us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Harddrives » SSD » OCZ 2.5 inch Octane Series SATA600



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of OCZ 2.5 inch Octane Series SATA600

Testseek.com have collected 94 expert reviews of the OCZ 2.5 inch Octane Series SATA600 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for OCZ 2.5 inch Octane Series SATA600.
Award: Highest Rated December 2011
December 2011
 
(80%)
94 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
80 0 100 94

The editors liked

  • Extremely low latency
  • Beating Intel in most areas
  • Outstanding IOPS performance
  • Unseating SandForce (and Intel) in most areas
  • Available 1TB capacity ($$$)
  • Strong Read Performance
  • Fast boot times
  • Competitive Pricing
  • Consistent performance with different data types
  • Very good performance.
  • Silky smooth operation as a system drive
  • Excellent sequential reading and writing performance
  • Very good 4K random I/O performance at low queue depths
  • SATA 6Gbps support
  • TRIM support under Windows 7
  • Lightning fast access times
  • Completely silent
  • The OCZ Octane SSD offers a large amount of storage at a relatively low price. The drive supports SATA 3 (6Gbps)
  • Performs very well
  • Has up to 1TB of storage space
  • And works with all popular platforms
  • Including Windows
  • Mac OS
  • And Linux
  • Impressive 542/356 MBps read/write transfer speeds
  • Automatic AES data encryption
  • Indilinx Everest SSD processor supports TRIM garbage collection
  • 3Year OCZ product warranty support
  • Indilinx Ndurance technology extends NAND lifetime
  • 128/256/512GB highspeed SSD storage capacities
  • Lightweight compact storage solution
  • Resistant to extreme shock impact
  • Low power consumption may extend

The editors didn't like

  • Some cache tuning needed for better handling of mixed readwrite workloads
  • Some compatibility issues noted with nonnative chipsets (see below)
  • Write speeds below SansForce-based drives
  • Lower capacities have lower write performance
  • Expensive. Not routinely faster than competing drives. Has trouble with high-queue-depth writes
  • Writing speeds do not scale very well when queue depths rise.
  • The OCZ Octane SSD is comparatively slower in terms of data transfer speed than other SATA 3-based solid-state drives. The drive is significantly more expensive than traditional hard drives of the same capacity
  • Some manufacturers offer fiveyear warranty
  • Expensive enthusiastlevel product
  • Lacks 3.5" drive tray adapter kit

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 6 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-01-10, review by: hardware.fr

  • Avec l'Octane, OCZ prend une nouvelle envergure dans le domaine du SSD. Déjà à la pointe de l'innovation sur les SSD depuis maintenant 4 ans via des partenariats privilégiés avec Indilinx puis SandForce, OCZ est désormais à la base de la conception des...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-07-16, review by: tomshw.it

  • Abstract:  Sviluppare il controller di un SSD costa moltissimo, ed è un percorso pieno d'insidie. È normale quindi che molti produttori di drive preferiscano affidarsi a un fornitore esterno come Marvell o SandForce. Il rovescio della medaglia è che scegliere lo ste...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-20, Author: Andrew , review by: tomshw.it

  • Storage Bench v1.0 mischia operazioni casuali e sequenziali. È importante per isolare prestazioni casuali 4 KB, un'operazione che si fa davvero molto spesso. Dopo Storage Bench 1.0 abbiamo testato i prodotti con Iometer per verificare le prestazioni 4 KB ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-11, review by: nexthardware.com

  • Con la linea di SSD Octane, OCZ sta facendo un primo tentativo di ridurre la sua dipendenza dagli altri produttori per l'approvigionamento dei controller con cui equipaggiare i propri SSD.I risultati, guardando i test svolti sulle unità Octane da 512GB...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-06-08, Author: Marcel , review by: hw-journal.de

  • Vieles ist neu, vieles schon bekannt. Doch aber der Technologiesprung in OCZs Octane-Reihe ist durchaus als recht groß an zu sehen. Zum einen ist die Octane OCZs erster Datenträger, welcher mit einem Indilinx Controller ausgestattet ist. Des Weiteren sc...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-04-02, review by: tweakpc.de

  • übergehen. An die Leistung der Vertex 3 kommt die Octane nicht ganz heran, was bei gleichem Preis im direkten Duell für die Vertex 3 spricht. Man spürt förmlich den enormen Preisdruck der unter den nahezu baugleichen SandForce-SSDs herrscht. Und genau...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-04, review by: computerbase.de

  • PreisvergleichModell/Kapazität 60-64 GB 120-128 GB 240-256 GBKingston HyperX (bulk) – 170,03 € 327,70 €Adata S511 88,70 € 145,55 € 296,44 €Intel SSD 320 114,59 € (80 GB) 147,57 € 437,99 € (300 GB)Intel SSD 510 – 216 € 467,95 €Crucial M4 83,94 € 144,60 € 2...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-28, review by: Pcwelt.de

  • Abstract:  Ein weiteres besonders hochwertiges Modell der SSD-Laufwerke betritt den Ring: Die OCZ Octane SATA 3 SSD mit 512 GB konkurriert gegen High-End-Modelle wie die Intel SSD 510 und macht dabei eine glänzende Figur. Die OCZ Octane SATA 3 SSD liefert eine Sp...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-16, Author: Christian , review by: tecchannel.de

  • OCZs Octane mit Indilinx Everest kann bei typischen Alltagsszenarien den SSDs mit SandForce-2200-Controller meist das Wasser nicht reichen. Nichtsdestotrotz ist die Performance der Octane immer noch gut; Konkurrenten wie die Intel 510 oder Samsung 830 lie...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-16, review by: tomshw.de

  • Die Performance einer SSD wird durch drei Dinge bestimmt: den Controller, die Firmware und den Flash-Speicher. Von diesen drei Variablen hat der Controller wohl am meisten Einfluss auf die Performance. Wirklich viele Controller mit 6-Gb/s-Schnittstelle gi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×