us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

The editors liked

  • Incredible Multi Threaded Performance
  • Excellent Price/Performance Ratio
  • Smooth Working Turbo Core For Speed Boost
  • Dual Turbo Modes For Increased Boost In Lightly Threaded Apps
  • Maintains Excellent Temps At Stock Speeds
  • Black Edition With Unlocked Multiplier
  • Eight Physical Cores
  • Easily Achieves High Overclocks
  • Excellent OC Performance Scaling
  • Easily Tweaked With AOD For Maximum Performan
  • Performance in highly threaded programs
  • Overclocking
  • Good MT Performance
  • 8-Cores
  • 32nm Process
  • Fairly Overclockable
  • Affordably Priced
  • Excellent multithreaded performance
  • Attractive price
  • Unlocked multiplier for simplified overclocking
  • First consumer eightcore processor
  • Officially supports 4GHzplus turbo speeds and DDR31866 memory
  • An FX system has 42 PCIE lanes as opposed to the 24 lanes of a Sandy Bridge system
  • 990FX chipset supports NVIDIA SLI. Finally
  • AMD finally has a 32nm processor with good overclocking
  • Modular and versatile architecture
  • Great performance in multithreaded applications
  • Great overclocking potential
  • Eight-core processing for under $250
  • Speedy for the price with multi-threaded software
  • Unlocked for overclocking

The editors didn't like

  • Performance In Single Threaded Apps Not On Par With Multithreaded
  • Gold
  • Discuss this review in our forums
  • Single core performance
  • Consumed More Power Than 45nm Phenom II
  • Intel Still Offers Better Overall Performance and Power
  • Questionable Single Thread Performance
  • Not always faster than competing Intel or AMD CPUs
  • Sluggish with multi-threaded workloads
  • High power usage under load
  • No integrated graphics
  • May require new motherboard
  • Windows 8 required for some features
  • Requires a new Socket AM3 motherboard
  • Single core performance has remained static
  • Full performance requires Windows 8 system and applications that use its new instructions
  • Overall similar performance to Core i5 2500K
  • But at a higher price
  • General performance below expectations
  • And rival products
  • High power consumption under load
  • Compared to Intel's chips
  • Not the best choice for hardcore gamers
  • Slower than cheaper chips in tests with single-threaded apps
  • New AM3+ socket demands new motherboard

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 11 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: madboxpc.com

  • He usado AMD desde que tuve que comprar el primer equipo con dinero de mi bolsillo y no tarjeta de crédito de algún familiar, por lo que me siento más que familiarizado con la excelente relación calidad/precio que han otorgado a los ñoños faltos de din...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: oZeros , review by: ozeros.com

  • Abstract:  Uno de los procesadores más esperados, y después de mucho tiempo haciendo la tentativa de aparecer, hace su estreno hoy 12 de octubre, y en oZeros tenemos el agrado de darlo a conocer con un extenso review para ustedes.PortadaAMD Bulldozer: Datos técnicos...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-01, review by: chw.net

  • Considerando que Bulldozer fue muy esperado y anunciado por parte de AMD, más de alguno se sentirá defraudado por el rendimiento expuesto, esperando que el FX aplastara a cualquier procesador cual mosca, pero no fue así. Los resultados son categóricos ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge-E (2011, 32nm) Carte mère Asus P9X79 (4 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 3.0, SATA 6 Gb/s) Core i7-3970X Core i7-3930K LGA 1366: Bloomfield/Gulftown (2008/2010, 45/32nm) Carte mère Intel DX58SO (3 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 2.0, SATA 3 Gb...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-05, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge-E (2011, 32nm) Carte mère Asus P9X79 (4 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 3.0, SATA 6 Gb/s) Core i7-3970X Core i7-3930K LGA 1366: Bloomfield/Gulftown (2008/2010, 45/32nm) Carte mère Intel DX58SO (3 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 2.0, SATA 3 Gb...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-02-24, Author: Eric , review by: comptoir-hardware.com

  • Abstract:  En juin 2006, Intel abandonnait sa tant décriée microarchitecture Netburst pour lancer Core, renonçant dès lors à la course à la fréquence au profit de l'efficacité pour un résultat que l'on connait : jamais le fondeur n'a depuis cédé le trône des perform...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-06-12, Author: Eric , review by: comptoir-hardware.com

  • Abstract:  En juin 2006, Intel abandonnait sa tant décriée microarchitecture Netburst pour lancer Core, renonçant dès lors à la course à la fréquence au profit de l'efficacité pour un résultat que l'on connait : jamais le fondeur n'a depuis cédé le trône des perform...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-11-07, review by: presence-pc.com

  • Abstract:  Véritable cerveau de l’ordinateur, le processeur se doit d’être choisi avec le plus grand soin. En effet, si le nombre de fabricants de processeurs x86 grand public s’est réduit comme une peau de chagrin au fil des ans, la quantité de modèles différent...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-07-25, Author: Jean-Luc , review by: erenumerique.fr

  • Abstract:  Le choix du processeur reste l'élément essentiel à prendre en compte lors de l'achat d'un PC. Il détermine en grande partie la puissance de l'ordinateur et aussi l'usage que l'on peut en faire suivant ses caractéristiques. Faisons un point sur l'offre exi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-19, review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Vous l'aurez compris, ce patch Windows ne transfigure pas les AMD FX. L'amélioration de performance reste toutefois appréciable dans certains cas et on peut espérer que la sortie finale des deux patchs prévue pour le premier trimestre 2012 permettra...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 11 of 23 « Previous   1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×