Testseek.com have collected 44 expert reviews of the Call of Duty: World at War and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Call of Duty: World at War.
November 2008
(81%)
44 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
81010044
The editors liked
The basic Call of Duty combat model remains intact
Fantastic co-op mode and multiplayer options.
Intense action
Cinematic production values and a great multiplayer component
Lengthy singleplayer campaign is engaging
Fun coop mode.
ZOMBIES!
Good storyline
Great graphics
Bloody and gory
Gritty
Exciting story
Same excellent multiplayer system
Fourplayer cooperative campaign
Bayonets and flamethrowers
Nazi Zombies.
The editors didn't like
Solo campaigns get a little sloppy at times and often feel a bit generic.
COD 5 is the first person shooter game that you should be playing this holiday season, especially if you like all Call of Duty games. COD 5 plays and looks similar to the previous Call of Duty game because of it using the same engine, but this means th...
Intense action, cinematic production values, a great multiplayer component
Single-player suffers from a minor case of deja vu
To call it Call of Duty 4 with a World War II skin is insulting to Treyarch because World at War is so much more than that. It’s a great follow up to Modern Warfare and proves that World War II is still a viscerally charged conflict to live through...
Based on the fabulous Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare engine. Spectacular multiplayer, and the option to search for games locally. Excellent change of scenery to WWII, very solid single-player. Co-op.
Single-player a little short, WWII setting wont appeal to all. Weighted very much towards online play (if this can be considered a bad thing).
Like its predecessors Call of Duty World at War belongs into every gamers collection. With the Call of Duty series Activision can nearly guarantee a good title and also with World at War you wont be disappointed. Interesting single player missions and...
Abstract: Many people were a little taken aback when it was announced that Call of Duty 5 would return back to a World War 2 setting in Call of Duty: World at War, however I’m someone who hadn’t played Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (and still haven’t got to pla...
Abstract: After a brief, but brilliant, journey to the present day with Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, this latest instalment of the long-running shooter series returns to its World War 2 roots. This is a surprising move considering Modern Warfares populari...
Shocking, chaotic and uberviolent. For those who can take it, there’s a fine game lurking despite the flaws. 7.9/10Print this pageUser reviews (1)Share this pageNoticed something wrong? Report error/mistake....
To call it Call of Duty 4 with a World War II skin is insulting to Treyarch because Call of Duty: World at War is so much more than that. Its a great follow up to Modern Warfare and proves that World War II is still a viscerally charged conflict to l...
Epic set pieces, Looks awesome, Killer voice acting, Offers tons of replayability, Brutal combat is a welcome addition to the CoD series
Feels a bit too much like Modern Warfare for its own good, Painfully dumb A.I, Single player campaign is too short
Finally we have WaW’s multiplayer component that’s nearly as awesome as Modern Warfare’s. Once again Treyarch have blatantly lifted 90% of MW’s features but then again, why fix something that isn’t broken? They’ve slapp...
