us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4

Testseek.com have collected 220 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice August 2017
August 2017
 
(88%)
220 Reviews
Users
(60%)
2 Reviews
88 0 100 220

The editors liked

  • The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance
  • Uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X
  • The 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
  • Better performance than the equivalent Intel chip for the price
  • Fully featured platform across all chips
  • While liquid cooling is a must
  • Theadripper is easier to tame than Skylake-X
  • Huge improvements in production tasks over mainstream CPUs
  • Competitiv
  • Workstation and productivity applications
  • Price per core
  • Solder
  • MultiThreaded performance
  • PCIe connectivity
  • Wildly extreme 32-thread performance
  • For the same price as Intel's new 20-thread Core X-Series CPU
  • Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes
  • Great Multi-Threaded Performance
  • Massive Amounts Of IO
  • High Memory Bandwidth
  • Modern Chipset Support
  • Unlocked And Tweakable
  • Disruptive Pricing

The editors didn't like

  • The $1
  • 000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming
  • Overclocking remains limited
  • Needs a suitably robust cooling setup and power supply
  • Lags behind Intel in overall IPC performance
  • Confusing settings
  • Low resolution gaming performance
  • CPU is large and will need a robust cooler
  • Particularly when overclocking
  • Byzantine installation process compared to mainstream CPUs
  • Competing Intel chips are better at lightly threaded tasks
  • Relatively High Power Consumption
  • Trails Intel In Lightly-Threaded Apps
  • Still Pricey
  • Though Better Than Intel

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 18 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-10-19, Author: 郎孟华 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 纠错与问题建议标签:CPU酷睿游戏Intel cpu.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 1363 Intel第九代酷睿系列处理器发布,相关参数也已经完全曝光,今天我们将会检测第九代酷睿处理器首发型号i9-9900K、i7-9700K以及i5-9600K的性能表现,通过首发评测的介绍,想必您可以非常清晰的知道i9-9900K、i7-9700K以及i5-9600K这三款处理器的性能水平,希望可以对您针对...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-08-14, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  前日晚间消息,AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX(简写RT-2990WX)正式解禁了,意味着这款处理器的性能会得到全面的揭晓。今天小编要为大家带来的是AMD 2950X对比AMD 1950X评测,想知道RT-2950X和1950X哪个好的朋友千万不要错过了。在正式对比之前,小编先来一个小插曲。对于AMD发布的第二代线程撕裂者的命名方式。我们知道第一代的命名方式1950X,那么第二代开头的数字“2”自然表示第二代,今年发布的二代线程撕裂者一共有四款产品(分别是RT-2990W...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-13, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • i9-7900X的价格和Ryzen 1950X持平,但通过以上几个方面的测试来说,Ryzen 1950X整体优势要高出i9-7900X 15%左右,如果是这样的话,很显然Ryzen 1950X性价比更高,更值得入手。以上就是脚本之家小编为大家带来的AMD 1950X与i9-7900X性能对比全面评测,希望可以帮助到大家,大家如果还有疑问的话,可以在下方的评论框内给我们留言哦。我们会尽自己所能的为大家解答。谢谢大家一如既往的支持,也请大家继续关注脚本之家的后续教程和软件。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-12, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • i9-7980XE的价格是Ryzen 1950X的两倍,但其性能只强了不到10%,并不是说Intel的定价有什么问题,其实在半导体领域,性能提高一点点,价格要贵一大截,这是合理的,不光是CPU,毕竟它们已经代表了这领域的最强性能了。以上就是脚本之家小编为大家带来的AMD 1950X与i9-7980XE性能对比评测,希望可以帮助到大家,大家如果还有疑问的话,可以在下方的评论框内给我们留言哦。我们会尽自己所能的为大家解答。谢谢大家一如既往的支持,也请大家继续关注脚本之家的后续教程和软件。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-08, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  AMD 今年发布 ZEN 架构 CPU 产品以来,整个产品线也是逐渐步入正轨,Intel 孤独领跑多年的 X 系列产品终于有了并肩前进的竞争对手。今天我们就来对比一下AMD和Intel目前最强的TR4 1950X和i9 7900X的区别,看看这两款双平台最强CPU究竟谁更强。1950X与7900X对比评测首先来看测试平台,AMD平台除了最强的TR4 1950X,还有1920X,而Intel平台除了最强的i9 7900X外,还加入了i7 6950X和八代最强i7 8700K进行对比,可以说涵盖了AM...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-11-30, Author: Axe斧娃 , review by: expreview.com

  • 通过我们的测试结果,其实可以发现原本规格已经非常强悍、本身并不是主要针对游戏市场的Ryzen Threadripper 1950X也可以通过简单的优化而得到非常明显的游戏性能提升,好几款游戏都有20%以上的提升。如果仔细看的话,就会发现尤其是超频内存频率得到的性能提升更加明显,其实这背后的根本原因就是内存的延迟时间。如果使用AIDA 64测试内存延迟时间的话,会发现在默认的创作者模式、普通频率状态下,内存延时非常高,可以达到110ns,而如果按照我们的测试模拟,使用游戏模式,并且将内存频率提上去,就可以将...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-27, Author: nApoleon , review by: chiphell.com

  • Abstract:  由于时间关系这里只对超频做了一点简单的试验. (AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 评测详见: ) 在Ryzen Threadripper正式解禁以后AMD也在官网上线了专用版本的Ryzen Master.不过似乎同样由于时间关系,首版并没有像此前AM4上主流级使用版本那样自带中文. 和之前一样,Ryzen Master (Threadripper版)支持温度和频率监控,各核心倍频调整,核心禁用,电压设置,内存设定显示.新增了针对Ryzen Threadripper的附件选项,如内...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-23, Author: 香香 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 2、游戏性能测试对比通过游戏测试对比,两者没有区别。对比总结:上图是Ryzen 1950X和1920X的区别,具体的选择,还要根据自己的实际情况,预算多的话,还是选择可玩性更高的Ryzen 1950X。其实Ryzen 1920X性能已经足够强大。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-18, Author: 上方文Q , review by: mydrivers.com

  • Abstract:  AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper提供了最多16个核心32个线程,Intel Core i9也即将带来最多18个核心36个线程,对于内容创作、对多任务并行来说简直是天大的福音。但也不是所有应用都需要那么多核心线程,尤其是玩游戏,四核心配合适当频率其实就完全足够,多则反而经常无益,甚至太多核心反而会导致游戏性能下降,乃至无法运行。Intel Core i9-7900X就是反面例子 ,10核心20线程还有新架构,结果玩游戏反而还不如以前,帧率波动特别大。为此, AMD Ryzen ThreadRip...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-14, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • AMD使用的三星14nm LPP工艺能效比在多核心上更有优势,TR 1950X以180瓦功耗达到了16核3.7G的效能,在目前CPU制造工艺中可圈可点。Ryzen ThreadRipper处理器在多核心应用上确实有和intelCore i9掰腕子的能力,尤其是渲染类应用性能非常出色,高度并行计算中多核心能发挥等比率提升的优势,收益大于堆主频。通过利用Boost频率和XFR技术,ThreadRipper能在合理温度和功耗范围内对处理器加速,应付线程数比较少的工作任务。TR 1950X的定价仅相当于Intel...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 18 of 22 « Previous   1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×