Testseek.com have collected 344 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
June 2015
(85%)
344 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
850100344
The editors liked
Vega 64 is slightly slower than the GTX 1080
While the liquid cooled version wins more than it loses against the GTX 1080
Efficient cooler
Back plate
Quiet fans
Excellent option for QHD gaming
Compact for a high-end card geared toward 4K gaming output
Runs quiet and cool
Thanks to bundled radiator and fan
Roughly matches Nvidia's GeForce GTX 980 Ti at 4K and high settings
Great Performance
Relatively Quiet
More Efficient Than Its Predecessors
Innovative Memory Technology
Competitive Pricing
Great performance
Competitive pricing
Bang-for-buck
Improved power efficiency over Radeon 300 series
Open-world
Gorgeous Visuals and impressive Graphics on PC
Polished PC Performance with Mod Support
Modern Combat is fun and engaging
All Current and Future DLC supported
Best performance
excellent power consumption
Overclocking
Dead silent
Great performance at 4K
Low gaming noise
Compact form factor
Low temperatures
Power efficient gaming
HBM memory
Tons of bandwidth
Multi-monitor power consumption greatly improved
Backplate included
ZeroCore power
Dual-BIOS
Support for AMD FreeS
Performance is competitive with the GTX 980 Ti and AMD's HBM allows for a compact design that runs exceptionally cool and quiet with the bundled liquid cooler.
Excellent for HD and 1440p PC gaming
Superb cooling system
Very efficient design for minimized noise and heat
New Fiji processor
Compact design
The editors didn't like
Poor availability and thus pricing. AMD's aircooled RX Vega 64 reference card is ~5% slower than the GTX 1080 FE despite being hotter
Louder and using more power (though we have high hopes for custom cards)
Power
Overclocking
Size
Overall performance slides in just behind Nvidia's competing card
Especially at lower resolutions
Radiator complicates installation
Takes up space gained by smaller card
Lack of HDMI 2.0 port makes card an iffy choice for gaming on a 4K HDTV
Not A Clear Victory Over GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Competitive Pricing
But Still Kind Of Pricey
Only 2 board partner releases
HBM Memory not overclockable yet
Repetitive Side quests may get tedious
Linear gameplay at the end of the game
Story issues with pacing and confusing
Slower than expected in sub-4K resolutions
Pump emits permanent high-pitched whine
Some coil noise
Could be much quieter in idle
4 GB of VRAM
Lack of HDMI 2.0
No memory overclocking
Radiator takes up extra space
No DVI / analog VGA outputs
Being out of stock online might be the Fury X's biggest obstacle
Though the GTX 980 Ti is a better value in raw price vs. performance
Abstract: With the GeForce GTX TitanX NVIDIA has a very powerful pixel accelerator in its portfolio, which is really expensive at the same time. The AMD Radeon R9 FuryX is also a highly powerful graphics card but comes at a way more reasonable price. In this articl...
Abstract: At the start of September, Metal Gear Solid V: Phantom Pain was released, the newest installment in the Metal Gear series. For almost thirty years, this series has been made by the Japanese game developer Hideo Kojima in cooperation with distributor Kon...
Flawless 1080p and 1440p performance, Solid 4K framerates, Cheaper than flagship cards
High power consumption, Few board partner models available
If AMD and Nvidia's flagship cards are too expensive then the AMD Radeon R9 Fury is a good option for high-end gameplay. Be warned, though – its power consumption is high...
Published: 2015-07-12, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net
If you're looking for the cheapest single-chip GPU that can run a good proportion of games well at 4K resolution, the Radeon R9 Fury is a quality purchase. It's not far off the pace set by its bigger brother and it can be overclocked to match in most titl...
Published: 2015-07-03, Author: Allan , review by: kitguru.net
runs cool under load, super quiet fan, physically small, ideal for specific system builds, HBM is likely the future of GPU design, AMD's greatest single GPU card yet, strong 4K performance
pump noise, radiator takes up more space in case, coil whine is intrusive, minimal overclocking potential at this stage, the GTX980Ti is still the faster board, struggles to compete at 1440p, No HDMI 2.0 support.
The R9 Fury X 4GB is a positive move forward for AMD as it indicates the potential they have to produce small, powerful graphics cards – able to fit inside very small cases and system builds. HBM certainly seems to be tightly engrained into the future of...
Abstract: AMD introduced her new R7/R9 300 range of graphics cards on the 18th of June. We benchmarked the Radeon R7 370 2GB and 4GB, 380 2GB and 4GB as well as the Radeon R9 390 and 390X. We will not dive in to technical aspects and possibilities of the new ca...
Outstanding performance, Silent operation at low load levels, Almost 100% scaling in several tests, 4GB is definitely not a limiting factor,
Drivers proved problematic in some games, Early adopter premium, “This crossfire set-up isn’t for those with a small budget or small case or small power supply, but it is a seriously good option is you want to go 4K and take on a brand new technology with
PriceDue to the extremely limited availability of the graphics card, prices are set to fluctuate massively in the coming weeks. Currently you can pre-order an XFX model from Scan.co.uk for £546.62, however, in stock prices are as high as £649.99. In the U...
Published: 2015-06-25, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net
There have been some excellent deep dives on the make-up of the Fiji processor at the heart of the Radeon R9 Fury X - one of the best we've seen comes from The Tech Report, breaking down performance from individual components of the GPU and analysing thei...
AMD back in the big league, Competitively priced, Runs cool under load, Very quiet, Innovative HBM memory, Looks the business
Not quite as fast as GTX 980 Ti, 4GB may prove a hurdle at 4K, No overclocking on memory, No HDMI 2.0
AMD and Nvidia have taken contrasting approaches for designing premium graphics cards in mid-2015. Hampered by the problems associated with 20nm manufacturing, which was supposed to be prevalent by now, both companies have had to rework architectures for...
