us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 275 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2017
June 2017
 
(88%)
275 Reviews
Users
(98%)
62 Reviews
88 0 100 275

The editors liked

  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Ryzen platform is very stable now
  • 6-cores
  • 12-threads
  • Fully unlocked
  • Comes with CPU cooler
  • Great performance compared to Intel's i5-8400
  • Low price
  • Bundled cooler
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Six cores and 12 threads for half the price of Intel's similarly outfitted Core i7-6800K
  • Consistently topped pricier Core i7-7700K on tests that take advantage of all available cores
  • Cooler included in the box (unlike with the Ryzen 5 1600X)
  • Beats Intel 7500 and Intel 7600K in multi-threaded apps
  • Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack)
  • Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation
  • Heatsink included
  • Platform updated to incl
  • Comes With SMT Which Core i5 CPUs Lack
  • Outstanding Performance
  • Fully Unlocked
  • Can Easily Be OC'd to 4Ghz+
  • Perfect For Multi-Tasking
  • Future-Proof Platform
  • Great Price/Performance Value
  • Runs Very Cool

The editors didn't like

  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Gaming performance still lacks
  • Single-threaded performance is still behind Intel
  • Performance in lightly threaded applications
  • Memory overclocking
  • 1080p gaming and single-core performance still lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips
  • Higher power draw than Intel CPUs
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Boost frequency significantly lower than on R
  • Memory Compatibility Limited

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 28 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-06-12, Author: Michael , review by: hexatekno.com

  • Ryzen 5 1600 memiliki kemampuan CPU yang tergolong baik terutama apabila melihat dari segi harganya dan apabila dibandingkan dengan Ryzen 5 1400 yang sempat direview kemarin, Ryzen 5 1600 ini sebenarnya memiliki value yang lebih baik lagi.Dengan harga yan...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-19, Author: Rifan , review by: pemmzchannel.com

  • Melalui artikel ini pemmzchannel coba menyampaikan bahwa AMD Ryzen 5 ternyata sudah cukup baik untuk kegiatan professional, juga untuk gaming. Kendala pada dukungan RAM kami harap dapat diselesaikan secepatnya oleh pihak AMD jika masih ingin mendapat perh...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-04, Author: Rifan , review by: pemmzchannel.com

  • Melalui artikel ini pemmzchannel coba menyampaikan bahwa AMD Ryzen 5 ternyata sudah cukup baik untuk kegiatan professional, juga untuk gaming. Kendala pada dukungan RAM kami harap dapat diselesaikan secepatnya oleh pihak AMD jika masih ingin mendapat perh...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2020-06-29, review by: lag.vn

  • Core i3-9100F lõi tứ là khá tệ trong Battlefield V, Assassin Creed: Odyssey, The Division 2, và yếu trong Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Khi chơi các tựa game cũ hơn hoặc ít đòi hỏi hơn như Far Cry New Dawn, Core i3 đã làm tốt. Trong khi 1600 AF hoặc bất kỳ C...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-16, Author: darklord , review by: darktech-reviews.com

  • 1- دقة تصنيع أقل 14 نانو واستهلاك طاقة أقل من المنافس Intel, 2- استخدام الخيوط الوهمية SMT, 3- زيادة فى الأداء مقارنتاً بالجيل السابق واستهلاك طاقة اقل ما يقال عنة انه مبهر, 4- دعم ذواكر DDR4 بسرعات 3200, 5- تقنية XFR, 6- السعر الخاص بالمعالجات هو افضل ما
  • هذه المرة سيتم الأختبار بأستخدام احدث بايوس تجريبية صدرت لمعالجات Ryzen والتي قدمت اداء أفضل في الألعاب البايوس الخاصة بلوحات X370 لم تتاح حتي الأن
  • معالج AMD RYZEN 5 1600 بسعر 220 دولار بضع مفهوما جديدا للمقبلين علي شراء معالجات Core I5 لقضي علي تلك الفئة السعريةاما عن معالج 1400 فقدم أداء جيد جداً بسعر 170 دولار ليجعل معالجات انتل 7400 ليست الأفضل بهذا المبلغتعليق خاص بمعالج 1400: أداء معالج 1400 م...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 28 of 28 « Previous   1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×