Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(67%)
224 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
670100224
The editors liked
Incredible Multi Threaded Performance
Excellent Price/Performance Ratio
Smooth Working Turbo Core For Speed Boost
Dual Turbo Modes For Increased Boost In Lightly Threaded Apps
Maintains Excellent Temps At Stock Speeds
Black Edition With Unlocked Multiplier
Eight Physical Cores
Easily Achieves High Overclocks
Excellent OC Performance Scaling
Easily Tweaked With AOD For Maximum Performan
Performance in highly threaded programs
Overclocking
Good MT Performance
8-Cores
32nm Process
Fairly Overclockable
Affordably Priced
Excellent multithreaded performance
Attractive price
Unlocked multiplier for simplified overclocking
First consumer eightcore processor
Officially supports 4GHzplus turbo speeds and DDR31866 memory
An FX system has 42 PCIE lanes as opposed to the 24 lanes of a Sandy Bridge system
990FX chipset supports NVIDIA SLI. Finally
AMD finally has a 32nm processor with good overclocking
Modular and versatile architecture
Great performance in multithreaded applications
Great overclocking potential
Eight-core processing for under $250
Speedy for the price with multi-threaded software
Unlocked for overclocking
The editors didn't like
Performance In Single Threaded Apps Not On Par With Multithreaded
Gold
Discuss this review in our forums
Single core performance
Consumed More Power Than 45nm Phenom II
Intel Still Offers Better Overall Performance and Power
Questionable Single Thread Performance
Not always faster than competing Intel or AMD CPUs
Sluggish with multi-threaded workloads
High power usage under load
No integrated graphics
May require new motherboard
Windows 8 required for some features
Requires a new Socket AM3 motherboard
Single core performance has remained static
Full performance requires Windows 8 system and applications that use its new instructions
Overall similar performance to Core i5 2500K
But at a higher price
General performance below expectations
And rival products
High power consumption under load
Compared to Intel's chips
Not the best choice for hardcore gamers
Slower than cheaper chips in tests with single-threaded apps
Abstract: We've already seen AMD's Bulldozer architecture come up short in the performance benchmarks. However, the company also claims it made important improvements to power consumption. Can FX-8150 at least score some points in the energy efficiency departmen...
Performance in applications makes effective use of multiple cores, Two Turbo modes
Power consumption, Performances should be higher compared with competitors' CPUs and AMD's older models
Ultimately, the AMD FX-8150 is a good CPU in every field apart from power consumption. AMD has finally climbed back up to the performance levels of Intel, but we were expecting more, as the next generation of Intel CPUs risks leaving AMD trailing behin...
Abstract: The dust has settled, AMD's 'Bulldozer' FX-8150 chip has been stripped bare, and we've passed judgement. Nonplussed by the apparent lethargy of the processor in our suite of benchmarks, AMD sent word that FX was particularly partial to being overclocke...
Abstract: Perhaps the most hotly-anticipated launch in 2011, AMD’s FX processor line-up is finally ready for prime time. Does the company’s new Bulldozer architecture have what it takes to face Intel’s Sandy Bridge and usher in a new era of competition? How much...
Abstract: I used to be quite a big fan of AMD, when the good old Athlon Mobile processors hit the market. They seemed to offer the best bang for buck in terms of performance and overclockability and they quickly became a hit.After this, AMD continued to offer typic...
