Testseek.com have collected 220 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4.
August 2017
(88%)
220 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(60%)
2 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
880100220
The editors liked
The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance
Uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X
The 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
Better performance than the equivalent Intel chip for the price
Fully featured platform across all chips
While liquid cooling is a must
Theadripper is easier to tame than Skylake-X
Huge improvements in production tasks over mainstream CPUs
Competitiv
Workstation and productivity applications
Price per core
Solder
MultiThreaded performance
PCIe connectivity
Wildly extreme 32-thread performance
For the same price as Intel's new 20-thread Core X-Series CPU
Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes
Great Multi-Threaded Performance
Massive Amounts Of IO
High Memory Bandwidth
Modern Chipset Support
Unlocked And Tweakable
Disruptive Pricing
The editors didn't like
The $1
000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming
Overclocking remains limited
Needs a suitably robust cooling setup and power supply
Lags behind Intel in overall IPC performance
Confusing settings
Low resolution gaming performance
CPU is large and will need a robust cooler
Particularly when overclocking
Byzantine installation process compared to mainstream CPUs
Competing Intel chips are better at lightly threaded tasks
