Testseek.com have collected 236 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooled 8GB HBM2 PCIe and the average rating is 75%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooled 8GB HBM2 PCIe.
December 2017
(75%)
236 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
750100236
The editors liked
Vega 64 is slightly slower than the GTX 1080
While the liquid cooled version wins more than it loses against the GTX 1080
The SUPER RTX cards offer solid performance increases over the original cards with no price premium increase for the RTX 2070 SUPER. The RTX 2060 SUPER at $399 is almost the performance equal of the original RTX 2070 which launched at $499
Starting on J
The reference RX 5700 XT brings good features to $399 and it's faster than the RTX 2060 SUPER at the same price
New RDNA architecture brings higher performance per clock and per watt
New features include anti-lag technology for competitive gamers and im
High performance
Forward
The editors didn't like
Poor availability and thus pricing. AMD's aircooled RX Vega 64 reference card is ~5% slower than the GTX 1080 FE despite being hotter
Louder and using more power (though we have high hopes for custom cards)
No hardware ray tracing
Drivers are immature. Using WattMan caused many game lockups
Crashes to desktop
And restarts
We cannot judge the additional value a 50th Anniversary Special Edition brings which costs $50 more over the reference XT. The GPU i
Published: 2022-08-31, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Those were some interesting results and it certainly appeared from the 10+ games we just looked at that Vega 64 got the better of the GTX 1080. Of course, we did test 51 games in total, so we shouldn't jump to any conclusions just yetLet's check out t...
The reference RX 5700 XT brings good features to $399 and it's faster than the RTX 2060 SUPER at the same price, New RDNA architecture brings higher performance per clock and per watt, New features include anti-lag technology for competitive gamers and im
No hardware ray tracing, Drivers are immature. Using WattMan caused many game lockups, crashes to desktop, and restarts, We cannot judge the additional value a 50th Anniversary Special Edition brings which costs $50 more over the reference XT. The GPU i
7nm hardware and new architecture brings AMD Graphics to a higher playing field. If RDNA proves to be as solid as GCN, it will become the building blocks for the next console generation and several more generations of Radeon PC graphics. Unfortunately...
Abstract: This overclocking showdown is a follow-up to the RTX 2060 SUPER Founders Edition (FE) review where we are now focusing on its overclocked performance versus the overclocked liquid-cooled RX Vega 64. Today, we have optimized and maxed-out our RTX 2060 SUP...
The SUPER RTX cards offer solid performance increases over the original cards with no price premium increase for the RTX 2070 SUPER. The RTX 2060 SUPER at $399 is almost the performance equal of the original RTX 2070 which launched at $499, Starting on J
If you are buying a fast video card right now and looking for excellent ultra 1920×1080 and/or 2560×1440 performance, the new SUPER cards offer solid upgraded performance over the originals.We would like to award the RTX 2070 SUPER and the RTX 2060 SUPER...
Abstract: It has been nearly two years since BTR compared the GTX 1080 versus the RX Vega 64 in VR, and this time we have added the RTX 2070. This is a follow-up to our April VR evaluation where we saw the Turing RTX 2080 move ahead of the Pascal GTX 1080 Ti in VR...
Abstract: This overclocking showdown is a follow-up to the RTX 2070 8GB Founders Edition (FE) review where we are now focusing on the performance of the liquid-cooled RX Vega 64, AMD's current flagship. Today, we have optimized and maxed-out our RTX 2070 FE and RX...
Published: 2018-04-03, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Abstract: The initial performance of AMD's new Radeon RX Vega 56 may have looked a little lackluster at launch if you were expecting it to exceed the strides made by Nvidia's year-old GTX 10 series...
Being so far after the original launch I think most people know about most of the pros and cons of Vega 64. I'm really excited to see AMD back in the high-end GPU market even if they didn't manage to match the performance of the relatively old GTX 108...
Abstract: For Team Red fans, or just fans of competition, it has been a very long wait for AMD's response to NVIDIA's GeForce 10 Series. But in the weeks and months leading up to the August 14th launch of AMD's first high-end GPU since the likes of the Radeon R9 Fu...
Was this review helpful?
(60%)
Published: 2017-08-25, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Vega 64 is slightly slower than the GTX 1080, while the liquid cooled version wins more than it loses against the GTX 1080
Poor availability and thus pricing. AMD's aircooled RX Vega 64 reference card is ~5% slower than the GTX 1080 FE despite being hotter, louder and using more power (though we have high hopes for custom cards)
