us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i5 661 3.33GHz Socket 1156



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i5 661 3.33GHz Socket 1156

Testseek.com have collected 116 expert reviews of the Intel Core i5 661 3.33GHz Socket 1156 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i5 661 3.33GHz Socket 1156.
Award: Most Awarded January 2010
January 2010
 
(79%)
116 Reviews
Users
(88%)
76 Reviews
79 0 100 116

The editors liked

  • Dual Core Performance with HyperThreading
  • Turbo Boost Technology
  • Optimized for Windows 7
  • HD Graphics and CPU all in One
  • Multiple Display Capable
  • Great Overclockability for a “media chip”
  • Price Point
  • Lower Wattage and Temps than the Bloomfeild
  • Stock Heatsink Temps
  • All in One Solution
  • HD Playback
  • Impressive Scores
  • New Innovation is Always a Pro
  • Availability
  • Excellent Performance for the Dollar
  • Very Affordable
  • Lower Thermal Output
  • Turbo Technology
  • Cheaper Dual Channel Memory Support
  • Excellent Overclocking Potential (Stay Tuned)
  • Good Performance
  • Low Power Consumption
  • 32nm CPU Core
  • On-Chip DX10 Graphics
  • Solid Multimedia Capabilities
  • First Intel 32nm CPU
  • Really low power
  • Decent performance
  • 32 nm CPU
  • Plenty of computation power
  • GPU integrated in the CPU
  • 45 nm GPU
  • HDMI Audio bitstreaming supported
  • Full acceleration for Blu-Ray decode
  • Compact
  • Allows even smaller systems to be built
  • Good performance
  • Turbo Boost technology
  • HyperThreading technology
  • Integrated GPU provides excellent Windows Aero and HD content performance
  • 32nm process gives great overclocking headroom
  • Low power draw (when not overclocked)
  • Excellent speed for a dual-core CPU
  • Decent integrated graphics built-in
  • Inexpensive
  • Overclocks well
  • Intel HD Gfx integrated
  • Great Dual Core Performance
  • Seamless Blu-Ray Playback
  • Mainstream Price
  • On-die graphics are here
  • Eliminating the need for a separate video card or motherboard integrated graphics
  • Perfect for HTPC or non-gaming rig
  • Excellent overclocker

The editors didn't like

  • None
  • Slight OC Speckling
  • Nvidia not Allowed to Come Play (for now)
  • Socket 1156 Motherboard Upgrade Needed
  • Different CPU cooler Needed (in most cases)
  • Questionable Pricing
  • IGP Still Not Great For 3D Gaming
  • Confusing Naming Scheme
  • Integrated GPU seems to affect overclocking initially
  • As expected
  • Extremely limited GPU performance
  • Lots of rendering issues in games due to drivers
  • No support for Anti Aliasing
  • No noteworthy reduction in power consumption
  • No dual-link DVI output
  • High price
  • No support for DirectX 10.1
  • 11
  • No support for CUDA
  • Phy
  • Overpriced for the level of performance provided
  • Integrated GPU inadequate for even lowend gaming
  • Requires new motherboard to use integrated GPU
  • Very high power draw when overclocked
  • IGPU requires 32M128M of memory for a frame buffer
  • Relationship bet...
  • Requires newest motherboard chipset for graphics support
  • Confusing model designation
  • Not suitable for more than light Video Editing
  • None as long as the processor isn't used for 3D gaming

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 6 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-01-20, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Excellent overall performance, Hyperthreading, Turbo mode, Moderate energy consumption
  • Very low performance graphics chip

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-14, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • With the Core i5-661, Intel has released a CPU that can just about do it all: it's a CPU, graphics controller, memory controller and PCI Express controller in one. It performed fast during our tests and its integrated graphics and reasonably cool runn...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-04, review by: HEXUS.net

  • Abstract:  Intel is a company that makes computer chips. Millions upon millions of computer chips that end up powering the vast majority of server, desktop, and mobile machines sold today.Intel also likes to be in total control of the entire chip-making proces...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-04, review by: v3.co.uk

  • Integrated GMA HD graphics processor means fewer fans; decodes AVC and VC1 video
  • Requires suitable motherboard to use graphics; uses newer and expensive DDR3 memory
  • Ideal for media computers, but otherwise pick the i5-750 Good points Integrated GMA HD graphics processor means fewer fans; decodes AVC and VC1 video Bad points Requires suitable motherboard to use graphics; uses newer and expensive DDR3 memory ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-04, review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Core i5-661 and H55/H57It is hard not to be impressed by Intel’s latest CPU/GPU and Chipset launch. They have taken the already very impressive Core range of processors, created a high performing dual core model and added to it an integrated graphic...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-04, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • A decent dual-core processor with integrated graphics, but true quad-core models are available for less. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-04, review by: computeractive.co.uk

  • Integrated GMA HD graphics processor means fewer fans; decodes AVC and VC1 video,
  • Requires suitable motherboard to use graphics; uses newer and expensive DDR3 memory
  • Ideal for media computers, but otherwise pick the i5-750...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Four months ago, I called Intel’s Lynnfield design the company’s mainstream magnum opus. The Core i5-750, specifically, rose to the top of our test lab’s pile of processors as a solid performer, overclocker, and overall value at less than $200. But is ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, review by: techradar.com

  • Fab dual-core performance, Keeps Intel's 32nm transistors on track
  • Mediocre GPU performance, Doubts about CPU-GPU fusion tech

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, review by: techradar.com

  • Great performance for a dual-core chip
  • Too expensive, Horrible graphics stability, CPU-GPU combo is a worry for thermals

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 6 of 12 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×