us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i7 950 3.06GHz Socket 1366



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 950 3.06GHz Socket 1366

Testseek.com have collected 37 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 950 3.06GHz Socket 1366 and the average rating is 95%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 950 3.06GHz Socket 1366.
 
(95%)
37 Reviews
Users
(95%)
1177 Reviews
95 0 100 37

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-03-31, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  Let's show the basic specs of all Core i7 processors released to date in a series of quick-reference tables. The Core i7 was the first Intel processor to bring an integrated memory controller, feature available on AMD processors since the Athlon 64. In...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-12-16, Author: Dan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • The Intel Core I7 950 is a beast of a processor! It was able to chew up and spit out everything we threw at it with a grin on it's face. Several of the tests even show the Intel Core I7 950 running neck and neck with the Intel Core I7 970! ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-12-13, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  As you well know, Intel Core i7-900 processors for the LGA1366 socket are not the only Core i7 products in the market. Lynnfield-based solutions for the LGA1156 socket have been selling for over a year now in the mainstream segment, and far better at t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-12-02, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Abstract:  Recently we have begun to publish a series of reviews with the results of a comprehensive test of modern CPUs we did in our test labs. Right now you can read two articles on that topic: CPU Benchmark, Part 1: Value Processors CPU Benchmark, Part 2: Mai...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2010-11-10, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • We're struggling to draw a firm conclusion about the Core i7-950. It's a fraction more expensive than the i7-930 and a fraction quicker in real world tasks; you're basically getting exactly what you're paying for. We had problems overclocking our i7-95...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-10-13, review by: overclock3d.net

  • Reviewing something like the i7-950 is one of the hardest things we do.It's not that the actual benchmarking process is hard, or that the performance isn't breathtaking. Because the performance is breathtaking.The problem is the obvious brilliance of it.T...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2009-08-01, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • We tried to make our tests at least a tad more interesting by using different memory modes -- and we found out that this parameter does not affect results. The only result that stands out against the common background is demonstrated by Core i7 920, b...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-06-17, review by: pcgameshardware.com

  • The Core i7-950 is - unsurprisingly - faster than the Core i7-940, but the comparatively small advantage in games compared to the Core 2 Quad Q9650 and the Phenom II X4 955 BE doesnt justify an upgrade. If you build a new system you should rather tak...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-06-04, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Nothing interesting, we just found another proof that any memory technology gets more or less interesting from 133MHz on (e.g. DDR-266, DDR2-533, DDR3-1066). But its active usage starts from 166MHz on (DDR-333, DDR2-667 and, finally, DDR3-1333). That...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-06-03, review by: anandtech.com

  • Abstract:  Seven months have passed since Intel officially launched its Core i7 processors, and for seven months they have remained at the top of our performance charts. Albeit pricey, Nehalem can’t be beat; it is the world’s fastest desktop microprocessor.Just ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×