us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Harddrives » SSD » OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 3 Series SATA600



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 3 Series SATA600

Testseek.com have collected 130 expert reviews of the OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 3 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 3 Series SATA600.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2011
June 2011
 
(80%)
130 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
80 0 100 130

The editors liked

  • IOPS scaling close to that of the faster Vertex 3
  • Asynchronous flash makes it fasterthan Vertex 3 in some workload scenarios
  • Lower cost
  • Price
  • Availability
  • Available in 60GB
  • 120GB and 240GB capacities
  • Excellent sequential read and write speeds
  • SATA 6Gb/s interface
  • Supports TRIM
  • SMART and NCQ
  • 3 year warranty
  • Reasonably priced
  • Good performance – MB/s Read and MB/s Write
  • The OCZ Agility 3 solid-state drive supports SATA 6Gbps and offers fast performance. The drive works in any SATA-based storage application and is relatively affordable
  • Nearly as fast as other SF2281 drives
  • Cheaper.
  • Delivers nearly 71K IOMeter IOPS performance
  • Outstanding 557/524 MBps read/write speed with ATTO
  • TCG OPAL security with 256bit AES encryption
  • SandForce SF2281 processor supports TRIM
  • SMART
  • And RAISE
  • DuraWrite technology extends NAND lifetime
  • Toplevel enthusiast operational I/O performance
  • 3Year OCZ product warranty support
  • 60/120/240GB highspeed SSD storage capacities
  • Lightweig
  • Good performance
  • SATA 6 Gbps support
  • Nice looking
  • Rugged metal case
  • 3.5" adapter included
  • Great performance
  • Price compared to the Vertex 3

The editors didn't like

  • IOPS at lower queue depths outpaced by Intel 320 Series
  • Asynchronous flash makes it slowerthan vertex 3 in some workload scenarios
  • Street price likely to be on the high side (see below)
  • Speed
  • Compatibility problems with some motherboards
  • Considerably slower with incompressible data
  • Does not include a 2.5" to 3.5" adapter bracket
  • Low results with incompressible data
  • The OCZ Agility 3
  • Though fast
  • Is noticeably slower than other SATA 6Gbps SSDs without being proportionaly cheaper. It's capped at only 240GB
  • Takes a long time to format
  • And doesn't come with a drive bay converter to fit in a place of a 3.5-inch hard d
  • Big slowdowns when writing incompressible data.
  • Some manufacturers offer fiveyear warranty
  • Expensive enthusiastlevel product
  • Lacks 3.5" drive tray adapter kit
  • Only 10% faster than 3 Gbps SSDs
  • Needs SATA 6 Gbps controller to perform best
  • Can not win price/performance
  • None that I found

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 13
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-01-06, Author: Andrew , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  The first mSATA-based SSDs we reviewed wowed us with diminutive dimensions, but not as much with performance. Today's best efforts are a lot more like their desktop equivalents, though. We round up 10 models between 64 and 256 GB and nail down a winner. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-09-15, review by: rbmods.com

  • Price, Availability
  • Speed, Compatibility problems with some motherboards
  • Despite having some initial compatibility problems with my Lenovo Thinkpad T61, OCZ Agility 3 proved to be quite a good SSD in its price-range. Performance was bit disappointing considering the numbers OCZ claimed it to be able, but then again in real...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-06-18, Author: Jared , review by: Overclockersonline.net

  • Good performance – MB/s Read and MB/s Write, 3 year warranty, Price
  • Low results with incompressible data

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-02-28, Author: Sam , review by: custompcreview.com

  • Overall, the OCZ Agility 3 120GB SSD performed admirably. It scored very well in 4K reads and writes which means as long as you aren't copying large movies or entire music collections around all day, you aren't really going to see much of a difference bet...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-09-26, review by: insidehw.com

  • Abstract:  Although things may not seem that way at the moment, we’re still hoping that the statement by a representative of one of the largest memory manufacturers in the world, saying that SSD prices will drop down to 1€/GB by the end of the year, will come tr...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-09-25, Author: Geoff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  The latest generation of SSDs is out in full force. Drives are widely available from a multitude of vendors, firmware issues have for the most part been resolved, and competition has driven prices dangerously close to dollar-per-gigabyte territory. If you...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-09-10, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Abstract:  SandForce’s is a story of success on the semiconductor market. A small team of experienced engineers in a very short time developed and put into production a solid state drive platform which has become one of the most popular among SSD makers as well a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-08-26, review by: tomshardware.com

  • We've added more SSDs to our database and observed a number of significant price changes in the past month. As a result, this months recommendations undergo a notable revamp. And to those of you waiting for a hierarchy table at the end, it's here! Deta...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-17, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Sadly, the OCZ Agility 3 240GB doesn't deliver on its claim of offering similar performance to a Vertex 3 for much less cash. While it's cheaper than the Vertex 3, its performance presents serious pitfalls, which are brought about by the use of asynchrono...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-10, Author: Nathan , review by: maximumpc.com

  • Nearly as fast as other SF2281 drives; cheaper.
  • Big slowdowns when writing incompressible data.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 1 of 13 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 13   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×