us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Printers » Laserprinters » Samsung SCX-3205 Series



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung SCX-3205 Series

Testseek.com have collected 13 expert reviews of the Samsung SCX-3205 Series and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SCX-3205 Series.
 
(74%)
13 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
74 0 100 13

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-02-11, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • Compared to the Samsung ML-1915, the Samsung SCX-3205 has slightly disappointing paper handling facilities and costs considerably more. Running costs aren't quite as low as we'd like, but it does offer improved print quality and (in Best mode) speed. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-20, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Reasonable energy consumption both on standby and while printing, Quieter than average, Text is perfectly legible, 128 MB of memory: a good size for a small team, Ethernet and WiFi
  • Scanner best left for occasional use only because of its impact, First page takes a while when the printer was on standby, Grayscale gradients not always accurate, High running costs for a monochrome laser, Setting up WiFi could be made even easier
  • This printer didn't have any surprises in store for us: its affordable price means you get printing quality that could be improved on, have to wait a little while for your documents to arrive and have higher running costs. But it will certainly do the ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-29, review by: computeractive.co.uk

  • Decent printing and scanning but disappointing build quality ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-10, review by: gadgetspeak.com

  • Abstract:  Unless you need to print colour pages this is a very efficient way to work, I often need to print single pages this has virtually no warm up time. I scan single pages to print again very quick and finally email the signed page once scanned also very ef...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(88%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • A good-looking and affordable MFP that's let down only by slightly high running costs. The SCX-3205W is highly recommended for light printing duties. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-11-19, review by: itreviews.com

  • Packing in a whole host of features and with a price of just £129, it's hardly surprising Samsung looks to claw back some money in terms of replacement toner. While this will no doubt send those looking to print frequent large documents elsewhere, the ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2010-11-03, review by: v3.co.uk

  • Small; wired and wireless network connectivity; decent print quality; good value
  • High running costs; no auto-duplex feature
  • Despite its relatively low price, the SCX-3205W packs in a decent selection of features. It's primarily a single-user printer, but the inclusion of wired and wireless networking means it can be shared among a small workgroup if required. Its copy and ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-10-20, review by: alphr.com

  • Not an outstanding printer, but the compact all-in-one design gives it real home office appeal ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(67%)
 
  Published: 2010-10-14, review by: shopexplorer.com

  • There's plenty to enjoy about the Samsung SCX-3205W. The Print Screen and Eco-Print are sound and worthwhile features that you will struggle to find in other models of similar price. There are minor gripes about print quality - particularly in photo re...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-10-10, Author: Simon , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Samsung claims the SCX-3205 can reach print speeds of 16ppm and we have to say we believe it probably can. Our five-page text print managed 11.1ppm, but when we printed the 20-page document, it rose to 14.3ppm, so with longer documents or those with less...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×