us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Harddrives » SSD » Intel 2.5 inch 320 Series SATA300



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel 2.5 inch 320 Series SATA300

Testseek.com have collected 110 expert reviews of the Intel 2.5 inch 320 Series SATA300 and the average rating is 73%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel 2.5 inch 320 Series SATA300.
 
(73%)
110 Reviews
Users
(85%)
3048 Reviews
73 0 100 110

The editors liked

  • Good Performance
  • Competitive Pricing
  • Security and Reliability Features
  • Excellent throughput for SATA 3Gb/sec
  • Excellent build quality
  • Ground breaking IOPS
  • Beating out 6Gb/sec solutions at lower queue depths
  • Competitive pricing (see below)
  • 1.5-2x the performance of a single SSD 320
  • No surprises
  • Increased security features. Inexpensive compared with other recent drives.
  • Strong overall performance
  • 128-bit Encryption
  • Keeps data safe from power loss
  • 5 year warranty
  • Free SSD Migration software available from Intel's website
  • Supports TRIM
  • Nice looking
  • Rugged metal case
  • Capacities available from 40GB600GB
  • Delivers nearly 20K IOMeter IOPS performance
  • Outstanding 283/175 MBps read/write speed with ATTO
  • Builtin 128bit AES data encryption
  • Enhanced powerloss data protection
  • 5Year Intel product warranty support
  • Lightweight compact storage solution
  • Resistant to extreme shock impact
  • Low power consumption may extend battery life
  • Competitive read/write performance
  • Good pricing
  • Robust.

The editors didn't like

  • Doesn't Clearly Outpace Some Much Older Drives
  • "Only" SATA II
  • It's a bit late to come out with a 'new' 3Gb/sec part
  • Performance still not impressive next to top-end single drives
  • Lacks support for 6Gbps SATA.
  • Competitors are faster
  • Doesn't support SATA 6Gb/s
  • Reliability issues
  • Only average performance
  • No support for SATA 6 Gbps
  • High price
  • Faster currentgeneration SSDs exist
  • Limited by 3Gb/s SATA
  • Late to the game
  • Randomwrite IOPS lag behind leaders.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 6 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-05-24, review by: pctuner.net

  • Abstract:  I hanno rapidamente destato l’interesse degli appassionati di tecnologia grazie alle loro prestazioni straordinarie. Queste unità vantano performance non raggiungibili con i dischi tradizionali anche quando configurati in sistemi RAID. Inoltre l’af...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-05-14, Author: Tommaso , review by: techstation.it

  • Prima di tirare le conclusioni facciamo una piccola premessa sul come abbiamo dovuto effettuare i vari test per dare dei risultati abbastanza ragionevoli. In primo luogo abbiamo utilizzato due piattaforme diverse a seconda dell'utilizzo delle connessioni ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-05, review by: cyberbloc.de

  • Abstract:  Intel ist ja dafür bekannt, seinen Produkten durchaus kreative Namen zu geben. Während die 320er-Serie Ihrer Solid-State-Laufwerke nach dem kleinen Örtchen Postville benannt wurde, hört die aktuelle Genration, 330 Series, auf den stimmigen Namen Maplec...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-01, Author: ssd-test.de , review by: ssd-test.de

  • Abstract:  Expert benchmark review...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-13, review by: tomshw.de

  • Abstract:  Unserer großer SSD-Vergleichstest geht in die zweite Runde. Nun sind aktuelle Flash-Laufwerke mit Kapzitäten zwischen 240 und 600 GB an der Reihe. In unserem SSD-Vergleichstest lassen wir insgesamt 73 Laufwerke gegeneinander antreten, davon nicht wenig...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-27, review by: hardware-mag.de

  • des Tests.Leistungsmäßig orientiert sich die 300 GB-Ausführung der SSD 320 von Intel am bereits zuvor getesteten Modell mit doppelter Speicherkapazität. Zwischen beiden Kontrahenten sind die Differenzen in den Benchmarks sehr gering, was sowohl für di...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-26, review by: pc-max.de

  • über die Intel SSD 320 Series zu ziehen bedarf der Beachtung vieler Aspekte. Beschränkt man dieses Flash-Laufwerk lediglich auf die Leistungsdaten, so wird jeder schnell sehen, dass die Performance-Krone für die Intel-SSD unerreichbar ist. Dem in die ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-29, review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  Die KandidatenIntel SSD 320In unseren letzten SSD-Artikeln haben wir Solid State Drives mit den aktuellen Controllern von Marvell und SandForce auf ihre Leistungsfähigkeit untersucht. Ein Controller, der in dieser Analyse bisher fehlte, ist der bekannt...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-14, Author: Tobias , review by: hartware.de

  • In Sachen Performance ist ein Urteil bezüglich der Intel SSD 320 Series nicht ganz so einfach. Im Vergleich zu den neuen Solid State Drives mit SATA 6 Gbit/s Schnittstelle kann die Intel natürlich nicht mithalten. Diese Tatsache war aber bereits nach de...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-05-30, review by: tweakpc.de

  • Bei der Performance Mittelmaß, aber dafür interessante FeaturesSchaut man sich die Performance der neuen SSD 320 von Intel an, so bleibt von den angekündigten Leistungssteigerungen beim Betrachten der bereinigten Testergebnisse wenig über. Zwar ist die...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×