us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Software » Mac Software » Apple Aperture 1.5



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Apple Aperture 1.5

Testseek.com have collected 12 expert reviews of the Apple Aperture 1.5 and the average rating is 73%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple Aperture 1.5.
 
(73%)
12 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
73 0 100 12

The editors liked

  • Excellent retouching tools in a streamlined interface
  • Delivers great results
  • Integrated color management.
  • Many bug fixes
  • More-flexible approach to supporting new Raw formats.

The editors didn't like

  • No Windows version
  • Relatively steep hardware requirements
  • Limited Apple support options
  • Restrictive file-management system
  • No curves view or editor.
  • Inadequate printed documentation
  • Needs more zoom options and keyboard shortcuts for adjustments
  • Adjusting large Raw-format images requires a fast Mac and a high-end video card.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-06-01, review by: tipa.com

  • Abstract:  Awarded by TIPA Association.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2007-04-11, Author: Lori , review by: cnet.com

  • Excellent retouching tools in a streamlined interface; delivers great results; integrated color management.
  • No Windows version; relatively steep hardware requirements; limited Apple support options; restrictive file-management system; no curves view or editor.
  • This raw work-flow application isnt the Holy Grail many hoped it would be, but Apple Aperture 1.5 could make life easier for photographers who need to cull, retouch, and output large numbers of photographs quickly and efficiently.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(76%)
 
  Published: 2007-02-01, review by: macworld.com

  • Many bug fixes; more-flexible approach to supporting new Raw formats.
  • Inadequate printed documentation; needs more zoom options and keyboard shortcuts for adjustments; adjusting large Raw-format images requires a fast Mac and a high-end video card.
  • With version 1.5.2, Aperture has hit its stride. Apple did a commendable job of listening to users’ requests and complaints, delivering seven updates within 12 months. While there’s room for Aperture to grow, version 1.5.2 brings the program e...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-05, review by: jordanitservices.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Stephen Schleicher For the photographer who needs to review images, make slight tweaks, or just wants to have their entire library of images at their fingertips; Apple’s Aperture 1.5 may be the solution. We’ve previously reviewed Aperture on...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-03, review by: barefeats.com

  • Abstract:  Thanks to suggestions by Aperture users, weve come up with at least three benchmarks. We used the sample RAW photos included with Aperture so that you can duplicate our tests on your own Mac. LEGEND of GRAPHS:Mac Pro (Rad1900) = Mac Pro 3GHz with 8GB ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-04-27, Author: Jim , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Many bug fixes, more flexible approach to supporting new Raw formats
  • Inadequate printed documentation, needs more zoom options and keyboard shortcuts for adjustments, adjusting large Raw-format images requires a fast Mac and a high-end video card
  • With Aperture 1.5.2, Apple has hit its stride. Apple did a commendable job of listening to users’ requests and complaints, delivering seven updates within 12 months. While there’s room to grow, Aperture 1.5.2 brings the program even closer to...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-01-16, review by: computerarts.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Aperture 1.5 Can Apple’s updated Raw manager silence its critics, and Adobe? When first introduced, Apple’s Aperture took a bit of flak for its ridiculously high hardware requirements and limited camera support, which is not the reaction you w...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-01-09, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Good looking interfce, creative options like book and website templates
  • Slow on less-powerful systems, confusing terminology, steep learning curve
  • Apple still has a way to go

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-23, review by: digitalartsonline.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Aperture 1.0 went further than any program in addressing the start-to-finish needs of advanced and professional photographers, but its strengths were offset by some design flaws, bugs, and stiff hardware demands. April’s Aperture 1.1 update partiall...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2006-10-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Almost a year to the day since its initial release, Aperture receives its fifth update, the first to move it beyond a subset of version 1.1. Although some were hoping - indeed predicting - that this would be a fullblown version 2 release, were not con...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×