us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Harddrives » SSD » Intel 2.5 inch 320 Series SATA300



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel 2.5 inch 320 Series SATA300

Testseek.com have collected 110 expert reviews of the Intel 2.5 inch 320 Series SATA300 and the average rating is 73%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel 2.5 inch 320 Series SATA300.
 
(73%)
110 Reviews
Users
(85%)
3048 Reviews
73 0 100 110

The editors liked

  • Good Performance
  • Competitive Pricing
  • Security and Reliability Features
  • Excellent throughput for SATA 3Gb/sec
  • Excellent build quality
  • Ground breaking IOPS
  • Beating out 6Gb/sec solutions at lower queue depths
  • Competitive pricing (see below)
  • 1.5-2x the performance of a single SSD 320
  • No surprises
  • Increased security features. Inexpensive compared with other recent drives.
  • Strong overall performance
  • 128-bit Encryption
  • Keeps data safe from power loss
  • 5 year warranty
  • Free SSD Migration software available from Intel's website
  • Supports TRIM
  • Nice looking
  • Rugged metal case
  • Capacities available from 40GB600GB
  • Delivers nearly 20K IOMeter IOPS performance
  • Outstanding 283/175 MBps read/write speed with ATTO
  • Builtin 128bit AES data encryption
  • Enhanced powerloss data protection
  • 5Year Intel product warranty support
  • Lightweight compact storage solution
  • Resistant to extreme shock impact
  • Low power consumption may extend battery life
  • Competitive read/write performance
  • Good pricing
  • Robust.

The editors didn't like

  • Doesn't Clearly Outpace Some Much Older Drives
  • "Only" SATA II
  • It's a bit late to come out with a 'new' 3Gb/sec part
  • Performance still not impressive next to top-end single drives
  • Lacks support for 6Gbps SATA.
  • Competitors are faster
  • Doesn't support SATA 6Gb/s
  • Reliability issues
  • Only average performance
  • No support for SATA 6 Gbps
  • High price
  • Faster currentgeneration SSDs exist
  • Limited by 3Gb/s SATA
  • Late to the game
  • Randomwrite IOPS lag behind leaders.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-07-08, review by: techreaction.net

  • Pages: 2 ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-06-22, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Overall, we would say that the Intel SSD 320 Series 160 GB performed very well in our tests, even though the comparison drives performed better in a couple of them. This surprised us a little, as the Intel unit has a significantly lower maximum write s...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-06-22, review by: pcmag.com

  • Increased security features. Inexpensive compared with other recent drives.
  • Lacks support for 6Gbps SATA.
  • The successor to Intel's popular and powerful X25-M, the 300GB SSD 320 Series solid-state drive is a strong performer with some useful features—but its support for slower SATA II makes it seem a little old-fashioned in 2011. Buy it now...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-06-15, review by: benchmarkreviews.com

  • Capacities available from 40GB600GB, Delivers nearly 20K IOMeter IOPS performance, Outstanding 283/175 MBps read/write speed with ATTO, Builtin 128bit AES data encryption, Enhanced powerloss data protection, 5Year Intel product warranty support, Lightweight compact storage solution, Resistant to extreme shock impact, Low power consumption may extend battery life,
  • Faster currentgeneration SSDs exist
  • IMPORTANT: Although the rating and final score mentioned in this conclusion are made to be as objective as possible, please be advised that every author perceives these factors differently at various points in time. While we each do our best to ensure...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
 
  Published: 2011-06-07, Author: Anand , review by: anandtech.com

  • Abstract:  A year ago whenever I'd request an SSD for review I'd usually get a 128GB drive built using 3x nm 4GB 2-bit MLC NAND die. These days the standard review capacity is twice that as most drives ship with 25nm NAND, using 8GB die. Seeing a bunch of scores for...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-06-02, review by: itshootout.com

  • Overall the Intel 320 is an easy drive to recommend. It may lack the headline grabbing sequential transfer rates of the 510 series, but in other respects the drive is a match for its more illustrious and expensive stable mate. As with other Marvell bas...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-09, Author: Nathan , review by: maximumpc.com

  • Competitive read/write performance; good pricing; robust.
  • Limited by 3Gb/s SATA; late to the game; randomwrite IOPS lag behind leaders.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-27, review by: guru3d.com

  • The product is what it is though, a SATA2 based mid-ranger, it hovers in-between the SandForce 1200 series based products and the Indilinx solutions with anomalies up and downwards here and there.Overall that is a snazzy position to be in if I'll be total...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-03-31, review by: videomaker.com

  • Abstract:  Well, it's finally about to happen. Intel announced that they're getting into the world of high capacity drives by releasing a new line of solid-state drives all the way up to 600 gigabytes. The new drives are the third generation of Intel's SSD 320 Serie...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-29, review by: hothardware.com

  • Good Performance, Competitive Pricing, Security and Reliability Features
  • Doesn't Clearly Outpace Some Much Older Drives, "Only" SATA II
  • The Intel SSD 320 series 300GB drive proved to be one of the better performing SATA II drives we have tested. Overall, the SSD 320 series drive is faster than the previous-gen X25-M G2, especially in sequential write speeds. Versus the SandForce SF-12...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 2 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×