Testseek.com have collected 344 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
June 2015
(85%)
344 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
850100344
The editors liked
Vega 64 is slightly slower than the GTX 1080
While the liquid cooled version wins more than it loses against the GTX 1080
Efficient cooler
Back plate
Quiet fans
Excellent option for QHD gaming
Compact for a high-end card geared toward 4K gaming output
Runs quiet and cool
Thanks to bundled radiator and fan
Roughly matches Nvidia's GeForce GTX 980 Ti at 4K and high settings
Great Performance
Relatively Quiet
More Efficient Than Its Predecessors
Innovative Memory Technology
Competitive Pricing
Great performance
Competitive pricing
Bang-for-buck
Improved power efficiency over Radeon 300 series
Open-world
Gorgeous Visuals and impressive Graphics on PC
Polished PC Performance with Mod Support
Modern Combat is fun and engaging
All Current and Future DLC supported
Best performance
excellent power consumption
Overclocking
Dead silent
Great performance at 4K
Low gaming noise
Compact form factor
Low temperatures
Power efficient gaming
HBM memory
Tons of bandwidth
Multi-monitor power consumption greatly improved
Backplate included
ZeroCore power
Dual-BIOS
Support for AMD FreeS
Performance is competitive with the GTX 980 Ti and AMD's HBM allows for a compact design that runs exceptionally cool and quiet with the bundled liquid cooler.
Excellent for HD and 1440p PC gaming
Superb cooling system
Very efficient design for minimized noise and heat
New Fiji processor
Compact design
The editors didn't like
Poor availability and thus pricing. AMD's aircooled RX Vega 64 reference card is ~5% slower than the GTX 1080 FE despite being hotter
Louder and using more power (though we have high hopes for custom cards)
Power
Overclocking
Size
Overall performance slides in just behind Nvidia's competing card
Especially at lower resolutions
Radiator complicates installation
Takes up space gained by smaller card
Lack of HDMI 2.0 port makes card an iffy choice for gaming on a 4K HDTV
Not A Clear Victory Over GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Competitive Pricing
But Still Kind Of Pricey
Only 2 board partner releases
HBM Memory not overclockable yet
Repetitive Side quests may get tedious
Linear gameplay at the end of the game
Story issues with pacing and confusing
Slower than expected in sub-4K resolutions
Pump emits permanent high-pitched whine
Some coil noise
Could be much quieter in idle
4 GB of VRAM
Lack of HDMI 2.0
No memory overclocking
Radiator takes up extra space
No DVI / analog VGA outputs
Being out of stock online might be the Fury X's biggest obstacle
Though the GTX 980 Ti is a better value in raw price vs. performance
Let's bring it all back home and summarize from a monetary perspective. Those spending the cash to build a custom enthusiast gaming system with a 4K or better display will pay for the GPU hardware to back that up. If you are aiming for gaming at 4K or abo...
Abstract: When AMD launched its Fiji-based graphics cards, all eyes were focused on its performance in consumer applications such as computer games. And while the first results forced Nvidia to launch “Titan Lite” in the form of GeForce GTX 980 Ti, DirectX 12 bench...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2015-08-07, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Abstract: Unleashed earlier this year, Nvidia's 3072 CUDA Core GTX Titan X was every enthusiast's dream until it was overshadowed by the GTX 980 Ti a few months later. Although the GTX 980 Ti is slower, it lets power users enjoy 4K gaming for $650 versus $1,000 for...
Abstract: About a month ago, just two weeks after its flagship Radeon R9 Fury X launch, AMD launched its little sibling, the R9 Fury positioned as a big money-maker for the
Abstract: AMD's new "Fiji" GPU debuted just weeks ago in the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X, a compact card with watercooling that's built exclusively by AMD. Following that, we saw the release of the Radeon R9 Fury, a regular full-sized card that's not built by AMD, but it...
Published: 2015-07-11, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net
The Fury X has been a challenging video card to review. This is AMD's best attempt at competition and, as it so happens, the card includes two items of critical importance A new GPU architecture and the world's first implementation of high-bandwidth memor...
Efficient cooler, Back plate, Quiet fans, Excellent option for QHD gaming
Power, Overclocking, Size
AMD's cut down Fiji GPU has proved to be great competition for Nvidia's GTX 980 and even knocks on the door of the more expensive GTX 980 Ti in some tests. Even with fewer texture units and shader cores the Radeon R9 Fury performs very close to as good...
Published: 2015-07-10, Author: Jason , review by: hothardware.com
Great performance, Competitive pricing, Bang-for-buck, Improved power efficiency over Radeon 300 series
Only 2 board partner releases, HBM Memory not overclockable yet
While the Radeon Fury X was a gorgeously designed and cool-running piece of hardware that introduced some much-needed new technologies into the fold, it fell a bit short with performance expectations. The air-cooled Radeon Fury, however, once again shows...
Published: 2015-07-10, Author: Bruno , review by: reviewstudio.net
best performance, excellent power consumption, overclocking, dead silent
In the end, AMD Fury X can't beat the GTX 980 Ti. A new driver may bring some extra performance but that's AMD's business. The overclockers' dream has some more steps to do for that title as the voltage can't be increased for now.NVIDIA also priced its 98...
Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only one card was allocated for Australian media. AMD was willing to help us out by buying a Fury X locally for us to test, so a b...
