Testseek.com have collected 344 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
June 2015
(85%)
344 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
850100344
The editors liked
Vega 64 is slightly slower than the GTX 1080
While the liquid cooled version wins more than it loses against the GTX 1080
Efficient cooler
Back plate
Quiet fans
Excellent option for QHD gaming
Compact for a high-end card geared toward 4K gaming output
Runs quiet and cool
Thanks to bundled radiator and fan
Roughly matches Nvidia's GeForce GTX 980 Ti at 4K and high settings
Great Performance
Relatively Quiet
More Efficient Than Its Predecessors
Innovative Memory Technology
Competitive Pricing
Great performance
Competitive pricing
Bang-for-buck
Improved power efficiency over Radeon 300 series
Open-world
Gorgeous Visuals and impressive Graphics on PC
Polished PC Performance with Mod Support
Modern Combat is fun and engaging
All Current and Future DLC supported
Best performance
excellent power consumption
Overclocking
Dead silent
Great performance at 4K
Low gaming noise
Compact form factor
Low temperatures
Power efficient gaming
HBM memory
Tons of bandwidth
Multi-monitor power consumption greatly improved
Backplate included
ZeroCore power
Dual-BIOS
Support for AMD FreeS
Performance is competitive with the GTX 980 Ti and AMD's HBM allows for a compact design that runs exceptionally cool and quiet with the bundled liquid cooler.
Excellent for HD and 1440p PC gaming
Superb cooling system
Very efficient design for minimized noise and heat
New Fiji processor
Compact design
The editors didn't like
Poor availability and thus pricing. AMD's aircooled RX Vega 64 reference card is ~5% slower than the GTX 1080 FE despite being hotter
Louder and using more power (though we have high hopes for custom cards)
Power
Overclocking
Size
Overall performance slides in just behind Nvidia's competing card
Especially at lower resolutions
Radiator complicates installation
Takes up space gained by smaller card
Lack of HDMI 2.0 port makes card an iffy choice for gaming on a 4K HDTV
Not A Clear Victory Over GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Competitive Pricing
But Still Kind Of Pricey
Only 2 board partner releases
HBM Memory not overclockable yet
Repetitive Side quests may get tedious
Linear gameplay at the end of the game
Story issues with pacing and confusing
Slower than expected in sub-4K resolutions
Pump emits permanent high-pitched whine
Some coil noise
Could be much quieter in idle
4 GB of VRAM
Lack of HDMI 2.0
No memory overclocking
Radiator takes up extra space
No DVI / analog VGA outputs
Being out of stock online might be the Fury X's biggest obstacle
Though the GTX 980 Ti is a better value in raw price vs. performance
If retailers stick to the £509 price point, or even manage to hit £499 then the Fury X offers a competitive alternative to the GTX 980 Ti. The competition does offer some higher framerates but the Fury X is more than just raw numbers… its a really lovely...
Abstract: Last week AMD introduced the complete new line up of the Radeon R7/R9 300-series. However, all these new models are based on existing technology and GPUs. Today AMD is presenting their newest top end model based on a completely new chip. In our review w...
AMD's fans wanted to see an ultra-high-end powerhouse capable of creaming GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Its detractors assumed a series of delays meant it'd be too hot and slow. In reality, neither group can claim clairvoyance.Instead, the Radeon R9 Fury X delivers...
Liquid cooler's radiator is unwieldy, Doesn't beat the GTX 980 Ti
So, here's the moment of truth. Should you buy the Radeon R9 Fury X instead of the GTX 980 Ti? Probably not. The Fury X is an impressive card. Were it alone in its bracket, or priced slightly differently, it'd be easy to recommend. At $649, though, it...
The implementation of HBM appears to change the way a card scales upwards with resolution increases. Typically, if a card was similar to a GTX 980 at 1080p, it would also be very similar at 4K. What we see here, however, is the Fury X performing close to...
So there you have it: Between the new Fiji GPU and the inclusion of HBM, AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X enters the rarefied air of single-GPU cards capable enough to play games at 4K resolutions with high graphics detail settings enabled--an exclusive club contai...
Liquid cooling loop means card runs very cool, Quiet operation, Frontplate can be removed and customized, Slightly more affordable than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Performance still trails NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, Compact card, but installing the radiator needs some consideration
If not for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X would be far easier to recommend.AMD needs a win with the Radeon R9 Fury X. No company wants to always be seen as the budget and value-for-money option, and the Fury X is supposed to be AM...
Abstract: Los chicos de TechSpot han publicado un excelente análisis de rendimiento de Mass Effect Andromeda, uno de los juegos más esperados del año. En su artículo han utilizado un total de 24 tarjetas gráficas de diferentes generaciones.Es una lástima que no ha...
Abstract: Los chicos de TechSpot han publicado un excelente análisis de rendimiento de Mass Effect Andromeda, uno de los juegos más esperados del año. En su artículo han utilizado un total de 24 tarjetas gráficas de diferentes generaciones...
