us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Games » PC » Call of Duty: World at War



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Call of Duty: World at War

Testseek.com have collected 44 expert reviews of the Call of Duty: World at War and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Call of Duty: World at War.
Award: Good Buy November 2008
November 2008
 
(81%)
44 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
81 0 100 44

The editors liked

  • The basic Call of Duty combat model remains intact
  • Fantastic co-op mode and multiplayer options.
  • Intense action
  • Cinematic production values and a great multiplayer component
  • Lengthy singleplayer campaign is engaging
  • Fun coop mode.
  • ZOMBIES!
  • Good storyline
  • Great graphics
  • Bloody and gory
  • Gritty
  • Exciting story
  • Same excellent multiplayer system
  • Fourplayer cooperative campaign
  • Bayonets and flamethrowers
  • Nazi Zombies.

The editors didn't like

  • Solo campaigns get a little sloppy at times and often feel a bit generic.
  • Singleplayer suffers from a minor case of dejavu
  • Unimpressive AI
  • Tired setting
  • Makes us long for Call of Duty 4.
  • Back to WWII yet again
  • Familiar setting
  • Familiar game mechanics
  • Familiar guns.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-11-14, review by: videogamer.com

  • Nonstop action, Stunning presentation, Feature rich online modes, Going back to WWII will be tricky for some...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-12, review by: gamespot.com

  • Gritty, exciting story, Same excellent multiplayer system, Fourplayer cooperative campaign, Bayonets and flamethrowers, Nazi Zombies.
  • Familiar setting, Familiar game mechanics, Familiar guns.
  • World at War brings proven Call of Duty mechanics back to WWII with great success. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-11, Author: Sal , review by: gamespy.com

  • The basic Call of Duty combat model remains intact; fantastic co-op mode and multiplayer options.
  • Solo campaigns get a little sloppy at times and often feel a bit generic.
  • "60 million lives were lost as a result of World War II," reads a title card kicking off the end credits of Call of Duty: World at War. "It was the most destructive and deadliest conflict in human history." Its an odd way to end a game that spends mos...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-11, review by: gamezone.com

  • Abstract:  Not a huge departure in terms of how the game plays out. There is a rhythm to the levels, each with a hump that must be crested to begin the downhill run to the next level in the story arc. Overall the game feels a bit short but is not only a very tast...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-11, review by: 1up.com

  • Abstract:  After Call of Duty 3, many longtime series fans -- myself included -- were skeptical at the prospect of future Treyarch-developed titles. Call of Duty 3 disappointed a lot of players -- especially when Call of Duty creator Infinity Ward's Call of Duty ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(81%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-11, review by: gamepro.com

  • Intense action, cinematic production values and a great multiplayer component
  • Singleplayer suffers from a minor case of dejavu

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-11, review by: gameplaymonthly.com

  • the second chance mechanism could’ve been implemented better, but I suppose it works well enough. While it is true that the lack of objectives isn’t as large a problem in cooperative mode (though some missions will still test that), there are moments...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-10, review by: techolive.com

  • Abstract:  When Treyarch announced that their newest Call of Duty game would once again be set in World War II time period, people where skeptical and upset to say the least. Call of Duty 4 had been such an amazing hit. Why would they go back to a battle too ofte...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-08-19, review by: ign.com

  • Abstract:  It was bound to happen sooner or later; having seen Call of Duty: World at War about three or four times now, Activision finally let us have a chance to actually play the game, a World War II shooter built on the Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare engine. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-02-04, review by: atomicmpc.com.au

  • Hard to recommend amongst the recent crop of games....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(69%)
    page 2 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×