us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 275 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2017
June 2017
 
(88%)
275 Reviews
Users
(98%)
62 Reviews
88 0 100 275

The editors liked

  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Ryzen platform is very stable now
  • 6-cores
  • 12-threads
  • Fully unlocked
  • Comes with CPU cooler
  • Great performance compared to Intel's i5-8400
  • Low price
  • Bundled cooler
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Six cores and 12 threads for half the price of Intel's similarly outfitted Core i7-6800K
  • Consistently topped pricier Core i7-7700K on tests that take advantage of all available cores
  • Cooler included in the box (unlike with the Ryzen 5 1600X)
  • Beats Intel 7500 and Intel 7600K in multi-threaded apps
  • Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack)
  • Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation
  • Heatsink included
  • Platform updated to incl
  • Comes With SMT Which Core i5 CPUs Lack
  • Outstanding Performance
  • Fully Unlocked
  • Can Easily Be OC'd to 4Ghz+
  • Perfect For Multi-Tasking
  • Future-Proof Platform
  • Great Price/Performance Value
  • Runs Very Cool

The editors didn't like

  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Gaming performance still lacks
  • Single-threaded performance is still behind Intel
  • Performance in lightly threaded applications
  • Memory overclocking
  • 1080p gaming and single-core performance still lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips
  • Higher power draw than Intel CPUs
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Boost frequency significantly lower than on R
  • Memory Compatibility Limited

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-07-21, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • I have to admit, this just seems wrong. I still can't get used to seeing AMD CPUs consuming less power than their Intel counterpart. It feels unnatural. Those power-hungry FX chips sat atop our power charts for so long and I'm glad we can finally move on...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-14, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  To date, we have poured over, examined, and tested the tar out of the eight-core Ryzen 7 processors currently available, but among the four- and six-core Ryzen 5 mainstream CPUs, we've barely begun. So far we have reviewed the Ryzen 5 1600X. Now it's time...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2017-06-13, Author: Rafael , review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • We can say the Ryzen 5 1600 is a version of the Ryzen 5 1600X with a lower clock. Therefore, it behaves as expected: in programs and games that take advantage of its twelve threads, it performs greatly, but in programs that don't use more than four thread...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-05, Author: Silvio , review by: notebookcheck.net

  • Abstract:  AMD now takes on the mainstream segment with the Ryzen 5 1400 and Ryzen 5 1600. The hexa-core in particular performs well in our review, but the Ryzen 1400 is a bit on the fence – which is primarily a result of AMD's in-house competition...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-29, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Low price, Bundled cooler, Unlocked multiplier
  • Performance in lightly threaded applications, Memory overclocking
  • The Ryzen 5 1600 brings six cores and twelve threads at a great price point that places it in direct contention with Intel's four-core Kaby Lake lineup. - MORE: Best CPUs MORE: Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy MORE: All CPU Content...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-05-26, Author: Matt , review by: computershopper.com

  • Six cores and 12 threads for half the price of Intel's similarly outfitted Core i7-6800K, Consistently topped pricier Core i7-7700K on tests that take advantage of all available cores, Cooler included in the box (unlike with the Ryzen 5 1600X)
  • 1080p gaming and single-core performance still lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
  • At just $219 with six cores and 12 threads, AMD's Ryzen 5 1600 could be a cash-strapped content-creator's dream chip. Just don't expect to do serious overclocking without investing in a better cooler. Read More...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-22, Author: HP , review by: relaxedtech.com

  • Comes With SMT Which Core i5 CPUs Lack, Outstanding Performance, Fully Unlocked, Can Easily Be OC'd to 4Ghz+, Perfect For Multi-Tasking, Future-Proof Platform, Great Price/Performance Value, Runs Very Cool
  • Memory Compatibility Limited
  • The Ryzen 5 lineup has put an end to Intel's Core i5 lineup because you now have the option of getting either a 6C/12T or 4C/8T processor while the Core i5 lineup is all 4C/4T. Multi-threaded performance will be significantly better with any Ryzen 5 proce...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(97%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-19, Author: AMD , review by: neoseeker.com

  • Abstract:  Let's take a few moments and go back to August, 2016 when AMD announced the “ZEN” Core architecture (‘designed from the ground up with optimal balance of performance and power') at the Hot Chips 28 Symposium on High Performance Chips. At the Symposium, AM...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-16, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • Abstract:  AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Best value with AMD's 219 USD six-core proc.We put what could be the best value Ryzen 5 processor to the test as we benchmark the six-core Ryzen 5 1600 (without the X). The 1600 will be tested and overclocked to see how much value you can...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-16, Author: W1zzard , review by: techpowerup.com

  • Beats Intel 7500 and Intel 7600K in multi-threaded apps, Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack), Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation, Unlocked multiplier, Heatsink included, Platform updated to incl
  • Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips, Higher power draw than Intel CPUs, Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited, Setup complicated (memory, HPET, CCX, SMT, and power profile), Boost frequency significantly lower than on R
  • The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 currently retails for $220. Beats Intel 7500 and Intel 7600K in multi-threaded apps Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack) Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation Unlocked multip...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(93%)
    page 2 of 28 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×