů o šest nových modelů, z nichž jsme si pět objednali pro náš dnešní srovnávací test a postavili proti nim stejný počet procesorů z nabídky Intelu, kde figurují dva Core i3, jeden Core i5 a dva Core i7....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-04, review by: extrahardware.cz

  • Abstract:  Generace Westmere alias 32nm Nehalemy alias procesory Clarkdale a Arrandale právě dnes začíná svůj život. Novinek je strašně mnoho: první procesory s grafickým jádrem (DX10) přímo na die, první 32nm procesory, první dvoujádrové Nehalemy, frekvence s Tu...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-09, review by: overclockzone.com

  • Abstract:  Intel Core i5 661 - Overclocking Performance on P55สวัสดีครับ...กับช่วงเวลาสบายๆในบ่ายวันเสาร์ซึ่งหลายๆท่านก็น่าจะกำลังพักผ่อนหลังจากเหนื่อยล้ากับการทำงานมาตลอดทั้งสัปดาห์ แต่บางท่านก็น่าจะยังทำงานกันอีกหนึ่งวันก่อนที่จะถึงวันหยุดในวันพรุ่งนี้ แต่สำหรับเร...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 12 of 12 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×