us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 422 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(85%)
422 Reviews
Users
(90%)
12 Reviews
85 0 100 422

The editors liked

  • Great Multi Thread performance
  • Solid Gaming Performance
  • Nice Overclocking room on 1700
  • Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
  • Price
  • Power Efficiency
  • Experience
  • Eight cores and 16 threads at half the price of Intel
  • Excellent performance in workstation applications
  • AM4 is a modern
  • Full-featured platform
  • While only a small performance boost
  • XFR is zero-effort and works well
  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Strong Overall Performance
  • 8-Cores / 16-Threads
  • Power Friendly
  • Aggressive Pricing
  • Huge performance leap over previous-generation AMD FX processors
  • Trades blows with Intel's Core i7-6900K at half the price
  • Very price-aggressive motherboard options
  • AMD processors are competitive again
  • Outstanding performance in heavy multi-threaded apps
  • Cheaper than Intel HEDT processors
  • Single-threaded performance improved
  • Low power draw and excellent power efficiency
  • Platform updated to include latest feature
  • Performance
  • Power consumption
  • Value
  • Great value. Smooth gaming with strong minimum frame rates. Powerful productivity performance. Runs cool

The editors didn't like

  • Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
  • Gaming performance is weak compared to Intel
  • Particularly in modern titles
  • Specialised AVX applications will perform better under Intel
  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Issues In A Few Benchmarks
  • Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
  • Requires dedicated graphics card
  • Single-core performance lags behind competing Intel "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Chipsets don't have as many PCI Express/SATA ports as Intel's offerings
  • Gaming performance at 1080p lags behind Intel
  • At least for now
  • Horrible motherboards / BIOS
  • Feels not ready for market
  • Limited game performance
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Overclocking barely worth it
  • Requires optimized
  • Overclocking
  • Not really cons
  • But the few areas where Ryzen fell short of Intel were gaming performance and power consumption. Not great overclockers

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 43
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2021-10-12, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • All the data we've gathered provides real insight into how AMD and Intel CPU architectures compared over the past decade for gaming. We've seen AMD come from nowhere to often beating Intel, while the latter has made smaller steps in pure architecture term...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-06-21, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  With 3rd-gen Ryzen set to hit stores very soon, we're warming up to that launch by revisiting some heated CPU battles from the past couple of years that can bring further context to current owners of these processors.Today's shoot out is between the Ryz...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-03, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Abstract:  Its hard to believe considering we just finished up an Intel launch, but it is already time to check out Intel’s next launch. Kaby Lake was launched at the beginning of this year and the Mainstream lineup of CPUs is getting refreshed with Coffee Lake and Z370. This is the 8th generation of Intel’s Core processors going back to the original launch back in 2006...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-27, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  Finally. After an eventful week in the world of hardware benchmarking, I've wrapped up our gaming test results for AMD's second-generation Ryzen CPUs. We've taken some extra time to bench each Intel and AMD chip in our test suite with stock RAM as well as...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-13, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  The leaks have been flying hard and fast for weeks, but this morning, AMD is officially taking the wraps off its second-generation Ryzen CPUs. Four new chips have been waiting in the wings, and they'll be available for pre-order around the world starting...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-02, Author: Bình , review by: topnewreview.com

  • Stunning multi-core performance, solid single-core support, advanced feature set and good TDP, but at an insane price.9 Total ScoreAMD Ryzen 7 1800X ReviewStunning multi-core performance, solid single-core support, advanced feature set and good TDP, but a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2018-01-02, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Abstract:  Its hard to believe considering we just finished up an Intel launch, but it is already time to check out Intel’s next launch. Kaby Lake was launched at the beginning of this year and the Mainstream lineup of CPUs is getting refreshed with Coffee Lake and Z370. This is the 8th generation of Intel’s Core processors going back to the original launch back in 2006...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-18, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Wrapping up with the 720p data first, these low-res results are important for a few reasons, though for some they can be a bit misleading. They're important because they show us the true difference between CPUs in these games. With any speed limits remove...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-05, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • So I think most people will admit that AMD has had a lot of wins this year with all of the Ryzen launches. As I found out in our 1700v7700K coverage the 7700K was still a great performing CPU, especially when looking at gaming performance. But with ju...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-30, Author: Dr. , review by: techarp.com

  • The AMD Ryzen 7 1800X is definitely a far more powerful processor than the Intel Core i7-6700K. It has twice as many cores, and far more memory bandwidth. It was fantastic in 3D rendering and video transcoding, delivering 70-85% better performance. Sadly...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 1 of 43 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 43   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×