us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 275 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2017
June 2017
 
(88%)
275 Reviews
Users
(98%)
62 Reviews
88 0 100 275

The editors liked

  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Ryzen platform is very stable now
  • 6-cores
  • 12-threads
  • Fully unlocked
  • Comes with CPU cooler
  • Great performance compared to Intel's i5-8400
  • Low price
  • Bundled cooler
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Six cores and 12 threads for half the price of Intel's similarly outfitted Core i7-6800K
  • Consistently topped pricier Core i7-7700K on tests that take advantage of all available cores
  • Cooler included in the box (unlike with the Ryzen 5 1600X)
  • Beats Intel 7500 and Intel 7600K in multi-threaded apps
  • Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack)
  • Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation
  • Heatsink included
  • Platform updated to incl
  • Comes With SMT Which Core i5 CPUs Lack
  • Outstanding Performance
  • Fully Unlocked
  • Can Easily Be OC'd to 4Ghz+
  • Perfect For Multi-Tasking
  • Future-Proof Platform
  • Great Price/Performance Value
  • Runs Very Cool

The editors didn't like

  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Gaming performance still lacks
  • Single-threaded performance is still behind Intel
  • Performance in lightly threaded applications
  • Memory overclocking
  • 1080p gaming and single-core performance still lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips
  • Higher power draw than Intel CPUs
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Boost frequency significantly lower than on R
  • Memory Compatibility Limited

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2020-02-18, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • We don't think this comparison calls for any further analysis. It's evidently clear that if you want to build a budget gaming PC, investing in a quad core to save even $50 is not worth it. You will have to deal with frame stuttering in a number of more de...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2020-01-27, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • That was our quick look at how the Ryzen 5 1600 AF performs and the results were as positive as we expected. It's a Ryzen 5 2600 with very minor reduction in clock speed. Speaking of which, you can of course overclock the 1600 AF as it's fully unlocked. O...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2019-06-10, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  This is a comparison we've been wanting to put together for some time. With Computex 2019 out of the way and the full confirmation of 3rd-gen Ryzen, before that hits us here's an updated comparison between the Ryzen 5 1600 and Core i5-7600K. It's time to...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-13, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  The leaks have been flying hard and fast for weeks, but this morning, AMD is officially taking the wraps off its second-generation Ryzen CPUs. Four new chips have been waiting in the wings, and they'll be available for pre-order around the world starting...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-09, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • We've have a pretty good look at application and game performance. As expected Intel's faster in games for the most part, while AMD's faster for most of the heavy workloads we tested, that being the situation this is how I look at it. Even with a GTX 1080...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-15, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • The R3 2200G offers highly competitive performance at its price and, ultimately, really has no immediate competition. At $100, the CPU offers 78-85% of the performance of the R5 2400G at 58% of the price. Not bad at all. We can strongly recommend the R3 2...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-31, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  Our most recent CPU roundup pitted Intel's 7th and 8th-gen Core i5 and Core i7s against AMD's Ryzen 5 and 7 by playing and benchmarking nine representative PC games at multiple resolutions. In total eight new CPUs were tested at their base clock speeds...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-23, Author: Bob , review by: thinkcomputers.org

  • Ryzen platform is very stable now, 6-cores, 12-threads, Fully unlocked, Comes with CPU cooler, Great performance compared to Intel's i5-8400
  • Gaming performance still lacks, Single-threaded performance is still behind Intel
  • If you have read our review of the Ryzen 7 1700 from earlier this year you know that we complained at how untested and unstable the Ryzen platform really was at launch. I think that most people who reviewed or purchased Ryzen parts right when the platform...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-09-11, Author: GaK_45 , review by: realhardwarereviews.com

  • Abstract:  AMD Ryzen 3 vs Ryzen 5 vs Ryzen 7So far we have taken a close look at most of AMD's Ryzen line-up and, while there have been variances from model to model, overall both the Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 7 series have indeed lived up to expectations. Their combination...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-16, Author: GaK_45 , review by: realhardwarereviews.com

  • Abstract:  With the release of the Ryzen 7 series of CPUs by AMD this year certainly has been exciting times for enthusiast. For the first time in a long-time enthusiast's actually had options in the high-end desktop arena. So much so that the idea of opting for Int...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 1 of 28 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×