us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 422 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(85%)
422 Reviews
Users
(90%)
12 Reviews
85 0 100 422

The editors liked

  • Great Multi Thread performance
  • Solid Gaming Performance
  • Nice Overclocking room on 1700
  • Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
  • Price
  • Power Efficiency
  • Experience
  • Eight cores and 16 threads at half the price of Intel
  • Excellent performance in workstation applications
  • AM4 is a modern
  • Full-featured platform
  • While only a small performance boost
  • XFR is zero-effort and works well
  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Strong Overall Performance
  • 8-Cores / 16-Threads
  • Power Friendly
  • Aggressive Pricing
  • Huge performance leap over previous-generation AMD FX processors
  • Trades blows with Intel's Core i7-6900K at half the price
  • Very price-aggressive motherboard options
  • AMD processors are competitive again
  • Outstanding performance in heavy multi-threaded apps
  • Cheaper than Intel HEDT processors
  • Single-threaded performance improved
  • Low power draw and excellent power efficiency
  • Platform updated to include latest feature
  • Performance
  • Power consumption
  • Value
  • Great value. Smooth gaming with strong minimum frame rates. Powerful productivity performance. Runs cool

The editors didn't like

  • Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
  • Gaming performance is weak compared to Intel
  • Particularly in modern titles
  • Specialised AVX applications will perform better under Intel
  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Issues In A Few Benchmarks
  • Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
  • Requires dedicated graphics card
  • Single-core performance lags behind competing Intel "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Chipsets don't have as many PCI Express/SATA ports as Intel's offerings
  • Gaming performance at 1080p lags behind Intel
  • At least for now
  • Horrible motherboards / BIOS
  • Feels not ready for market
  • Limited game performance
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Overclocking barely worth it
  • Requires optimized
  • Overclocking
  • Not really cons
  • But the few areas where Ryzen fell short of Intel were gaming performance and power consumption. Not great overclockers

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 35 of 43
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-06-12, Author: Daniel , review by: gamesite.sk

  • cena, výkon vo viac-jadrových procesoch,
  • zatiaľ nedokonalá optimalizácia, nižšia kompatibilita s RAM, malé možnosti pretaktovania
  • Zachránil príchod Ryzen 7 ľudstvo a počítačových nadšencov? Zďaleka nie. Zachránil reputáciu a možno aj samotnú spoločnosť AMD? Je to diskutabilné, no áno. Ryzen ukázal, že v AMD to stále vedia a 1800X je absolútne monštrum, čo sa týka produktivity a prof...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-06, Author: PCWorld , review by: pcworld.bg

  • Abstract:  Денислав Славчев Последните години не бяха никак леки за AMD. Компанията изпитваше сериозни затруднения на процесорния пазар поради липсата на достатъчно иновативни предложения.  Изоставането и спрямо основния  конкурент с всяка изминала години се увелича...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Димитър , review by: hardwarebg.com

  • И така успешен ли е Ryzen или не? В процесорните тестове усреднено предимството на Ryzen 7 1800x пред по-стария FX-8370 е впечатляващите 96%. Срещу предложенията на Intel разликата е съответно 21% по-бърз от i7-5930K и 19% предимство спрямо i7-7700К. Като...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Димитър , review by: hardwarebg.com

  • И така успешен ли е Ryzen или не? В процесорните тестове усреднено предимството на Ryzen 7 1800x пред по-стария FX-8370 е впечатляващите 96%. Срещу предложенията на Intel разликата е съответно 21% по-бърз от i7-5930K и 19% предимство спрямо i7-7700К. Като...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-22, review by: bozzabench.com

  • Kao što ste već primetili ovog puta nismo žurili sa objavom testa. Tradicionalno kašnjenje novih komponenti u naše krajeve je moglo samo da znači kompromis ubrzanih zaključaka i delimičnog vrednovanja realnih performansi. Obzirom da je izlazak AMD Zen arh...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-12-05, review by: pcpop.com

  • Abstract:  AMD的锐龙处理器发布已经有一段时间,我们也在第一时间进行了首发评测,相信各位也已经对AMD这次的翻身之作有了不少了解...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: 孙斌 , review by: pcpop.com

  • 总体来看,第二代AMD锐龙处理器相对于第一代产品的进步还是比较明显的,多线程拥有超过10%的性能提升,更高主频也带来了单线程性能的提高,给游戏性能带来了明显的改善。从性能上来讲,作为在第一代产品上的优化完善,12nm的“Zen+”架构足够令人满意。性价比方面,以Ryzen 7 2700X为例,2699元的上市价格相比前代顶级型号Ryzen 7 1800X 3999元的上市价格有了显著的降低,甚至和目前Ryzen 7 1800X的价格持平。如果考虑到随产品赠送的幽灵Prism散热器,Ryzen 7 2700...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-21, Author: 吴紫磨 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 纠错与问题建议标签:笔记本电脑1W元以上独显笔记本笔记本PK擂台 nb.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 2602 AMD的Ryzen系列处理器在今年掀起了PC市场的反击狂潮,时下R5、R3 系列已经全面铺货,对Intel构成了莫大的压力。全线对垒形式下,笔记本端的APU战线也已经补全, 锐龙7 2700U以极大的优势碾压了默认TDP下的英特尔8代酷睿低电压处理器,更强悍的R5 240...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-06, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 目前八代酷睿只有Z300系列的主板可选,而目前市面上可购买到的Z300系列主板价格均在1500元左右,单处理器与主板这两件产品就占到了4699元左右。本就仓促发布的产品加上高昂的平台成本更加限制了玩家们购买的热情,只能说英特尔走点心吧。而AMD不仅拥有高端系列的X300系列主板,更有性价比超高的B300系列中端主板,让整套成本瞬间降低700元,这多出的700元预算放在内存与固态硬盘上岂不美哉!可玩性上AMD这次真的是为玩家带来很多惊喜,全系列不锁频设计,加之B300系列的中端主板也可进行超频,进一步拉低了...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-06, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • 目前八代酷睿只有Z300系列的主板可选,而目前市面上可购买到的Z300系列主板价格均在1500元左右,单处理器与主板这两件产品就占到了4699元左右。本就仓促发布的产品加上高昂的平台成本更加限制了玩家们购买的热情,只能说英特尔走点心吧。而AMD不仅拥有高端系列的X300系列主板,更有性价比超高的B300系列中端主板,让整套成本瞬间降低700元,这多出的700元预算放在内存与固态硬盘上岂不美哉!可玩性上AMD这次真的是为玩家带来很多惊喜,全系列不锁频设计,加之B300系列的中端主板也可进行超频,进一步拉低了...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 35 of 43 « Previous   1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... 43   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×